B08_Attachment_4_Historic_Grange_at_Cumberland_Island_Hazmat_Survey.pdf

Pre-alteration Hazardous Material Survey

Historic Grange at Cumberland Island National Seashore

Cumberland Island, Georgia

Ms. Isabelle Gizinski GWWO Architects, Inc.

800 Wyman Park Drive, Suite 300 Baltimore, Maryland 21211

March 17, 2023

Pre-alteration Hazardous Materials Survey Historic Grange at Cumberland Island National Seashore Preservation & Rehabilitation Project i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Arc Environmental, LLC performed a pre-alteration hazardous material survey of the Historic Grange at Cumberland Island National Seashore (Site) to evaluate building materials which may be impacted by planned construction activities associated with the preservation and rehabilitation project. The survey included the assessment of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), and the inventorying universal or other potentially regulated wastes. The survey was non-destructive and was not performed in a manner which provided full access to interstitial cavities. The Site is located in Cumberland Island, Georgia. The pre-alteration survey was conducted on February 22, 2023.

During the survey, a total of 61 bulk samples were collected from 33 suspect homogenous areas identified throughout the Site; the 61 collected samples were split into 74 discrete layers for analysis. Based on the findings of the asbestos survey, 10 of the sampled homogeneous materials was confirmed by laboratory analysis to be asbestos-containing materials. The confirmed asbestos-containing materials include: joint compound, textured ceiling finish, resilient sheet goods, 12” x 12” grey floor tile, 12” x 12” faux slate floor tile, duct wrap, exterior window glazing, roof penetration caulk, built-up roof matrix, and chimney flashing. Additionally, historic sampling data provided to Arc Environmental identified ceiling and wall materials within the basement as ACM; the duct wrap and faux slate tiles were also verified to be ACM in prior testing. Section 2.0 provides additional details regarding the findings of the asbestos survey.

The lead-based paint screening was conducted at the Site using a portable X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) device. On-site testing revealed the presence of lead-based paint or coatings on surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the Site. Components which tested positive for lead-based paint include wood windows, casings, sills, lintels, sashes, and aprons; wood doors, trim, and transoms; hand-painted walls within the sunroom; fireplace mantels, surrounds, and decorative trim around hearths; plaster walls and ceilings; wood wainscotting, chair rail, crown molding, columns/posts, and baseboards; wood casework, shelves, and shelf supports; stair treads, risers, stringers, ballusters, and newell posts; exterior balcony floor and stucco. Section 3.0 provides detail regarding the LBP survey.

Visual inspections were performed to identify additional, potential environmental concerns associated with the Site. Observed, potentially regulated and/or Universal wastes inventoried include assumed mercury-containing light bulbs. In addition, visible suspect microbial growth was found to be present in portions of the Site including the First Floor, Second Floor, Attic, and Basement. Section 4.0 details the locations of the identified Universal and potentially regulated wastes.

Reviewed by:

Stacy Kahatapitiya Director of Industrial Hygiene Services

Historic Grange at Cumberland Island National Seashore

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Asbestos-containing Materials Survey

2.1 Methodology

2.2 Findings and Recommendations

3.0 Lead-based Paint Survey

3.1 Methodology

3.2 Findings and Recommendations

4.0 Additional Environmental Considerations

4.1 Mercury

4.2 Mold

Appendix A Asbestos Bulk Sampling Results Appendix B Summary of Materials Tested for Asbestos Appendix C Lead-based Paint Data Sheets Appendix D Photographic Log

1.0 Introduction

Arc Environmental, LLC performed a pre-alteration hazardous material survey of the Historic Grange at Cumberland Island National Seashore (Site) to evaluate building materials which may be impacted by planned construction activities associated with the preservation and rehabilitation project. The Site is located in Cumberland Island, Georgia.

The survey included the assessment and sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), and inventorying other potential environmental conditions of concern. The survey did not include destructive survey methods; the findings of the survey are presented in this report. The pre-alteration survey was conducted on February 22, 2023.

2.0 Asbestos-containing Materials Survey

2.1 Methodology

The asbestos survey included the identification, assessment, and sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials and was performed by Mr. Scott Rohlf, an asbestos inspector trained in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Accreditation Program (MAP). The survey was conducted under protocols established by the 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763 Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and 40 CFR 61 Subpart M, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), as feasible.

Every reasonable attempt was made to locate suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) present as thermal system insulation (TSI), surfacing material, or other miscellaneous materials. Specifically, Arc Environmental employed the following protocols while performing the survey: flooring materials were penetrated to the subfloor to determine how many layers of flooring were present; wall systems and ceiling systems were evaluated to identify suspect building materials associated with the systems themselves, as well as any accessible cavities; and mechanical insulation systems were evaluated to identify potential suspect insulation beneath jackets and wraps.

During the survey, a total of 61 bulk samples were collected from 33 suspect homogenous areas identified throughout the accessible portions of the Site. The bulk samples of suspect ACMs were submitted, along with the corresponding chain-of-custody forms, to EMSL Analytical for analysis. EMSL is accredited for asbestos analysis in bulk materials through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP).

The bulk samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining following the EPA method 600/R-93/116, Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials).

Based on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA’s) definition, a material which contains greater than one percent (1%) asbestos, as determined using the methods specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), is considered an ACM and must be handled according to OSHA, EPA, and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division regulations.

The findings and quantities of verified ACM are summarized in Table 1, Identified Asbestos-containing Materials. A copy of the chain of custody forms and Laboratory Analytical Results are included in Appendix A.

2.2 Findings and Recommendations

Table 1 below lists the confirmed ACMs identified at the Site. A complete list of the building materials sampled during this survey is presented in Appendix B. It is recommended that if additional suspect materials not identified in this report are uncovered/exposed during demolition or construction activities, the materials should be assumed to contain asbestos or sampled and analyzed for asbestos content to determine if they are ACMs.

Table 1: Identified Asbestos-containing Materials

HA Description Location Total Quantity

JC1 Joint Compound Attic ceiling 220 SF

TX1 Ceiling Finish with Fan Texture

First Floor Main Hall, Living Room, Dining Room, and Sunroom; Second Floor Guest Room

E206, Master Bedroom, Hallway, and Guest Room E207; and Attic Bedroom

4,000 SF

RS1 Resilient Sheet Goods Laundry Room 60 SF

FT2 12” x 12” Gray Floor Tile Second Layer of Flooring in Kitchen 110 SF

FT5 12” x 12” Faux Slate Pattern Floor Tile

First Floor Living Room, Family Room, and Main Hall 1,100 SF

DI1 Duct wrap On abandoned ductwork in Basement, with debris on floor

80 LF

50 SF

WG1 Exterior Window Glazing Exterior windows 46 EA

CK1 Penetration Caulk Roof 5 LF

RM1 Built-up Roof Matrix Main Roof 1,500 SF

FL1 Black Chimney Flashing Tar Chimney stack 8 LF

FB1 Fibrous Wall & Ceiling Boards Basement, with debris fields 1,032 SF

Regulated asbestos-containing materials (RACMs) identified at the Site include the previously identified wall and ceiling boards in the Basement, duct wrap, and the ceiling texture. A significant portion of the wall and ceiling boards have been removed, however, residue around nail heads and trimwork remain, in addition to debris fields throughout the basement. Debris associated with the duct wrap is also present within the basement; the abandoned, wrapped ducts are assumed to extend into existing chases. Debris fields associated with the ceiling texture are present within the attic bedroom where water damage to the ceilings is prevalent. The EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) regulate friable asbestos-containing materials. All friable asbestos-containing materials and debris fields must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and disposed of as a regulated waste prior to demolition activities that will result in the disturbance of these materials. Debris fields should be removed prior to other untrained trades entering the impacted spaces.

The EPA regulates Category I non-friable materials (resilient floor coverings, asphalt roof products, gaskets, and packings) when these materials have been rendered friable. Category I non-friable materials may become friable if subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading. The Category I Non-friable ACMs should be removed prior to disturbance if the materials may be rendered friable by construction activities. All abatement actions should be performed by personnel trained in accordance with EPA, OSHA, and Georgia EPD requirements for asbestos-related activities.

The window glazing is considered a Category II non-friable material. Category II non-friable materials are regulated if they have a high probability of becoming or have become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to impact the materials during the course of demolition activities. These materials must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to disturbance.

Joint compound is not regulated as a discrete material by NESHAP; however, OSHA regulates any homogeneous material that contains greater than 1% asbestos to ensure worker protection and safety.

Removal or disturbance of the identified joint compound must be performed in accordance with OSHA Class II abatement requirements.

In addition, if other suspect materials are encountered during demolition that may be impacted, these materials should be sampled and analyzed by PLM to verify asbestos content, or be assumed as ACM, prior to disturbance. A complete list of the suspect materials sampled during this survey is presented in Appendix A.

3.0 Lead-based Paint Survey

3.1 Methodology

Painted surfaces within the project area were visually inspected to determine their condition. A lead screening survey was conducted using an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer on painted building surfaces and/or components. Surfaces that are intact or deteriorated condition (as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Guidelines) do not pose an immediate health risk, regardless of the lead content. Leaded paint in poor condition is a priority lead-hazard and should be promptly addressed using approved Lead Safe Work Practices.

The screening included field readings in addition to periodic calibration checks to ensure that the instrument is within acceptable calibration parameters. Lead-based paint, when tested via XRF, is defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Georgia EPD as paint having lead concentrations equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm²).

The results of the lead-based paint survey are summarized in the XRF Lead-based Paint Inspection Data Sheets included in Appendix C.

3.2 Findings and Recommendations

233 of the field screening shots yielded lead concentration above the Georgia EPD threshold of (>1.0 mg/cm2) for lead-based paint. The lead-based coating was detected on the numerous interior and exterior components including wood windows, casings, sills, lintels, sashes, and aprons; wood doors, trim, and transoms; hand-painted walls within the sunroom; fireplace mantels, surrounds, and decorative trim around hearths; plaster walls and ceilings; wood wainscotting, chair rail, crown molding, columns/posts, and baseboards; wood casework, shelves, and shelf supports; stair treads, risers, stringers, ballusters, and newell posts; exterior balcony floor and stucco.

The lead screening does not include testing of every painted surface within the project area; rather its intention is to characterize groups of similar components and coatings. If similar components with the same substrate and paint to those identified below are encountered during renovation activities, they are to be treated as lead-based paint affected. The intended use of the structure has not been determined as of the drafting of this report; lead abatement and/or lead safe work practices may be required as part of the construction project.

A lead Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test should be conducted for the demolition debris generated on Site. A representative waste stream sample should be collected to characterize the demolition debris, in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), to determine disposal options. The hazardous waste criteria for lead waste is established under RCRA, Subtitle C, as 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) measured with the TCLP as listed in CFR 40 Part 261. The lead-containing and lead-based paint debris generated during demolition should be handled in accordance with all applicable Federal and Georgia regulations.

4.0 Additional Environmental Considerations

Arc Environmental conducted a visual inspection for Universal Wastes (UWs) and other potentially regulated and hazardous wastes within the project area. As per 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261 Subpart C, UWs include any of the following six wastes that have at least one hazardous characteristic: batteries, pesticides, thermostats, cathode ray tubes, mercury-containing devices, and mercury-containing lamps (e.g., fluorescent tubes and high intensity discharge lamps). These wastes require proper handling and disposal methods when no longer in use or prior to completing any planned renovation/demolition activities. All identified Universal and potentially regulated wastes must be handled, transported, and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations prior to the renovation of the Site.

4.1 Mercury

Arc Environmental observed light bulbs which are suspect of containing mercury vapor. Mercury containing bulbs will require proper removal and disposal in accordance with USEPA regulations listed in 40 CFR Part 273.

4.2 Mold

Arc Environmental observed suspect microbial (mold) growth on a number of surfaces within the structure. Visible surface mold appeared to be present on wallpaper coverings and on woodwork throughout the first floor; the surface growth is likely the result of uncontrolled, elevated relative humidity within the impacted spaces. Suspect microbial growth was also noted on water-damaged materials such as ceilings and walls, particularly in the attic bedroom and northeast wing of the Second Floor.

Remediation of moisture damage, moisture intrusion, and suspect microbial growth may be required based on the construction project scope. If moisture intrusion sources and indoor relative humidity are not controlled, additional water damage and/or microbial growth may occur.

Appendix A

Asbestos Bulk Sampling Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

10752 Baltimore Avenue Beltsville, MD 20705

Tel/Fax: (301) 937-5700 / (301) 937-5701 http://www.EMSL.com / beltsvillelab@emsl.com

192301676EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARCE78

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Stacy Kahatapitiya (443) 864-7464

Fax:Arc Environmental (410) 962-1065

Received Date:1311 Haubert Street 02/27/2023 1:36 PM

Analysis Date:Baltimore, MD 21230 03/03/2023 - 03/06/2023

Collected Date: 02/22/2023

Project: CUIS - GRANGE

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CUIS-B/1

192301676-0001

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

40%

2%

33%

Cellulose10%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER WALL -

2ND BEDRM, SE

CORNER (YELLOW)

CUIS-B/2

192301676-0002

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

50%

32%

Cellulose8%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER CEIL -

ATTIC

CUIS-B/3

192301676-0003

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Gypsum

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

30%

6%

27%

Cellulose7%Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

DRYWALL - ATTIC

BATHRM

CUIS-B/4-Drywall

192301676-0004

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Gypsum

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

20%

7%

35%

Cellulose8%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

DRYWALL & JOINT

CMPD - ATTIC CEIL

CUIS-B/4-Joint

Compound

192301676-0004A

2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

6%

34%

Cellulose8%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

DRYWALL & JOINT

CMPD - ATTIC CEIL

CUIS-B/5

192301676-0005

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

50%

30%

Cellulose10%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER WALL -

ATTIC

CUIS-B/6

192301676-0006

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

40%

37%

Cellulose8%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER WALL -

ATTIC

CUIS-B/7

192301676-0007

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

50%

4%

23%

Cellulose8%Brown/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER WALL -

ATTIC

CUIS-B/8

192301676-0008

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

40%

Wollastonite<1%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WINDOW GLAZING -

ATTIC

CUIS-B/9

192301676-0009

4% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

5%

41%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE - FN

PATTERN - ATTIC

CUIS-B/10

192301676-0010

2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

7%

41%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE - FN

PATTERN - ATTIC

CUIS-B/11

192301676-0011

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

6%

34%

Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

BLACK SINK

UNDERCOATING -

KIT

CUIS-B/12

192301676-0012

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

8%

32%

Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

BLACK SINK

UNDERCOATING -

KIT

CUIS-B/13

192301676-0013

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

30%

47%

Cellulose8%Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER -

LAUNDRY RM

Initial report from: 03/06/2023 12:55:43

Page 1 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/6/2023 12:55 PM

Tel/Fax: (301) 937-5700 / (301) 937-5701 http://www.EMSL.com / beltsvillelab@emsl.com

192301676EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARCE78

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CUIS-B/14

192301676-0014

30% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

6%

21%

Cellulose3%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

RESILIENT SHEET

GOODS - LAUNDRY

RM

CUIS-B/15

192301676-0015

15% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

2%

33%

Cellulose<1%Tan/Beige

Fibrous

Homogeneous

RESILIENT SHEET

GOODS - LAUNDRY

RM

CUIS-B/16

192301676-0016

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

6%

42%

Wollastonite2%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE - KIT

CUIS-B/17

192301676-0017

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

7%

41%

Wollastonite2%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE - KIT

CUIS-B/18

192301676-0018

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

8%

42%

Cellulose<1%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE - KIT

CUIS-B/19-Floor Tile

192301676-0019

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

4%

46%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 WHITE FT W/

TAN MSTC -

PANTRY

CUIS-B/19-Mastic

192301676-0019A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

5%

80%

Cellulose<1%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 WHITE FT W/

TAN MSTC -

PANTRY

CUIS-B/20-Floor Tile

192301676-0020

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

3%

47%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 WHITE FT W/

TAN MSTC - KIT

CUIS-B/20-Mastic

192301676-0020A

Layer Not Present12X12 WHITE FT W/

TAN MSTC - KIT

CUIS-B/21-Floor Tile

192301676-0021

4% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

4%

42%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 GRAY FT W/

TAN MSTC - 2ND

LYR - KIT

CUIS-B/21-Mastic

192301676-0021A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

6%

64%

Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 GRAY FT W/

TAN MSTC - 2ND

LYR - KIT

CUIS-B/22-Floor Tile

192301676-0022

4% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

5%

41%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 GRAY FT W/

TAN MSTC - 2ND

LYR - KIT

CUIS-B/22-Mastic

192301676-0022A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

3%

74%

Cellulose8%Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 GRAY FT W/

TAN MSTC - 2ND

LYR - KIT

CUIS-B/23-Floor Tile

192301676-0023

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

3%

43%

Synthetic4%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 BEIGE FT W/

MSTC - 2ND LYR -

BUTLER'S PANTRY

CUIS-B/23-Mastic

192301676-0023A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

5%

74%

Cellulose6%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 BEIGE FT W/

MSTC - 2ND LYR -

BUTLER'S PANTRY

CUIS-B/24-Floor Tile

192301676-0024

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

5%

40%

Cellulose

Synthetic

<1%

5%

Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 BEIGE FT W/

MSTC - 2ND LYR -

BUTLER'S PANTRY

CUIS-B/24-Mastic

192301676-0024A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

6%

76%

Cellulose3%Yellow/Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 BEIGE FT W/

MSTC - 2ND LYR -

BUTLER'S PANTRY

CUIS-B/25-Linoleum

192301676-0025

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

6%

44%

Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 TAN PEEL &

STICK LINO TILES -

BATHRM

CUIS-B/25-Mastic

192301676-0025A

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

12%

20%

62%

Cellulose6%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 TAN PEEL &

STICK LINO TILES -

BATHRM

Page 2 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/6/2023 12:55 PM

Tel/Fax: (301) 937-5700 / (301) 937-5701 http://www.EMSL.com / beltsvillelab@emsl.com

192301676EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARCE78

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CUIS-B/26-Linoleum

192301676-0026

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

6%

44%

Cellulose<1%Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 TAN PEEL &

STICK LINO TILES -

BATHRM

CUIS-B/26-Mastic

192301676-0026A

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

35%

42%

Cellulose8%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

12X12 TAN PEEL &

STICK LINO TILES -

BATHRM

CUIS-B/27

192301676-0027

2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

42%

Wollastonite6%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE -

FAN PATTERN -

PIANO RM

CUIS-B/28-Floor Tile

192301676-0028

5% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

55%

40%

Gray/Blue

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X12 GRAY FAUX

SLATE FT - PIANO

RM

CUIS-B/28-Mastic

192301676-0028A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)60%Cellulose

Synthetic

25%

15%

Brown/Gray/Clear

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X12 GRAY FAUX

SLATE FT - PIANO

RM

CUIS-B/29-Floor Tile

192301676-0029

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

45%

Synthetic5%Gray/Tan/Blue

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X16 FAUX SLATE

FT - LIVING RM

CUIS-B/29-Adhesive

192301676-0029A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

75%

Cellulose

Synthetic

5%

10%

Brown/Gray/Yellow

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X16 FAUX SLATE

FT - LIVING RM

CUIS-B/30-Floor Tile

192301676-0030

4% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

55%

41%

Gray/Blue

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X12 GRAY FAUX

SLATE FT - FAMILY

RM

CUIS-B/30-Mastic

192301676-0030A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)45%Cellulose

Synthetic

40%

15%

Brown/Gray/Yellow

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

12X12 GRAY FAUX

SLATE FT - FAMILY

RM

CUIS-B/31

192301676-0031

<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

35%

30%

30%

Cellulose5%Tan/White/Beige

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

CEIL TEXTURE -

FAN PATTERN -

FOYER

Suggest TEM NOB!!!!!!

CUIS-B/32

192301676-0032

75% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)25%Gray/White/Rust

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

DUCT WRAP -

CRAWLSPACE

CUIS-B/33-Skim Coat

192301676-0033

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

80%

20%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER -

BASEMENT ENTRY

WALL, BACK RIGHT

CUIS-B/33-Rough Coat

192301676-0033A

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

70%

10%

Cellulose20%Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER -

BASEMENT ENTRY

WALL, BACK RIGHT

CUIS-B/34

192301676-0034

25% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose55%Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

DUCT WRAP -

BASEMENT @

GREEN DOOR

CUIS-B/35

192301676-0035

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

10%

Cellulose25%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

DEBRIS -

BASEMENT

CUIS-B/36

192301676-0036

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

70%

10%

Cellulose20%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL PANEL -

BASEMENT

CUIS-B/37

192301676-0037

None DetectedQuartz

Gypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

25%

70%

5%

Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WALL SKIM OVER

BRICK - BASEMENT,

BACK RM

CUIS-B/38

192301676-0038

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

25%

65%

10%

Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WALL SKIM OVER

BRICK - BASEMENT,

BACK RM

Page 3 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/6/2023 12:55 PM

Tel/Fax: (301) 937-5700 / (301) 937-5701 http://www.EMSL.com / beltsvillelab@emsl.com

192301676EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARCE78

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CUIS-B/39

192301676-0039

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

25%

70%

5%

Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WALL SKIM OVER

BRICK - BASEMENT,

BACK RM

No Skim Coat just paint on surface.

CUIS-B/40

192301676-0040

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

70%

5%

Cellulose25%Tan/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER -

BASEMENT, FRONT

ENT @ RIGHT WALL

No Skim Coat just paint on surface.

CUIS-B/41

192301676-0041

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

70%

5%

Cellulose25%Tan/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PLASTER -

BASEMENT

No Skim Coat just paint on surface.

CUIS-B/42

192301676-0042

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

5%

Cellulose30%Tan/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

CEIL PANEL DEBRIS

- BASEMENT

CRAWLSPACE

No Skim Coat just paint on surface.

CUIS-B/43

192301676-0043

3% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

75%

22%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WINDOW GLAZING,

EXT, LEFT

CUIS-B/44

192301676-0044

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

75%

25%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WINDOW GLAZING,

EXT, RIGHT

CUIS-B/45

192301676-0045

None DetectedQuartz

Non-fibrous (Other)

35%

57%

Fibrous (Other)8%Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

STUCCO (B WALL)

CUIS-B/46

192301676-0046

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

80%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

EXT DOOR CAULK

(A WALL)

CUIS-B/47

192301676-0047

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

25%

75%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WINDOW CAULK (B

SIDE)

CUIS-B/48

192301676-0048

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

10%

50%

Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

STUCCO (A SIDE)

CUIS-B/49

192301676-0049

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

25%

75%

Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

WINDOW CAULK (C

WALL)

CUIS-B/50

192301676-0050

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

65%

Fibrous (Other)5%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

DOOR CAULK (C

WALL)

CUIS-B/51

192301676-0051

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

40%

10%

50%

Gray/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

STUCCO (D WALL)

CUIS-B/52

192301676-0052

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

70%

Glass15%Gray/Black/Green

Fibrous

Homogeneous

ASPHALT ROOF

SHINGLE

CUIS-B/53

192301676-0053

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

70%

Glass15%Gray/Black/Green

Fibrous

Homogeneous

ASPHALT ROOF

SHINGLE

CUIS-B/54

192301676-0054

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

50%

Cellulose35%Gray/White/Silver

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PENETRATION

CAULK

CUIS-B/55

192301676-0055

4% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

56%

Cellulose25%Gray/White/Silver

Fibrous

Homogeneous

PENETRATION

CAULK

CUIS-B/56

192301676-0056

2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

63%

Cellulose25%White/Black/Silver

Fibrous

Homogeneous

ROOF MATRIX

Page 4 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/6/2023 12:55 PM

Tel/Fax: (301) 937-5700 / (301) 937-5701 http://www.EMSL.com / beltsvillelab@emsl.com

192301676EMSL Order:

Customer ID: ARCE78

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

CUIS-B/57

192301676-0057

<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

50%

Cellulose40%White/Black/Silver

Fibrous

Homogeneous

ROOF MATRIX

CUIS-B/58

192301676-0058

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

65%

Cellulose20%White/Black/Blue

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

SILVER, MOPPED

ON ROOF (FLAT)

TAR

CUIS-B/59

192301676-0059

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

70%

Cellulose15%White/Black/Blue

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

SILVER ROOF TAR

(FLAT)

CUIS-B/60

192301676-0060

20% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

70%

Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

BLACK CHIMNEY

FLASHING

CUIS-B/61

192301676-0061

18% ChrysotileCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

72%

Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

BLACK CHIMNEY

FLASHING

Analyst(s)

George Malone (8)

Joe Centifonti (30)

Ryan Manion (35)

Joe Centifonti, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.

Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 “Interim Method”) but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 (”final”) version of the method. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Beltsville, MD NVLAP Lab Code 200293-0

Page 5 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/6/2023 12:55 PM

OrderID: 192301676

HBALAB

P.O. Box 8798

Jacksonville, FL 32239 Mobile Office (904) 200-2247

Telephone/Facsimile (904) 744-4000

File Number: 12-10041

Project Name: Cumberland Island / Grange House – Basement / Darcco Job#11377-AB

Client Name: Darcco Environmentl, Inc.

LAB CLIENT IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION ASBESTOS NON-ASBESTOS FIBERS BINDERS

NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE

10041-1 1A Duct Wrap white fibrous 90% Chrysotile 10% Binders

Asbestos

10041-1L2 Duct Mastic black NAD 100% Binders

10041-2 2A Ceiling white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binders

Old Boiler Area

10041-3 2B Ceiling white fibrous 10% Chrysotile 1% Cellulose 89% Binders

Old Boiler Area Asbestos

10041-4 2C Ceiling white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binders

Old Boiler Area

10041-5 3A Ceiling white fibrous 7% Chrysotile 2% Cellulose 91% Binders

Entrance Hall Asbestos

10041-6 3B Ceiling white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binder

By Stairs

10041-7 3C Ceiling white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binders st Rm to Right

10041-8 4A Wall white fibrous 5% Chrysotile 3% Cellulose 92% Binders

Entrance Right Asbestos

10041-9 4B Wall white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binders st Rm to Right

10041-10 4C Wall white fibrous NAD 35% Cellulose 65% Binders

Larger Rm to Left

NAD = No Asbestos Detected Due to the limitations of Method EPA/600/R-93/116, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar non-friable materials. TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine the conclusive content. All percentages recorded on this report are by Calibrated Visual

Estimations utilizing EPA “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116) This report relates only to the items tested.

Toll Free: 866.639.6442 Mobile Office: 904.200.2247 Email: hbassocllc@yahoo.com Lynn@acmlabsjax.com

P.O. Box 8798 Jacksonville, FL 32239 www.acmlabsjax.com

H/B Associates

SENT VIA EMAIL: carl_david@nps.gov

June 15, 2015

Mr. Carl David Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street St Marys, GA 31558 Telephone (912) 674-5195

RE: PLM Analysis – Bulk Asbestos Identification Grange (Piano Room & Kitchen) / Suspect Floor Tile

HBA#15-10345 / PLM#15-0925

Dear Mr. David, Please find the attached analysis of the two (2) suspect floor tile samples retrieved on June 8, 2015 and analyzed for bulk asbestos identification. The sample (s) were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy coupled with dispersion staining in general accordance with EPA 600/M4-82-020 and EPA 600/R-93/116 (July 1993).

Sample 1 – 8% Chrysotile Asbestos was indeed detected in the grey floor tile sample from the Piano Room. (See Lab Results) Sample 2 – No Asbestos was Detected (NAD) in the white floor tile sample from the Kitchen. (See Lab Results)

Please call us if we may be of any further assistance or answer any questions. Thank you very much.

Sincerely, A. Lynn Bundoc Microscopist attachment: lab results a Subsidiary to Henderson/Bundoc Associates, LLC p.o. box 8798, Jacksonville, fl 32239 toll free (866) 639-6442 mobile (904) 200-2247 www.acmlabsjax.com

NAD = No Asbestos Detected Due to the limitations of Method EPA/600/R-93/116, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting small concentrations of asbestos in floor tiles and similar non-friable materials. TEM is currently the only method that can be used to determine the conclusive content. All percentages recorded on this report are by Calibrated Visual Estimations utilizing EPA “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116) This report relates only to the items tested.

File Number: 06082015-PLM15-0925 Report Date: 6/15/2015 Microscopist:

Project Name: Grange (Piano Room & Kitchen) / Suspect Floor Tile - Bulk Asbestos Identification

Client Name: Cumberland Island National Seashore c/o Mr. Carl David, 101 Wheeler St, St. Marys, GA 31558

These analytical results are for the suspect sample(s) received on June 8, 2015 and analyzed for bulk asbestos identification. The sample(s) were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy coupled with dispersion staining in general accordance with EPA 600/M4-82-020 and EPA 600/R-93/116 (July 1993).

LAB

NUMBER

CLIENT

NUMBER IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION

ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS

TYPE

NON-

ASBESTOS

NON-

ASBESTOS

FIBERS % BINDERS

0925-1 Grange-

Floor Tile / Piano Room Grey Tile 8 Chrysotile 92

Carbonates Binders

Yellow Adhesive 0 NAD 10 Wollastonite 90 Binders

0925-2 Grange-

Floor Tile / Kitchen White Tile 0 NAD 100

Brown/Yellow Adhesive 0 NAD 5 Wollastonite 95 Binders

White Powder (Leveling Compound) 0 NAD 100 https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23949&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1418.jpg https://mail.aol.com/webmail/getPart?uid=23580&partId=2&saveAs=IMAG1247.jpg

Appendix B

Summary of Materials Tested for Asbestos

Summary of Sampled Suspect Materials Homogeneous

Area Material Description Sample Numbers Results

PL1 Plaster B/1, B/2, B/5, B/6, B/7, B/13, B/22, B/40, B/41 Non-detect

DW1 Drywall B/3, B/4 Non-detect JC1 Joint compound B/14 2% Chrysotile B/8 Interior window glazing B/8 Non-detect

TX1 Fan-pattern ceiling texture B/9, B/10, B/27, B/31 <1 – 4% Chrysotile

TX2 Ceiling texture B/16, B/17, B/18 Non-detect

SI1 Black sink undercoating B/11, B/12 Non-detect

RS1 Resilient sheet goods B/14, B/15 15 - 30% Chrysotile FT1 12” x 12” white floor tile B/19, B/20 Non-detect

FM1 Tan floor tile mastic associated with FT1 B/19, B/20 Non-detect

FT2 12” x 12” grey floor tile B/21, B/22 4% Chrysotile

FM2 Tan floor tile mastic associated with FT2 B/21, B/22 Non-detect

FT3 12” x 12” beige floor tile B/23, B/24 Non-detect

FM3 Clear floor tile mastic associated with FT3 B/23, B/24 Non-detect

FT4 12” x 12” tan linoleum floor tiles B/25, B/26 Non-detect

FM4 Clear floor tile mastic associated with FT4 B/25, B/26 Non-detect

FT5 12” x 12” faux slate floor tile B/28, B/30 4 - 5% Chrysotile

FM5 Tan floor tile mastic associated with FT5 B/28, B/30 Non-detect

FT6 12” x 18” faux slate floor tile B/29 Non-detect

FM6 Tan floor tile mastic associated with FT6 B/29 Non-detect

DI1 Duct wrap B/32, B34 25 – 75% Chrysotile

CT1 Ceiling panels & debris B/35, B/36, B/42 Non-detect

PL2 Wall skim B/37, B/38, B/39 Non-detect

WG1 Exterior window glazing B/43, B/44 0 – 3% Chrysotile

ST1 Stucco B/45, B/48, B/51 Non-detect

CK1 Exterior door caulk B/46, B/50 Non-detect

CK2 Exterior window caulk B/47, B/49 Non-detect

Summary of Sampled Suspect Materials Homogeneous

Area Material Description Sample Numbers Results

AS1 Asphalt roof shingle B/52, B/53 Non-detect

CK3 Penetration caulk B/54, B/55 0 – 4% Chrysotile

RM1 Built-up roof matrix B/56, B/57 <1 – 2% Chrysotile

AT1 Silver roof tar B/58, B/59 Non-detect

AF1 Chimney flashing tar B/60, B/61 18 – 20% Chrysotile

Non-Detect: No Asbestos Detected

Appendix C Lead-based Paint Data Sheets

Inspection Date: February 22, 2023 Abatement Level: 1.0

Reading No. Wall

Room Floor Component Substrate Paint Condition Color

Lead (mg/cm2)

Mode Classification

001 Calibration 0.8 TC N/A 002 Calibration 0.9 TC N/A 003 Calibration 0.9 TC N/A 004 A Main Hall First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper -0.4 QM Negative 005 B Main Hall First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper -0.1 QM Negative 006 C Main Hall First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper -0.3 QM Negative 007 D Main Hall First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper -0.2 QM Negative 008 D Main Hall First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 009 C Main Hall First Trim Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 010 C Main Hall First Door trim Wood Intact Green -0.2 QM Negative 011 C Main Hall First Door Wood Intact Off white -0.2 QM Negative 012 B Main Hall First Door Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 013 B Main Hall First Door trim Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 014 C Main Hall First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 015 B Main Hall First Baseboard Wood Intact Green -0.3 QM Negative 016 B Main Hall First Stringer Wood Intact Green -0.3 QM Negative 017 B Main Hall First Stringer trim Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 018 B Main Hall First Tread Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 019 B Main Hall First Ballusler Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 020 B Main Hall First Handrail Wood Intact Varnish -0.2 QM Negative 021 B Main Hall First Door trim Wood Intact Green 0.0 QM Negative 022 B Main Hall First Door jamb Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 023 B Main Hall First Door casing Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 024 A Main Hall First Window Casing Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 025 A Main Hall First Window trim Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 026 A Main Hall First Window sash Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 027 A Main Hall First Front door Wood Deteriorated Off white >9.9 QM Positive 028 A Main Hall First Door trim Wood Intact Green -0.3 QM Negative 029 A Main Hall First Window sill Wood Intact Green -0.2 QM Negative 030 D Main Hall First Baseboard Wood Intact Green -0.1 QM Negative 031 D Main Hall First Fireplace mantel Wood Intact Green -0.3 QM Negative

XRF Lead-Based Paint Testing Data Sheet

GWWO

CUIS Grange Rehabilitation

P:\IH\Projects 2023\GWWO\155-23 Historic Grange at Cumberland Island Nat'l Seashore Rehabilition\ CUIS Grange XRF Data Page 1 of 15

No. Wall

Room Floor Component Substrate Paint Condition Color

Lead (mg/cm2)

Mode Classification

XRF Lead-Based Paint Testing Data Sheet

GWWO

CUIS Grange Rehabilitation

032 D Main Hall First Fireplace trim Wood Intact Green 0.0 QM Negative 033 D Main Hall First Fireplace front Concrete Intact Red -0.2 QM Negative 034 D Main Hall First Fireplace front Concrete Intact Off white -0.3 QM Negative 035 D Main Hall First Fireplace floor trim Wood Deteriorated Gray -0.2 QM Negative 036 D Main Hall First Pocket doors Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 037 A Living Room First Wall Plaster Intact Off white -0.2 QM Negative 038 A Living Room First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white -0.2 QM Negative 039 B Living Room First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white 0.1 QM Negative 040 B Living Room First Door casing Wood Intact Tan 0.1 QM Negative 041 D Living Room First Baseboard Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 042 D Living Room First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white -0.2 QM Negative 043 D Living Room First Wainscotting Wood Intact Off white -0.2 QM Negative 044 D Living Room First Window wall Wood Intact Tan -0.3 QM Negative

045 D Living Room First Decorative window balluster Wood Intact Off white -0.1 QM Negative

046 D Living Room First Window casing Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 047 D Living Room First Window sill Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 048 D Living Room First Window lintel Wood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 049 D Living Room First Bookcase Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 050 D Living Room First Shelf Wood Intact Tan -0.2 QM Negative 051 C Living Room First Beadboard Wood Intact Tan -0.3 QM Negative 052 B Living Room First Window panel Wood Intact Off white -0.1 QM Negative 053 B Living Room First Baseboard Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 054 A Living Room First Window sill Wood Intact Tan 0.1 QM Negative 055 A Living Room First Window sash Woood Intact Off white >9.9 QM Positive 056 B Living Room First Fireplace trim Wood Intact Tan 0.4 QM Negative 057 B Living Room First Fireplace corbel Block Intact Red 0.8 QM Inconclusive 058 B Living Room First Fireplace trim Wood Intact Tan 0.4 QM Negative

059 B Living Room First Fireplace decortive trim Metal Intact Black 0.1 QM Negative

060 B Living Room First Fireplace hearth extension Block Intact Red 0.3 QM Negative

CUIS Grange XRF Data Page 2 of 15

No. Wall

Room Floor Component Substrate Paint Condition Color

Lead (mg/cm2)

Mode Classification

XRF Lead-Based Paint Testing Data Sheet

GWWO

CUIS Grange Rehabilitation

061 B Living Room First Fireplace threshold Wood Intact Grey -0.3 QM Negative 062 B Living Room First Bookcase Wood Intact Tan -0.2 QM Negative 063 C Living Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 064 - Living Room First Ceiling Plaster Intact White -0.4 QM Negative 065 B Living Room First Crown molding Wood Intact Off-white 0.0 QM Negative 066 C Living Room First Crown molding Wood Intact Off-white 0.0 QM Negative 067 A Sun Room First Wall Concrete Intact Mural 7.1 QM Positive 068 B Sun Room First Wall Concrete Intact Mural >9.9 QM Positive 069 C Sun Room First Wall Concrete Deteriorated Mural 9.6 QM Positive 070 D Sun Room First Wall Concrete Intact Mural 6.7 QM Positive 071 D Sun Room First Window sill Wood Intact Off-white -0.1 QM Negative 072 C Sun Room First Window casing Wood Intact Off-white 3.2 QM Positive 073 C Sun Room First Window sash Wood Intact Off-white 2.7 QM Positive 074 C Sun Room First Window sill Wood Intact Off-white -0.3 QM Negative 075 - Sun Room First Floor Block Deteriorated Beige -0.5 QM Negative 076 C Sun Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white -0.2 QM Negative 077 C Sun Room First Door trim Wood Intact Off-white 4.1 QM Positive 078 C Sun Room First Door transom Wood Intatct Off-white 3.1 QM Positive 079 C Sun Room First Transom trim Wood Intact Off-white 3.8 QM Positive 080 C Sun Room First Window side trim Wood Intact Off-white 4.3 QM Positive 081 B Sun Room First Window sill Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 082 B Sun Room First Window sash Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 083 B Sun Room First Window casing Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 084 A Sun Room First Threshold Wood Intact Grey >9.9 QM Positive 085 A Sun Room First Door trim Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 086 A Sun Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 087 A Sun Room First Upper wall Concrete Intact White 7.4 QM Positive 088 C Sun Room First Upper wall Concrete Intact White 6.6 QM Positive 089 A Dining Room First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper 0.0 QM Negative 090 B Dining Room First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper 0.3 QM Negative 091 B Dining Room First Chimney Plaster Intact Off-white -0.1 QM Negative

CUIS Grange XRF Data Page 3 of 15

No. Wall

Room Floor Component Substrate Paint Condition Color

Lead (mg/cm2)

Mode Classification

XRF Lead-Based Paint Testing Data Sheet

GWWO

CUIS Grange Rehabilitation

092 C Dining Room First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper 0.0 QM Negative 093 D Dining Room First Wall Plaster Intact Wallpaper -0.2 QM Negative 094 A Dining Room First Door trim Wood Intact Tan 0.0 QM Negative 095 A Dining Room First Door jamb Wood Intact Tan 0.2 QM Negative 096 A Dining Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white -0.1 QM Negative 097 D Dining Room First Chair rail Wood Intact Tan 0.0 QM Negative 098 D Dining Room First Door trim Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 099 D Dining Room First Window Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 100 D Dining Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 101 C Dining Room First Window Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 102 C Dining Room First Window trim Wood Intact Tan 0.0 QM Negative 103 C Dining Room First Window sill Wood Intact Tan 0.1 QM Negative 104 C Dining Room First Chair rail Wood Intact Tan 0.0 QM Negative 105 C Dining Room First Window apron Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 106 B Dining Room First Baseboard Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 107 B Dining Room First Fireplace front Concrete Intact Red -0.8 QM Negative

108 B Dining Room First Fireplace hearth extension Concrete Intact Red -0.3 QM Negative

109 B Dining Room First Hearth trim Metal Intact Black 1.6 QM Positive 110 B Dining Room First Door Wood Intact Off-white -0.2 QM Negative 111 B Dining Room First Door trim Wood Intact Tan -0.3 QM Negative 112 - Dining Room First Crown molding Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative 113 - Dining Room First Ceiling Drywall Intact White -0.1 QM Negative 114 B Dining Room First Fireplace mantel Wood Intact Tan -0.2 QM Negative 115 A Dining Room First Baseboard Wood Intact Tan -0.2 QM Negative 116 A Kitchen First Wall Plaster Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 117 B Kitchen First Wall Plaster Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 118 C Kitchen First Wall Plaster Intact Off-white >9.9 QM Positive 119 D Kitchen First Wall Plaster Intact Off-white -0.3 QM Negative 120 D Kitchen First Cabinet Wood Intact Tan -0.3 QM Negative 121 D Kitchen First Cabinet Wood Intact Tan -0.1 QM Negative

CUIS Grange XRF Data Page 4 of 15

No. Wall

Room Floor Component Substrate Paint Condition Color

Lead (mg/cm2)

Mode Classification

XRF Lead-Based Paint Testing Data Sheet

GWWO

CUIS Grange Rehabilitation

122 C Kitchen First Cabinet Wood Intact Tan -0.2 QM Negative 123 C Kitchen First Cabinet interior Wood Intact White 7.9 TC Positive 124 D Kitchen First Cabinet shelf Wood Intact White -0.2 TC Negative 125 D Kitchen First Cabinet interior Wood Intact White -0.3 TC Negative 126 A Kitchen First Wainscotting Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 127 A Kitchen First Chair rail Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 128 A Kitchen First Door trim Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 129 A Kitchen First Door header Wood Intact White >9.9 TC Positive 130 B Kitchen First Casing Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 131 D Kitchen First 2" baseboard Wood Intact Tan -0.2 TC Negative 132 C Kitchen First 4" baseboard Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 133 C Kitchen First Window sill Wood Intact Tan 0.3 TC Negative 134 C Kitchen First Window apron Wood Intact Tan 2.5 TC Positive 135 C Kitchen First Wainscotting Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 136 C Kitchen First Window casing Wood Intact Tan 7.2 TC Positive 137 C Kitchen First Window Wood Intact Off-white >9.9 TC Positive 138 C Kitchen First Window jamb Wood Intact Off-white -0.2 TC Negative 139 C Kitchen First Sink cabinet Wood Intact Tan -0.2 TC Negative 140 C Kitchen First Sink cabinet interior Wood Intact White -0.2 TC Negative 141 - Kitchen First Island cabinet Wood Intact Tan -0.2 TC Negative 142 B Kitchen First Door Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 143 B Kitchen First Door trim Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 144 B Kitchen First Door jamb Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 145 B Kitchen First Chair rail Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 146 B Kitchen First Wainscotting Wood Intact Tan >9.9 TC Positive 147 - Kitchen First Ceiling Plaster Intact Off-white -0.1 TC Negative 148 A Laundry First Wall Plaster Intact…