B04_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf
PDF 174 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Big Sandy NRCD Stock Tanks
- Solicitation number
- 140L6426Q0005
About this file
This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 providing instructions to offerors and evaluation criteria for a small business set-aside commercial items acquisition for stock tank fabrication and delivery. The Government will award a Firm Fixed Price contract to the offeror whose quote best represents value to the Government based on Technical Approach, Past Experience, Past Performance, and Price, with all non-cost evaluation factors combined being approximately equal to price.
Offerors must submit the following by 3:00 PM PST on April 29, 2026, to Lisa Hariper (lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov) and the BLM Arizona Procurement Inbox (blm_az_procurement@blm.gov): a Technical Statement demonstrating full understanding of stock tank fabrication processes including a project milestone schedule with completion and delivery within seven months of contract award, warranty information (minimum one-year coverage for workmanship and parts with maintenance availability within one week of report), three references for similar services completed within the last three years with contact information, and pricing per tank and total price. Questions must be submitted in writing by 3:00 PM PST on April 22, 2026. Evaluation criteria include Technical Approach, Past Experience, and Past Performance rated as High, Some, Low, or Neutral Confidence based on submitted documentation and contractor performance records. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness but not scored. Offerors must be deemed responsible prospective contractors per FAR 9.1, and incomplete submissions may be considered nonresponsive.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L6426Q0005_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Questions_Answers_Big_Sandy_NRCD_Stock_Tanks_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6426Q0005.pdf | ||
| A04_Big-Sandy-NRCD-Tanks-SOW-Updated.pdf | ||
| A05_Tank-Design.pdf | ||
| B01_Combined_Synopsis_and_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| B08__Value_Bid_Schedule.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items
This acquisition will be solicited and awarded in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 13.
A Firm Fixed Price Contract will be awarded to the Offeror whose quote conforms to the solicitation requirements and represents the best value to the Government, in accordance with the evaluation factors defined below. Offerors must be deemed a responsible prospective contractor in accordance with (IAW)
FAR 9.1.
This acquisition is being solicited as a total small business set-aside.
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS: All quotes must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered nonresponsive. All quotes are expected to conform to the solicitation provisions and be prepared in accordance with this section.
Return the following items with your response:
a. Technical Statement: Offerors are required to demonstrate full understanding of the requirement, to include the processes of fabricating the stock tanks. Include the following in your Technical Statement:
a. A schedule detailing project milestones. Stock Tanks must be completed and delivered within seven (7) months of contract award.
b. Warranty information (should include at least a one-year warranty for workmanship and parts).
c. Availability for maintenance completed under warranty (e.g. warranty work will be completed within one week of report date).
b. References: Submit three references for jobs for similar services completed within the last three years. Include type of service, approximate date, and point of contact for reference.
c. Price: Quote should include price per tank and total price, QUESTIONS: All questions shall be submitted in writing via email to Lisa Hariper at lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov by 3:00pm PST on April 22, 2026.
QUOTES: All quotes shall be submitted electronically to Lisa Hariper at lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov, and the BLM Arizona Procurement Inbox at blm_az_procurement@blm.gov, by 3:00pm PST on April 29, 2026.
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services
BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This contract will be awarded in accordance with FAR 13 and consider the following factors: Technical Approach, Past Experience, Past Performance, and Price. The mailto:lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov mailto:lisa_hariper@ios.doi.gov mailto:blm_az_procurement@blm.gov
Government will make a comparative best-value determination, in which all non-cost evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
a. Factor 1 - Technical Approach: The Technical Approach Factor will receive a confidence rating, defined below, based on information submitted in the Technical Statement.
Technical Approach Rating Table
RATING DESCRIPTION
High Confidence The Government has high confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully with little or no need for Government intervention.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence in the Offeror’s technical approach, and their ability to execute the contract successfully even with Government intervention.
b. Factor 2 – Past Experience: The Past Experience Factor will receive a confidence rating, defined below, based on the Offeror’s demonstrated ability to provide the requisite experience to successfully complete the project.
Past Experience Rating Table
High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Offeror has the experience, capacity, and expertise to successfully perform the contract with little or no Government intervention.
c. Factor 3 – Past Performance: Past performance will be rated based on submitted references, and any other information deemed relevant by the Contracting Officer (e.g. prior work for the Department of the Interior, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System). Past performance projects deemed not relevant will not be considered. Projects deemed not current (greater than three years) will be disregarded. Offeror’s who lack recent or relevant past performance will be assigned an Unknown Confidence rating.
Past Performance Rating Table
High Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has high confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Some Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an Some confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Low Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has low confidence that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence No performance record is identifiable, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
d. Factor 4 - Total Price: Price will not be scored or rated but will be evaluated for reasonableness in
IAW FAR 13.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .