B08_SOL_-_Attachment_4_-_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Roofing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity co Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140D0424R0053
Issued by
Department of the Interior Departmental Offices Interior Business Center

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to Solicitation 140D0424R0053 for a Roofing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the Stewart Lee Udall Main Interior Building. The PPQ requests information about the offeror's past performance, including the agency/customer, contract title, type, value, period of performance, and the offeror's role as prime or subcontractor. It also evaluates the offeror's performance across several criteria such as quality of product/service, program management, timeliness, and business relations. The PPQ is to be returned to the offeror for inclusion in their quote submission. The Roofing IDIQ contract is being solicited by the Department of the Interior Departmental Offices Interior Business Center.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Roofing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity co, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140D0424R0053_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_SOL_-_Attachment_1_SOW_2024_06_06_0001.doc DOC document
Questions_and_Answers_0001.docx DOCX document
Sol_140D0424R0053.pdf PDF
B08_SOL_-_Attachment_1_SOW.doc DOC document
B08_SOL_-_Attachment_3_Price_and_Bid_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_SOL_-_Attachment_2_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation 140D0424R0053

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Offeror:___________________________________________________________________

B. Agency/Customer:___________________________________________________________

C. Contract Title:______________________________________________________________

D. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________

E. Contract type: _______________________________________________________________

F. Award Date: ________________________________________________________________

G. Completion Date: ____________________________________________________________

H. Contract Value:

Initial: _____________________________________________
Final: ______________________________________________

I. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________

J. Offeror Role (Prime or Sub): __________________________________________________

K. Government Point of Contact:

Name:________________________________________________________
Email Address:_________________________________________________
Telephone Number:_____________________________________________

L. Project Description

Please return this form to the contractor that has submitted for evaluation, they will provide with their quote submission.

If uncomfortable with providing directly to the contractor, please submit a copy to:

Joe Honeywell, joseph_honeywell@ibc.doi.gov

And Matthew Wilson, Matthew_Wilson@ibc.doi.gov

SECTION 2: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
O
OUTSTANDING - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example to others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”.
E
EXCELLENT – The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements.
G
GOOD – There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements.
F
FAIR – Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
P
POOR – Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
U
UNSATISFACTORY – Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements.
N
NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score
Quality of Product or Service
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program

Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___Default___Convenience___Pending Terminations___
No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 3: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .