B08 Attachment 2 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form- Upgrade Building 51002 for Mailroom.pdf
PDF 81 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9124A22R0014
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire form for a firm fixed-price, lowest priced technically acceptable contract to upgrade Building 51002 for a mailroom at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The solicitation seeks proposals to perform upgrade work on the specified building located at Fort Huachuca, with proposals due by August 8, 2022. The contract is set aside for small businesses and falls under North American Industry Classification System code 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction. The applicable wage determination is included. The awarded contractor must provide sufficient bonding within 10 calendar days of award.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
To be completed and e-mailed to the Contract Specialist and
Contracting Officer See Proposal Preparation Instructions in the Instructions to
Proposers Section of the Solicitation
Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________ POC:________________________ Title:________________________ (Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following ratings shall be used in your response.
EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort (Must be related to Upgrade Building):
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship �Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
�Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
C. Timeliness of Performance.
�Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
�Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) �Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date Typed or Printed Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .