B04_ATTACHMENT_003_-_PAST_PERFORMANCE.docx

DOCX document 79 KB Posted

Attached to
CUGA- 2INCH STEEL HANDRAILS
Solicitation number
140P5326R0025
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, to evaluate contractor performance on the Steel Handrails with Installation solicitation (140P5326R0025 CUGA). The questionnaire is designed as a two-part document where offerors complete Section A with basic project information, then send it to the relevant project owner or evaluator to complete Section B with performance ratings and supporting documentation. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to contracting point of contact Marilia Mateo@ios.doi.gov by the deadline specified in the solicitation, with late submissions not accepted.

Section B requires evaluators to rate contractor performance across nine criteria using a five-point scale (Outstanding, Above Average, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unacceptable), addressing relationship management, corporate integrity, quality control, schedule performance, any corrective actions issued, customer satisfaction, and likelihood of future contract award. Offerors may submit between two and five past performance questionnaires for evaluation, with projects completed within five years of the evaluated contract completion date. The questionnaire explicitly notes that information provided is source selection sensitive and cannot be used for promotional purposes or to imply government endorsement of the contractor's products or services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
QUESTIONS_0002.docx DOCX document
Sol_140P5326R0025_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5326R0025_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B04_ATTACHMENT_004_-_Construction_Contract_Administration.docx DOCX document
B03_Wage_Rate_Determination.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5326R0025.pdf PDF
A04_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Steel Handrails with Installation 140P5326R0025

CUGA -

Attachment #3

Department of Interior Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is considering the company listed below in Section A for a project opportunity - Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company's past performance.

Instructions:

1) The offeror is to complete only the information in Section A, then send the entire past performance questionnaire to project owner/evaluator for completion.

2) The project owner/evaluator (or reference) is to complete Section B, then send the entire past performance questionnaire back to the offeror to be provided with their complete proposal package, which will then be reviewed for evaluation.

3) The past performance questionnaire must be received by the contracting point of contact Marilia Mateo@ios.doi.gov by the date and time specified in the solicitation (or any amendments).

Please note that for electronic submissions, offerors should consider and account for potential delays in transmissions between when an electronic submission is submitted and when an electronic submission is received. Late past performance questionnaires will not be accepted.

4) One past performance questionnaire is to be used for each past performance project submitted. The offeror may submit between 2-5 past performance questionnaires for this solicitation. Past performance projects must have been completed within five years of the completion of performance of the evaluated contract or order.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

140P5326R0025 CUGA – Steel Handrails with Installation Attachment #3

Section A

Project Title:

Location:

Description:

Company Name:
Unique Entity ID/Cage Code:
Owner/Project Manager Name:
Email Address:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
Initial Amount:
Final Amount:

Section B

Evaluator

Evaluator Name: I Company/Agency Name:

Address: I POC Email:

Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:

Ratings Overview

Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

"O"
Outstanding
Performance greatly exceeded the

contract requirements.

"A"
Above Average
Performance exceeded the

contract requirements.

"S"
Satisfactory
Performance met the contract

requirements.

"M"
Marginal
Performance met the minimum contract requirements but Some material aspects of the

contractor's performance were less than satisfactory.

"U"
Unacceptable
Performance was poor and/or did

not satisfy contract requirements.

I IQuestionnaire Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.

1. The relationship between the company and client's/customer's contract team:

□0 □A □S □M □u

2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:

□0 □A □s □M □u

140P5326R0025 CUGA – Steel Handrails with Installation ment

Attachment #3

3. Quality control:
□0
□A
□s
□M

□u

4. Ability to meet the performance schedule:
□0
□A
□s
□M

□u

5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please

Yes

No explain:

6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain:

7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain:

8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

9. Overall Rating
□0
□A
□s
□M

□u

10. Comments

Evaluator Signature

Name
Date:

image1.jpeg image2.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .