B08_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL, PLANNING, DES. IDIQ1 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2121R0024
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL, PLANNING, DES. IDIQ1, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P2121R0024_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2121R0024_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Solicitation_140P2121R0024-003_0003.doc DOC document
Sol_140P2121R0024_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B08_Solicitation_140P2121R0024_0002.doc DOC document
Questions_and_Answers_0001.docx DOCX document
B08_Solicitation_140P2121R0024_0001.doc DOC document
Sol_140P2121R0024_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_1_Mock_Task_Order_PWS_2021.docx DOCX document
Sol_140P2121R0024.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3_IDIQ_Pricing_Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
B08_Attachment_2_MOCK_Pricing_Schedule_2021.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

When completed, this document is source selection sensitive and the Service will use it only for evaluation of this proposal and not share it outside of the evaluation team.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION

Consultant Name (Enter the name of the company being evaluated in this questionnaire)

Project Type (Define if the project was standalone or part of an overall contract.)

Period of Project Performance

Initial Project Cost

Final Project Cost

Reason(s) for Differences Between Initial Project Cost and Final Project Cost Shown Above:

Scope of Work Performed or Description of Services Provided

Evaluator Information (Information pertaining to individual completing this questionnaire.)

Name

Title

Phone

E-mail

Fax

Number of Months Worked on Contract

SECTION 2: QUALITY OF CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE

Use the following rating scale to indicate your satisfaction with the consultant’s performance in the specified areas by placing an “X” in the appropriate block.

RATING CODE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

5
OUTSTANDING,
Performance meets project objectives and exceeds many objectives. The consultant completed the project with a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant were highly effective.
4
Good
Performance meets project objectives and exceeds some objectives. The consultant completed the project with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant were effective.
3
Acceptable
Performance meets project objectives. The consultant’s completion of the project contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant appear, or were satisfactory.
2
Marginal
Some system performance requirements are met; some system operational requirements are met; substantial customer intervention required
1
Unacceptable
Performance fails to meet one or more project objectives and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The performance of the consultant on the project contained serious problems for which the consultant’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective.
N
Neutral
Not Observed Under This Project / Unable to Provide a Rating

Technical Performance

O
G
A
M
U
N

Ability to accomplish project technical requirements and implement high quality standards

Ability to meet project schedule

Quality/Integrity of technical data, reports and analyses provided for project

Management Approach

O
S
M
P
U
N

Effectiveness of overall project/program management (including ability to lead/manage/control the project effort)

Reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your personnel

Timeliness/effectiveness of project problem resolution

Understood/complied with your objectives and technical requirements

Ability to hire and provide a highly qualified workforce

Ability to retain quality personnel

Managed subcontractors effectively

Effectively performed quality control/quality check on subcontractor deliverables

You may provide more information on additional pages, not to exceed 2 pages.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .