B08_Attachment_9_Proposal_Submission_Package.docx
DOCX document 57 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P2024R0181
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the demolition of a non-historic structure and miscellaneous debris at Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks in California. The project, identified as SEKI 342662, requires the removal of a government-owned structure that is no longer usable, as well as the restoration of the site to a buildable condition.
The RFP includes a Contract Price Schedule with two base proposal items - hazmat and demolition of the ranger station. It also includes a proposal option for hazmat remediation. Offerors are required to provide information on their relevant project experience, including a description of the work performed, any changes to the original price or schedule, and the means and methods used. The RFP is set aside for small businesses, with specific limitations on subcontracting. The solicitation number is 140P2024R0181, and the National Park Service is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks, California Demolition of Non-Historic Structure and Miscellaneous Debris
SEKI 342662
140P2024R0181
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
DENVER SERVICE CENTER
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2024R0181
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P2024R0181
PARK - PMIS: SEKI 342662
PROJECT TITLE: DEMOLISH NON-HISTORIC STRUCTURE AND MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS
| CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) |
| CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLI) TITLE |
| QUANTITY |
| UNIT OF MEASURE |
TOTAL PRICE
PMIS 342662 BASE PROPOSAL
| 1 |
| Hazmat |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 2 |
| Demo Ranger Statiion |
| 1 |
| LS |
TOTAL BASE PRICE PMIS 342662 (CLINs 1 through 2) ---------------------------------------------------
PMIS 342662 PROPOSAL OPTION
| 3 |
| Bid option 1: Hazmat Remediation |
| 1 |
| LS |
TOTAL BID OPTIONS PRICE PMIS 318259 (CLIN 9) ---------------------------------------
TOTAL BASE AND PROPOSAL OPTIONS PRICE FOR ALL CLINs (CLINs 1 through 3) -------------------------
All measurement and payment information is included in the project specifications and/or SOW.
Report on Limitations on Subcontracting [Template Version 7/25/19]
This report is required for small business, 8(a) or other socio-economic set-aside service contracts (including construction) priced at or above $150,000.
| Contract Number: |
| [Insert contract #] |
| Prime Contractor: |
| [Insert prime contractor's company name] |
| Current Total Contract Price: |
| [Insert the amount of the original contract + all excuted contract modifications] |
| Type of Set Aside: |
| [Insert type of set-aside: Small Business, HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB, 8(a), etc.] |
| Period of Performance |
| MM/DD/YYYY - MM/DD/YY |
| Type of Service (Required Participation): |
| [Put an X in the applicable box below per clause 52.219-3, 14, 27,29,30] |
1) Services (except construction). 50% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
2) General construction. 85% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
| X |
| 3) Construction by special trade contractors. 75% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors |
Participartion Calculation as of the Current Invoice
Amounts shown below shall include amounts from all previous invoices and the current invoice. Exclude the cost of materials.
| 1) Amount Invoiced by the Prime Contractor: |
| $0 |
| 2) Portion of Amount Invoiced for All Similarly Situated Subcontractors (SSS)* |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 3) Portion of Amount Invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS) |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 4) Prime & SSS Participation % |
| #DIV/0! |
| 5) % subcontracted to NSS |
| #DIV/0! |
* Similarly Situated Subcontractor (SSS): is a small business subcontractor that is a participant of the same Small Business Administration (SBA) program that qualified the prime contractor as an eligible offeror and awardee of the contract as defined in 13 CFR 125.6 (i.e. Small Business, HUBZone Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDOVB), etc.)
** Limitation on Subcontracting Percentage = (Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor - Portion of total amount invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS)/ Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor)
Corrective Action Plan
If the NSS % noted in line 5 above is not in compliance with the % required by contract clause 52.219-3, 14, 27,29,30 then the prime contractor shall provide a written corrective action plan below:
General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.
Name of Contractor/Offeror:
Surety
Name of Surety:
Address of Surety:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Corporate Bank
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
Corporate Bank
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
Insurance Company
Name:
Address:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types of Policies:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Material Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
Material Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .