B08_Solicitation_Attachment_13_Proposal_Submission_Package.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P3023R0029
About this file
This document contains templates and instructions for submitting proposals in response to solicitation number 140P3023R0029 from the National Park Service for crosswalk striping and roadway markings services. Key details include: the solicitation seeks proposals for roadway marking services on the National Mall and Memorial Parks; templates are provided for a project experience form and customer rating questionnaire to be included in the technical volume of proposals; proposals are due by email to the point of contact by the specified response date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NAMA CROSSWALK STRIPING AND ROADWAY MARKINGS ATTACHMENT 13
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PACKAGE
INSTRUCTIONS: The following forms may be used to prepare proposals for the subject solicitation as applicable.
CONTENTS:
For Technical Volume:
1. Project Experience Form
2. Customer Rating Questionnaire
Project Experience Form (Offerors must complete this form for evaluation purposes)
| NAME OF FIRM |
| POINT OF CONTACT |
TELEPHONE NO.
FAX NO.
PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR - LIST UP TO FIVE (5) INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
| CONTRACT/PROJECT NO. |
| LOCATION |
| CONTRACT AMOUNT (ROUND TO NEAREST DOLLAR) |
| ORIGINAL |
| FINAL |
1.
| $ |
| $ |
2.
| $ |
| $ |
3.
| $ |
| $ |
| NAME OF CLIENT/AGENCY |
| POINT OF CONTACT |
| TELEPHONE NO. |
| FACSIMILE NO. |
| ORIGINAL PROJECT DATES |
| WERE YOU A PRIME CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR? |
| WERE THERE CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS? (YES/NO) |
| HOW MANY? |
| WHO INITIATED THEM? CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR BOTH? |
| START |
| COMPLETION |
| WERE THERE ANY TIME EXTENSIONS? (YES/NO) |
| IF SO, INDICATE NEW COMPLETION DATE? |
| WAS THE SCHEDULE MET? |
(YES/NO)
IF NOT, WHAT WAS THE REASON?
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
| HAVE YOU EVER ENTERED INTO A DISPUTE? (YES/NO) |
| IF SO, WHAT WAS THE REASON? |
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
HAVE YOU EVER
BEEN DEFAULTED?
(YES/NO)
IF SO, WHAT WAS THE REASON?
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
CUSTOMER RATING QUESTIONNAIRE – CHOH Reactivate Monocacy Maintenance Building
Reference is provided for: _____________________
Please provide information for the primary individuals completing this survey.
Name: ____________________________________________________________________
Office Identifier: _____________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: __________________________________________________________
Mailing Address: _____________________________________________________________
E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________________
Contract # and Title, and Relation to Contract: ______________________________________
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Return via e-mail to bophany_drakeford@nps.gov RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional (1) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract. |
| Good (2) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements. |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (4) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (5) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (6) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
| (1) How responsive was the contractor’s quality program in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (2) How complete were the contractor’s quality procedures and how well do employees follow them? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (3) Rate timeliness in meeting requirements and adhering to contract schedules (delivery/performance). |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (4) Did the contractor provide adequate, competent and qualified, management, key personnel and technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
(5) How flexible, cooperative, and reasonable was the contractor in meeting mission Requirements, particularly when faced with short-notice mission changes?
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (6) How effective was the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations? Did the contractor implement and follow their safety plan? Did they run a “safe” jobsite? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (7) Applicable to Federal Contracts – How well did the contractor comply with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Service Contract Act – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Executive Order 13101? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (8) How innovative was the contractor in performing the technical aspects of this contract and resolving problems? How well did the contractor respond to and act on customer feedback? (Customer Satisfaction) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (9) How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
(10) Please Provide Any Additional Information You Feel Is Important Not Covered Elsewhere:
Thank you for your remarks. Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor referenced with the Reference ID Form you were provided.
Signature: ____________________________________ Date Completed:___________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .