B08-Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 149 KB Posted
- Attached to
- A250 Emergency Repairs to Pier 1
- Solicitation number
- 140P4326R0001
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template used by the Department of the Interior to evaluate contractor past performance during source selection for federal contract awards.
The PPQ is completed by evaluators who have direct experience with a contractor's performance on previous projects. The form collects firm information including project title, location, contract number, contract dates, and initial and final contract amounts. Evaluators provide their name, organization, address, email, and role in relation to the project. The questionnaire employs a five-point rating scale: "O" (Outstanding—performance greatly exceeded contract requirements), "A" (Above Average—performance exceeded requirements), "S" (Satisfactory—performance met requirements), "M" (Marginal—performance met minimum requirements with some material aspects less than satisfactory), and "U" (Unacceptable—performance was poor or did not satisfy requirements). Evaluators rate four specific performance areas: relationship with the client/customer contract team, overall corporate management and integrity, quality control, and ability to meet performance schedules. Additional yes-no questions address whether disciplinary actions (cure notices, show cause letters, reprimands, payment suspension, or termination) were issued; whether the evaluator would award another contract to the company; whether the customer was satisfied with final products and services; and whether the firm was given opportunity to respond to negative ratings. The form concludes with an overall rating selection and comments section, followed by signature and date lines. The form includes a notice to contractors restricting use of PPQ information for promotional or endorsement purposes, citing DIAR 1452.203-70.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P4326R0001_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| B09-Amed1_2_3-RFIs_0003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140P4326R0001_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| B09-Amed1_2-RFIs_0002.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140P4326R0001_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| B09-Amed1-RFIs_0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08-Attachment_3_-_Construction_WageDetermination-MA20260008-1_2_26.pdf | ||
| B08-Attachment_2_-PMIS_350460_-_Pier_1_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P4326R0001.pdf | ||
| B08-Attachment_5_-_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08-Attachment_4_-Construction_Contract_Administration_Provision.pdf | ||
| B08-Attachment_1-PMIS_350460_-_Pier_1_SOW.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Interior Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
Notice to Contractor
Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
DIAR 1452.203-70
Restriction on Endorsements - Department of the interior (JUL 1996)
The Contractor shall not refer to contracts awarded by the Department of the Interior in commercial advertising, as defined in FAR 31.205-1, in a manner which states or implies that the product or service provided is approved or endorsed by the Government or is considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services. This restriction is intended to avoid the appearance of preference by the Government toward any product or service. The Contractor may request the Contracting Officer to make a determination as to the propriety of promotional material.
(End of clause)
U.S. Department of the Interior, [Insert Bureau] is considering [Insert Company].
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance.
Firm Information
Project Title:
Location:
Description:
Company Name: Contract Number:
Start Date: Completion Date:
Initial Amount: Final Amount:
Evaluator
Evaluator Name: Company/Agency Name:
Address: POC Email:
Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:
Ratings Overview
Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.
“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.
“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.
“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.
Questionnaire
Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.
1. The relationship between the company and client’s/customer’s contract team:
O
A
S
M
U
2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:
3. Quality control:
4. Ability to meet the performance schedule:
5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:
Yes
No
6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain:
7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain:
8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
9. Overall Rating
10. Comments
Signatures
Name Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .