B04_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf
PDF 173 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HEAVY EQUIPMENT REPAIR(BACKHOE)I00175E
- Solicitation number
- 140L6426Q0025
About this file
This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 providing instructions and evaluation criteria for a commercial items acquisition for heavy equipment repair services.
The acquisition is being solicited as a total small business set-aside under FAR Part 12 and will be awarded on a firm fixed price basis to the offeror whose quote represents the best value to the Government. Offerors must submit three items: (1) a Technical Statement demonstrating understanding of heavy equipment repair requirements, including quality control and delivery schedule details; (2) three references for similar services completed within the last three years with type of service, date, and point of contact; and (3) pricing including part costs, labor costs, quantity, price per unit, and total price. Questions must be submitted in writing to Lisa Hariper at lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov by 3:00 PM PDT on August 5, 2026, and completed quotes must be submitted electronically to the same contact by 3:00 PM PDT on August 12, 2026. Contract award will be based on four evaluation factors: Technical Approach (rated as High, Some, or Low Confidence), Past Experience (rated as High, Some, or Low Confidence), Past Performance (rated as High, Some, Low, or Neutral Confidence based on submitted references and relevant prior work), and Total Price (evaluated for reasonableness but not scored). All non-cost evaluation factors combined are weighted approximately equal to price in the best-value determination.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L6426Q0025_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| A04_SOW_Backhoe_repair_(002).pdf | ||
| B03_WD_Maricopa.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6426Q0025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items
This acquisition will be solicited and awarded in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12.
A Firm Fixed Price Contract will be awarded to the Offeror whose quote conforms to the solicitation requirements and represents the best value to the Government, in accordance with the evaluation factors defined below. Offerors must be deemed a responsible prospective contractor in accordance with (IAW)
FAR 9.1.
This acquisition is being solicited as a total small business set-aside.
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS: All quotes must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered nonresponsive. All quotes are expected to conform to the solicitation provisions and be prepared in accordance with this section.
Return the following items with your response:
a. Technical Statement: Offerors are required to demonstrate full understanding of the requirement. Include the following in your Technical Statement:
a. A thorough proposal that details the criteria for heavy equipment repair.
All necessary labor, equipment, and materials required to meet the requirements in accordance with the attached statement of work (SOW).
b. Quality Control.
c. Delivery schedule.
b. Past Performance/Experience -References: Submit three references for jobs for similar services completed within the last three years. Include type of service, approximate date, and point of contact for reference.
c. Price: Quote should include, part costs, labor costs, quantity, price each and total price.
QUESTIONS: All questions shall be submitted in writing via email to Lisa Hariper at lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov by 3:00pm PDT on August 5, 2026.
QUOTES: All quotes shall be submitted electronically to Lisa Hariper at lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov, by 3:00pm PDT on August 12, 2026.
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services
BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This contract will be awarded in accordance with FAR 12 and consider the following factors: Technical Approach, Past Experience, Past Performance, and Price. The Government will make a comparative best-value determination, in which all non-cost evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
mailto:lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov mailto:lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov
a. Factor 1 - Technical Approach: The Technical Approach Factor will receive a confidence rating, defined below, based on information submitted in the Technical Statement.
Technical Approach Rating Table
RATING DESCRIPTION
High Confidence The Government has high confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully with little or no need for Government intervention.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully even with Government intervention.
b. Factor 2 – Past Experience: The Past Experience Factor will receive a confidence rating, defined below, based on the Offeror’s demonstrated ability to provide the requisite experience to successfully complete the project.
Past Experience Rating Table
High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
c. Factor 3 – Past Performance: Past performance will be rated based on submitted references, and any other information deemed relevant by the Contracting Officer (e.g. prior work for the Department of the Interior, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System). Past performance projects deemed not relevant will not be considered. Projects deemed not current (greater than three years) will be disregarded. Offeror’s who lack recent or relevant past performance will be assigned an Neutral Confidence rating.
Past Performance Rating Table
High Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has high confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Some Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an Some confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Low Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has low confidence that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence No performance record is identifiable, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
d. Factor 4 - Total Price: Price will not be scored or rated but will be evaluated for reasonableness in
IAW FAR 12.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .