B08__Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(ATTACHMENT_1).pdf

United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, INTERIOR REGION 1

NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA CONTRACTING OFFICE

1100 Ohio Drive, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20242

Sol. No.

Attachment XX

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION

(Offerors must complete section “A” of the form and provide to the referencing client for submission on their behalf and for evaluation purposes for this RFP)

Offeror’s Name:

Contract Number: Total Contract Value: $ Contract Type:

(Including Modifications)

Period of Performance: to Place of Performance:

Contract Description (briefly describe all services provided under this contract):

with the subject line as follows:

EST on behalf of the offeror in efforts to evaluate how

SECTION B: REFERENCING CLIENT IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION

(Referencing Client must complete section “B” of this form and submit to the email Sol - by the RFP closing date/time:

well the offeror performed the contracting activities as related to the aforementioned contract).

Referencing Client Name (Agency/Business):

Address: City State

Contract Point of Contact: Phone Number: Email:

Date & Signature of Referencing Point of Contact

RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings in the following table for each rating criteria.

RATING DEFINITION

(1) Exceptional Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract.

(2) Very Good Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements.

(3) Satisfactory Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements.

(4) Marginal Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.

(5) Unsatisfactory Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements.

(6) Unknown or Not Applicable The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation.

EVALUATION CRITERIA EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL UN-SATISFACTORY NOT APPLICABLE

Adequacy & Competence of Management, Key, & Technical Personnel

Quality & Effectiveness of Communication with Agency/Company

Quality & Timeliness of Submittals

Overall Project Management Quality

Supervision of Contractor Employees/Subcontractors

Timeliness of Services Performed

Quality of Services Performed

Quality/Effectiveness of Discrepancy Identifications/Resolutions

Quality of Problem Solving

Cost/Price Control& Management (changes, modifications, etc.)

Quality of Deliverables

Timeliness of Deliverables

Technical Compliance

Compliance to Contractual Terms & Conditions

Schedule Adherence

Safety Quality, Control, & Management

Standards of Conduct

Cleanliness of Work Site

Adherence to Governing Laws, Policies, & Procedures

Adherence to Davis Bacon Wage Act

Timeliness & Processing of Invoicing (to include proper documentation & approvals)

Overall Customer Service Satisfaction

Overall Contractor Performance Satisfaction

Any rating of Marginal or Below, please provide further details here:

Provide any additional information that may not have been covered elsewhere but you may feel should be important to cover/identify in this area: