B.08 Attach 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (26RA001).docx

DOCX document 46 KB Posted

Attached to
G4 - CGWY DFAC IDIQ
Solicitation number
W912L326RA001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for contractors responding to solicitation W912L326RA001, the Wyoming National Guard's IDIQ for meals upon order at Camp Guernsey, WY. The questionnaire serves as an evaluation tool to assess bidders' relevant past performance experience and capability to successfully execute the contract.

The template is structured to require contractors to provide detailed information about their previous similar projects, including client references, contract values, performance periods, and qualifications of key personnel. Contractors must demonstrate experience in food service operations, meal preparation and delivery, and dining facility management comparable to the scope of work at Camp Guernsey. The questionnaire evaluates factors such as contractor performance ratings, ability to meet quality standards, customer satisfaction, and past experience with government or military contracts. This past performance evaluation component is a standard requirement for IDIQ awards and will be used by the Wyoming Army National Guard to assess the technical capability and reliability of prospective vendors before contract award.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate)

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone #:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number and Dollar Amount Provided by Offeror:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

C. Email COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT: benjamin.c.taylor.mil@army.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY/ NO CONFIDENCE
MARGINAL/ LITTLE CONFIDNENCE
SATISFACTOR Y/SATISFACTO RY

CONFIDENCE

VERY GOOD/ SIGNIFICANT CONFIDENCE
EXCEPTIONAL/ HIGH CONFIDENCE
NEUTRAL/ UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.i

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: Supernatural Eats CONTRACT NUMBER W50S8W-22-P-0002

The contractor:

1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
1
2
3
4
5
6
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
1
2
3
4
5
6
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
1
2
3
4
5
6
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
13.
Met established project schedules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
1
2
3
4
5
6
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
1
2
3
4
5
6
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in- progress increased.
1
2
3
4
5
6

G4 – Camp Guernsey DFAC Services (26RA001) Camp Guernsey, WY

18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
1
2
3
4
5
6
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including

all aspects of work required for each task.

1
2
3
4
5
6
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
1
2
3
4
5
6
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
1
2
3
4
5
6
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced

contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Additional Remarks: CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .