B-52 Hazardous Material Report.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted Sep 6, 2024

Attached to: Amend 02 B-52 Windows Questions & Answers Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: W91QF4-24-B-0005
Issued by: Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Sep 6, 2024

This document is a federal contract opportunity for masonry and window repairs to Building 52 at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The solicitation includes a hazardous materials report that found asbestos-containing materials in the window caulking and roof flashing that will need to be addressed during the renovation work. The contract opportunity has a bid due date of September 10, 2024 and is being issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis. The contract documents include a Statement of Work, drawings, and a Q&A amendment. The hazardous materials report provides details on the locations and types of asbestos-containing materials found in Building 52.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Amend 02 B-52 Windows Questions & Answers, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Questions Answers_W91QF4 24 B 0005 B 52 Windows.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2024
SOW- B52 Window Replacement_REVISION 1-08292024.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2024
Amend 02_W91QF4-24-B-0005 B-52 Windows Rpl.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2024
Building 52 Window Drawing Set REVISION1-08292024.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2024

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Building 52 Infrastructure – Masonry and Window Repairs

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 100% Design Submittal

E-1 | P a g e

Environmental

Report

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Building 52 Infrastructure – Masonry and Window Repairs

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 100% Design Submittal

E-2 | P a g e

This page has been intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

DRAFT

ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

SERVICES REPORT

BUILDING 52,

FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS

Prepared For:

Yaeger Architecture, Inc.

7780 West 119th Street

Overland Park, KS 66213

Prepared by:

TEHAMA, LLC

1600 Genessee Street, Suite 860

Kansas City, MO 64102

PROJECT NO. F0073

November 2016

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Tehama, LLC (Tehama) has performed an exterior inspection of roofing materials and window caulking for the presence or absence of Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) for Building 52 located at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The inspection was conducted at the request of Yaeger Architecture, Inc. (Yaeger) for use in their upcoming infrastructure renovation design project for Building 52. The scope of work for this project was developed from a scope of work provided by Yaeger and from drawings and emails, and Tehama’s proposal dated September 6, 2016. The intent of this inspection was to locate, identify and quantify ACM that will be impacted during the exterior renovation of the building.

In addition to the ACM survey, Tehama inspected metal roof flashing material in the area where Sheridan Hall intersects with Grant Hall, near the clock tower. Based on visual observations made by Yaeger and other specialty subcontractors, there was some concern that the material was lead sheeting or was sheet metal coated with lead-based paint. Additional detail regarding the flashing material inspection and results can be found in Section 8.0 below.

Megan Perez-Utter, Jerrett Domling and Anne Eiseman, certified Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Asbestos Inspectors with Tehama performed the inspection on October 25 and 26, 2016. Certifications for Megan Perez, Jerrett Domling, and Anne Eiseman are located in Appendix A.

2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS

METHODS

Guidelines used for the inspection were established by the EPA in the Guidance for Controlling Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings, 40 CFR Part 763, 29 CFR 1926.1101, 40 CFR 61, 29 CFR 1910.134, AHERA, where applicable Kansas Statutes Annotated (K.S.A Chapter 65, Article 53), Kansas Administrative Regulations (K.A.R. 28-50-1 to 28-50-14).

Field information was organized in accordance with the AHERA methodology of homogenous area (HA). During the inspection, reasonable effort was made to identify all locations and types of ACM associated with the exterior window caulking and roofing materials. Bulk sampling for each HA was completed and specific sampling locations were chosen at random. A minimum of two samples of window caulking and roofing materials were collected in each of the six distinct building areas (Areas A through F).

All samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) as outlined in the EPA 600/R- 93/116 Method. The laboratory provides the approximate percentage of asbestos fibers in the sample and also identifies the crystal form of the asbestos. Materials are considered ACM if they contain greater than one-percent (1%) asbestos.

Tehama subcontracted laboratory analysis procedures to EMLab P&K located at 1150 Bayhill Drive, Suite 100, San Bruno, CA 64066. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 200738-0) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 102856)

Laboratory certifications are presented in Appendix B.

3.0 ASBESTOS INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT

This survey was conducted to determine whether asbestos is present in window caulk and roofing materials on the exterior of the building, in preparation for building renovation and restoration. The sampler’s discretion was used for determining the number of samples to be taken of suspect ACM in each HA. The areas inspected for ACM included the exterior (windows and roof) of each of the six building sections of Building 52.

The inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Suspect materials examined and quantified during the inspection included:

Window Caulk, Red Paint Window Caulk, Black Roof Shingle Roofing Felt, Black Roof Caulk, White Roof Caulk, Black Old Roofing Material – remnants of previous rolled roofing prior to installation of EPDM roof (Area F only)

A total of 28 bulk samples were collected from Building 52. Figures showing bulk sample locations are located in Appendix C.

4.0 INSPECTION RESULTS

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following materials contain greater than 1% asbestos and are considered ACM. The following table presents the location of ACM materials identified during the survey.

Location ACM Material Window above basement level door near southwest corner of Area A (Sample A2)

Non-friable Gray Caulk with Red Paint

3rd floor window in Area B (Sample B4) Non-friable Gray Caulk with Red Paint Basement level window in Area F (Sample F2) Non-friable Black Caulk with Red Paint Basement level window in Area F (Sample F3) Non-friable Tan Caulk with Red Paint Roof Ledge of Area F (Sample F6) Non-friable Gray/Black Roofing Felt Roof Ledge of Area F (Sample F7) Non-friable Black Roofing Felt

APPENDIX A

TEHAMA PERSONNEL CERTIFICATIONS

APPENDIX B:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATIONS

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC 3141 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 777, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA main +1 703-846-0736 fax +1 703-207-8558 Twitter: @AIHA_LAP_LLC

R2 04/26/2013

August 29, 2014

Laboratory ID: 102856

Tim Costello EMLab P&K, LLC.

1150 Bayhill Dr.

Suite 100 San Bruno, CA 94066

Dear Mr. Costello:

Congratulations! The AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC’s Analytical Accreditation Board (AAB) has approved EMLab P&K, LLC. as an accredited Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Microbiology laboratory.

Accreditation documentation includes the IHLAP and EMLAP accreditation certificate, scope of accreditation document and a copy of the current AIHA-LAP, LLC license agreement (if your completed agreement is not on file at AIHA-LAP, LLC). The accreditation logo has been designed for use by all AIHA-LAP, LLC accredited laboratories. If your laboratory chooses to use the logo in its advertising the laboratory’s accreditation, you must complete and return the AIHA-LAP, LLC license agreement to a Laboratory Accreditation Specialist. Once submitted, an electronic copy of the accreditation logo will be sent to you. Please inform us if your laboratory does not wish to use the logo in advertising.

Laboratory accreditation shall be maintained by continued compliance with IHLAP and EMLAP requirements (see Policy Modules 2B, 2D and 6), which includes proficient participation in AIHA-LAP, LLC approved proficiency testing, demonstration of competency, or round robin program as indicated on the AIHA-LAP “Approved PT and Round Robin” webpage, its associated PT-Scope table, and as required in Policy Module 6, for all Fields of Testing (FoTs) for which the laboratory is accredited. An accredited laboratory that wishes to expand into a new FoT must submit an updated accreditation application to AIHA-LAP, LLC for review by the AAB.

Any changes in ownership, laboratory location, personnel, FoTs/Methods, or significant procedural changes shall be reported to AIHA-LAP, LLC in writing within twenty (20) business days of the change.

The accreditation certificate is the property of AIHA-LAP, LLC and must be returned to us should your laboratory withdraw or be removed from the Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Microbiology.

Again, congratulations. If you have any questions, please contact Lauren Maher, Laboratory Accreditation Specialist, at (703) 846-0716.

Sincerely, Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director

A L ab or at or y A cc re di ta tio n

Pr og ra m s, LL

C ac kn ow le dg es th at

E M

L ab

K , L

L C

B ay hi ll D r., S ui te

, S an

B ru no , C

La bo ra to ry

: 1 al on g w ith a ll pr em is es fr om w hi ch k ey a ct iv iti es a re p er fo rm ed

, a s lis te d ab ov e, h as fu lfi lle d th e re qu ire m en ts o f t he A

L ab or at or y

A cc re di ta tio n Pr og ra m s

A -L

A P)

, L

a cc re di ta tio n to th e

/IE

:2 in te rn at io na l s ta nd ar d, G en er al R eq ui re m en ts fo r th e

C om pe te nc e of T es tin g an d C al ib ra tio n La bo ra to ri es in th e fo llo w in g: L A

B O

R A

T O

R Y

A C

C R

E D

N P

R O

G R

A M

D U

H Y

N E

A cc re di ta tio n Ex pi re s:

N V

N M

E N

T A

L L

E A

D A cc re di ta tio n

Ex pi re s:

N V

N M

E N

T A

L M

O B

O G

Y A cc re di ta tio n

Ex pi re s:

D A cc re di ta tio n

Ex pi

U E

S C

S A cc re di ta tio n

Ex pi

Sp ec ifi c

Fi el d( s) o f

Te st in g

(F oT

)/M et ho d(

s) w ith in e ac h A cc re di ta tio n

Pr og ra m fo r w hi ch t he a bo ve n am ed l ab or at or y m ai nt ai ns a cc re di ta tio n is ou tli ne d on t he a tta ch ed

S co pe o f A cc re di ta tio n.

C on tin ue d ac cr ed ita tio n is c on tin ge nt u po n su cc es sf ul o n-go in g co m pl ia nc e w ith I

/IE

a nd A

-L A

P, L

re qu ire m en ts

Th is c er tif ic at e is n ot v al id w ith ou t t he a tta ch ed S co pe o f A cc re di ta tio n.

P le as e re vi ew th e A

P, L

w eb si te (w w w

.a ih aa cc re di te dl ab s.o rg ) f or th e m os t c ur re nt S co pe

G er al d

Sc hu ltz ,C

C ha ir pe rs on , A na ly tic al

A cc re di ta tio n Bo ar d

C he ry l O

. M or to n

M an ag in g D ir ec to r, AI

A La bo ra to ry

A cc re di ta tio n Pr og ra m s, LL

R ev is io n

:0 3/

D at e Is su ed

:0 8/

Effective: 03/12/2013 102856_Scope_IHLAP_2014_08_29

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMLab P&K, LLC. Laboratory ID: 102856 1150 Bayhill Dr., Suite 100, San Bruno, CA 94066 Issue Date: 08/29/2014

The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation.

Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 07/01/2012

A complete listing of currently accredited Industrial Hygiene laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at: http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org

IHLAP Scope Category

Field of Testing (FoT)

Technology sub-type/ Detector

Published Reference Method/Title of In-house

Method

Method Description or Analyte

(for internal methods only)

Asbestos/Fiber Microscopy Core

Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) SOP 01260

“Sample Preparation and Analysis for Asbestos and Other Fibers by PCM – Air Sample Analysis” Standard

Operating Procedure, Document Number

01260, utilizes NIOSH 7400 A and B rules protocol and OSHA ID- 160 protocol for Time Weighted Averages

102856_Scope_EMLAP_2014_08_29

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMLab P&K, LLC. Laboratory ID: 102856 1150 Bayhill Dr., Suite 100, San Bruno, CA 94066 Issue Date: 08/29/2014

Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 07/01/2012

EMLAP Category Field of Testing (FoT) Method Method Description

(for internal methods only)

Fungal

Air - Culturable 01043 Preparation and Analysis of Air Samples for Culturable Fungi

Bulk - Culturable 02584 Analysis of Dust, Swab, Water and Bulk Samples for Culturable Fungi

Surface - Culturable 02584 Analysis of Dust, Swab, Water and Bulk Samples for Culturable Fungi

Air - Direct Examination 01038

Preparation and Analysis of Spore Trap (Air) Samples for Fungal Spores, Other Biological and Non-Biological Particles

Bulk - Direct Examination

01039

Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust – Soil Samples for

Qualitative Direct Microscopic Examination

01041

Preparation an Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust - Soil Samples for

Quantitative Direct Microscopic Examination

Surface - Direct Examination

01039

Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust – Soil Samples for

Qualitative Direct Microscopic Examination

01041

Preparation an Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust - Soil Samples for

Quantitative Direct Microscopic Examination

Bacterial

Air - Culturable 01051 Enumeration and Gram Stain Identification of Aerobic Bacteria in Air

Bulk - Culturable 01040 Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative

Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis

102856_Scope_EMLAP_2014_08_29

EMLAP Category Field of Testing (FoT) Method Method Description

(for internal methods only)

Bacterial Surface - Culturable 01040

Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative

Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis

Legionella 01687 Detection and enumeration of Legionella bacteria (based on CDC method)

A complete listing of currently accredited Environmental Microbiology laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at: http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org

APPENDIX C:

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE

LOCATION FIGURES

BUILDING 52

HISTORIC WALL INVENTORY PLAN/Summary of Historically-Signi cant Walls 2012 Floor Plans developed by GLMV, used as base plans.

SHERIDAN HALL WAGNER HALL LLAH NAMREHS LLAH TNARG

PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE - ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC

Walls to be retained with minimal intrusion or alterations Historic Stairways

SECONDARY SIGNIFICANCE - NON-ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC MORE THAN

50 YEARS OLD

Walls should be retained where possible but may accommodate minor alterations

NO HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE - POST-1960 CONSTRUCTION

Walls may be removed

NOTE The plan con guration indicated by the historic walls is a signi cant feature.

Historic fabric on interior includes plaster walls, wood trim (baseboards, door and window casings) and paneled wood doors generally located on primary historic walls indicated on plans. Plaster ceilings are extant above existing suspended ceilings in some area. Other signi cant interior features include historic stairways, marble trim, and terrazzo ooring.

KEY

HISTORIC SURVEY UPDATE/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building 52: Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas June 2012 14 llaW roiretxE A noitceS llaW roiretxE B noitceS llaW roiretxE C noitceS llaW roiretxE D noitceS llaW roiretxE E noitceS llaW roiretxE F noitceS noitacoL elpmaS MCA evitisoP

Legend noitacoL elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN

October 2016 sgniwarD noitacoL elplmaS kluB sotsebsA

F1 E4

D2C2

HISTORIC WALL INVENTORY PLAN/Summary of Historically Signi cant Walls 2012 Floor Plans developed by GLMV, used as base plans.

SHERIDAN HALL WAGNER HALL GRANT HALL SHERMAN HALL

Building 52 : First Floor : Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas October 2016

Exterior Wall

Positive for ACM Sample

Non-Detect ACM Sample

Legend

Asbestos Bulk Samlple Location Drawings

Exterior Wall

Positive for ACM Sample

Non-Detect ACM Sample llaW roiretxE A noitceS llaW roiretxE B noitceS llaW roiretxE C noitceS llaW roiretxE D noitceS llaW roiretxE E noitceS llaW roiretxE F noitceS noitacoL elpmaS MCA evitisoP

Legend noitacoL elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN

A1 C1 D1

SHERIDAN HALL WAGNER HALL LLAH NAMREHS LLAH TNARG

October 2016 Building 52: Second Floor: Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas sgniwarD noitacoL elplmaS kluB sotsebsA

Exterior Wall elpmaS MCA rof evitisoP elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN dnegeL

NB 25GNILDIU

Exterior Wall elpmaS MCA rof evitisoP elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN dnegeL llaW roiretxE A noitceS llaW roiretxE B noitceS llaW roiretxE C noitceS llaW roiretxE D noitceS llaW roiretxE E noitceS llaW roiretxE F noitceS noitacoL elpmaS MCA evitisoP

Legend noitacoL elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN

E4E3

HISTORIC WALL INVENTORY PLAN/Summary of Historically-Signi cant Walls 2012 Floor Plans developed by GLMV, used as base plans.

SHERIDAN HALL LLAH NAMREHS LLAH TNARG

PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE - ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC

Walls to be retained with minimal intrusion or alterations Historic Stairways

SECONDARY SIGNIFICANCE - NON-ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC MORE THAN

50 YEARS OLD

Walls should be retained where possible but may accommodate minor alterations

NO HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE - POST-1960 CONSTRUCTION

Walls may be removed

NOTE The plan con guration indicated by the historic walls is a signi cant feature.

KEY

HISTORIC SURVEY UPDATE/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building 52: Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas June 2012 17 October 2016 sgniwarD noitacoL elplmaS kluB sotsebsA

Exterior Wall elpmaS MCA rof evitisoP elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN dnegeL

4B llaW roiretxE A noitceS llaW roiretxE B noitceS llaW roiretxE C noitceS llaW roiretxE D noitceS llaW roiretxE E noitceS llaW roiretxE F noitceS noitacoL elpmaS MCA evitisoP

Legend noitacoL elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN

Building 52 : Third Floor : Grant, Sheridan, and Sherman Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas

October 2016 sgniwarD noitacoL elplmaS kluB sotsebsA Building 52: Fourth Floor: Grant Hall, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas

Legend

Fourth

HISTORIC WALL INVENTORY PLAN/Summary of Historically Signi cant Walls 2012 Floor Plans developed by GLMV, used as base plans.

SHERIDAN HALL WAGNER HALL GRANT HALL SHERMAN HALL

PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE - ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC

Walls to be retained with minimal intrusion or alterations Historic Stairways

SECONDARY SIGNIFICANCE - NON-ORIGINAL HISTORIC FABRIC MORE THAN

50 YEARS OLD

Walls should be retained where possible but may accommodate minor alterations

NO HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE - POST-1960 CONSTRUCTION

Walls may be removed

NOTE The plan con guration indicated by the historic walls is a signi cant feature.

KEY

HISTORIC SURVEY UPDATE/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building 52: Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas June 2012 15

2E & 1E

5C & 4C 7F & 6F

5F & 4F4D & 3D

B1 & B2

A3 & A4

Building 52: Roof : Grant, Sheridan, Sherman, and Wagner Halls, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas October 2016 sgniwarD noitacoL elplmaS kluB sotsebsA

Roof

Exterior Wall elpmaS MCA rof evitisoP elpmaS MCA tceteD-noN dnegeL

N llaW roiretxE A noitceS llaW roiretxE B noitceS llaW roiretxE C noitceS llaW roiretxE D noitceS llaW roiretxE E noitceS llaW roiretxE F noitceS noitacoL elpmaS MCA evitisoP

Legend

APPENDIX D:

CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND LABORATORY RESULTS

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Tracy Garcia

Report for:

Megan Utter Tehama 1600 Genessee, Suite 860 Kansas City, MO 64102

Regarding: Project: F0073; FLW-Building 52

EML ID: 1625284

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM: 11-01-2016

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA Methods 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020, SOP EM-AS-S-1267)

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 1 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

EMLab P&K 6500 McDonough Dr, Suite C-10, Norcross, GA 30093

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Total Samples Submitted: 28 Total Samples Analyzed: 28

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 7

Location: A1, Red window caulk, 2nd floor door, window Lab ID-Version‡: 7557144-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: A2, Red window caulk, 1st floor door, window Lab ID-Version‡: 7557145-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Caulk with Red Paint 2% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: A3, Shingle, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557146-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Shingle with White Pebbles ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: A4, Roofing felt, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557147-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 70% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 2 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: B1, Shingle, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557148-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Shingle with White Pebbles ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: B2, Roofing felt, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557149-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 70% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: B3, Red window caulk, 3rd floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557150-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: B4, Red window caulk, 3rd floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557151-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Caulk with Red Paint 5% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 3 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: C1, Red window caulk, 2nd floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557152-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: C2, Red window caulk, 1st floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557153-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Cream Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: C3, Red window caulk, 5th floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557154-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Caulk ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: C4, Shingle, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557155-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Shingle with White Pebbles ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 4 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: C5, Roofing felt, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557156-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 70% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: D1, Red window caulk, 2nd floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557157-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Caulk with Red Paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 2% Talc Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: D2, Red window caulk, 1st floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557158-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Light Gray Caulk ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: D3, Roofing felt, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557159-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 70% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 5 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: D4, Shingle, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557160-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Shingle with Pebbles ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: E1, Shingle, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557161-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar ND

Black Roofing Shingle with White Pebbles ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers

< 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: E2, Roofing felt, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557162-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 55% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: E3, Red window caulk, 3rd floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557163-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 6 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: F1, Black window caulk, 1st floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557164-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Caulk 7% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Location: F2, Red window caulk, 1st floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557165-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Caulk with Red Paint 5% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: F3, Red window caulk, 2nd floor door, window Lab ID-Version‡: 7557166-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Caulk with Red Paint 7% Chrysotile

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: F4, White roof caulk, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557167-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Caulk ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 7 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: Tehama C/O: Megan Utter Re: F0073; FLW-Building 52

Date of Submittal: 10-26-2016 Date of Receipt: 10-28-2016 Date of Report: 11-01-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: F5, Black roof caulk, roof Lab ID-Version‡: 7557168-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Caulk ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: F6, Old roofing, roof, ledge Lab ID-Version‡: 7557169-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray/Black Roofing Felt 25% Chrysotile

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 30% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: F7, Old roofing, roof, ledge Lab ID-Version‡: 7557170-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Felt 45% Chrysotile

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 30% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: E4, Red window caulk, 1st floor Lab ID-Version‡: 7557171-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Caulk with Red Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1625284, Page 8 of 8EMLab P&K, LLC

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

APPENDIX E:

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Sa m pl e

A 2:

D es cr ip tio n:

G ra y C au lk w ith

R ed

P ai nt , 1 st Fl oo r, D oo r, W in do w , S ec tio n A

, B ui ld in g

D at e/ T im e:

O ct ob er

5, :2

Ph ot o ta ke n by : J er re tt D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in g pl e

B 4:

D es cr ip tio n:

G ra y C au lk w ith

R ed

P ai nt , 3 rd Fl oo r, W in do w

, S ec tio n

B , B ui ld in g

D at e/

T im e:

O ct ob er

5, :3

Ph ot o ta ke n by

: J er re tt

D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in pl e

D es cr ip tio n:

B la ck C au lk

, 1 st

Fl oo r, W in do w , S ec tio n F, B ui ld in g

D at e/ T im e:

O ct ob er

5, 9:

Ph ot o ta ke n by

: J er re tt

D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in pl e

D es cr ip tio n:

T an

C au lk w ith R ed P ai nt

, 1 st

Fl oo r, W in do w , S ec tio n F, B ui ld in g

D at e/ T im e:

O ct ob er

Ph ot o ta ke n by : J er re tt D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in pl e

D es cr ip tio n:

G ra y C au lk w ith

R ed

P ai nt , 2 nd Fl oo r, D oo r, W in do w , S ec tio n F, B ui ld in g

D at e/ T im e:

O ct ob er

5, :0

Ph ot o ta ke n by : J er re tt D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in pl es

D es cr ip tio n:

G ra y/

B la ck R oo fin g Fe lt an d B la ck

R oo fin g

Fe lt, R oo f L ed ge , S ec tio n F, B ui ld in g

D at e/ T im e:

O ct ob er

6, :4

Ph ot o ta ke n by : J er re tt D om lin g

Jo b

N o.

: F

X X

Pr oj ec t:

B ui ld in

Sheets and Views

Sheridan S

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Sep 6, 2024.