B08-Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Transient Alert Services for Stuttgart Army Airfield (SAAF)
Solicitation number
W91WFU22Q0002
Issued by

About this file

This past performance questionnaire requests information about a contractor's performance on a previous contract to provide transient alert services at Stuttgart Army Airfield in Germany. The solicitation number is W91WFU22Q0002 and is for non-personal services including providing all qualified personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, training, and other items necessary to perform transient alert services. Respondents are asked to evaluate the contractor's performance on areas such as overall fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate using defined assessment criteria. The questionnaire also asks if the respondent would award this firm another contract and whether the previous contract was terminated for default or cause.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The 409th Contracting Support Brigade is conducting a competitive competition. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Solicitation Number, W91WFU22Q0002 is for nonperson services Transient Alert Services for Stuttgart Army Airfield (SAAF)

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than [Enter date] to [Enter point of contact information].

Part 1:

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime
Subcontractor
Teaming Partner
Joint Venture

Part 2:

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided service IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Compliance of Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed and retained qualified personnel with minimal disruption.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified and trained personnel IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .