B08_Attachment_6_FACTS_Sheet.pdf

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

Complete FACTS Sheet for only three (3) relevant contracts that reflect performance of construction services that are similar in scope and size to the current effort. Offerer shall provide frank, concise comments regarding technical capability of performance. One of the three projects must be on a structure listed on the National Historic Register of Historic Places.

OFFEROR:

Name (Company):

Contact eMail Address:

UEI Number:

1. PROJECT ONE:

Project Title & Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Number of Modifications:

Name of Customer or Organization:

Contracting Officer’s eMail and phone number:

Contracting Officer’s Representative eMail and phone number:

Point of Contact’s eMail and phone number:

Type of Contract:

National Register of Historic Places Reference Number:

Role of the Offeror: [ ]Prime Contractor [ ] Subcontractor Original Contract Dollar Value:

Final Contract Dollar Value:

If there were changes in value from the original dollar value to the final dollar value, explain in no more than three sentences why?

Brief Description or Synopsis of Effort:

*Prompt: In a paragraph, not more than five sentences, summarize the work highlighting portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition.

to

In a paragraph not more than five sentences, speak to the details that support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery. Was the project delivered with regard to the original delivery date on time why or why not?

2. PROJECT TWO:

Project Title & Contract Number:

Period of Performance: to Number of Modifications:

Name of Customer or Organization:

Contracting Officer’s eMail and phone number:

Contracting Officer’s Representative eMail and phone number:

Point of Contact’s eMail and phone number:

Type of Contract:

National Register of Historic Places Reference Number:

Role of the Offeror: [ ]Prime Contractor [ ] Subcontractor Original Contract Dollar Value:

Final Contract Dollar Value:

If there were changes in value from the original dollar value to the final dollar value, explain in no more than three sentences why?

Brief Description or Synopsis of Effort:

Prompt: In a paragraph not more than five sentences, summarize the work highlighting portions

In a paragraph not more than five sentences, speak to the details that support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery. Was the project delivered with regard to the original delivery date on time why or why not?

3. PROJECT THREE:

Project Title & Contract Number:

Period of Performance: to Number of Modifications:

Name of Customer or Organization:

Contracting Officer’s eMail and phone number:

Contracting Officer’s Representative eMail and phone number:

Point of Contact’s eMail and phone number:

Type of Contract:

National Register of Historic Places Reference Number:

Role of the Offeror: [ ]Prime Contractor [ ] Subcontractor Original Contract Dollar Value:

Final Contract Dollar Value:

If there were changes in value from the original dollar value to the final dollar value, explain in no more than three sentences why?

Brief Description or Synopsis of Effort:

Prompt: In a paragraph not more than five sentences, summarize the work highlighting portions

In a paragraph not more than five sentences, speak to the details that support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery. Was the project delivered with regard to the original delivery date on time, why or why not?

If the offeror, joint venture member or critical subcontractor (if applicable) is a newly formed (in existence less than (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation) entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this and indicate their contract role. In not more than five sentences, describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY