B-30755 JPMC Tray Inserts SSJF 220707.pdf

Sole Source Justification Form

Version 7.01 Page 1 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

Sole Source Justification Form - Part I Section I - General Information

Department/Bureau/Section: Bureau of Strategic Sourcing / Equipment and Commodities

Need Identified Date: Jun 1, 2022 Supply/Service Need By Date: Sep 20, 2022

Project Title: JPMC Tray Inserts Approved Brand SEFS

Vendor: Aladdin Temp Rite LLC

Provide a description of the supplies or services required: Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems currently being utilized by residential institutions.

Value: Estimated Value of Initial Term, this Change Order or Amendment: 1,063,872.65

Will this Sole Source amend a Professional or Artistic Services contract? Yes No

*Sole Source may not be used for amendments for Professional or Artistic Services if the amendment would increase the value by more than 5% of the initial award or extend the term by more than 60 days.

Type: New Sole Economically Feasible Source

Section II - Proposed Term

One-Time Purchase Term Contract

Estimated Contract Begin Date: Oct 5, 2022

Estimated Contract End Date: Oct 4, 2023

Number of Potential Renewals: 0

Length of Each Renewal in Months: 0

Total Value of All Renewals: 0

If a Term Contract, does the term, including renewals, exceed 12 months? Yes No

Section III - Funding Source Select the type of funding to be used (Check all that apply): State Appropriate Funds Federal Funds Other (Explain):

Section IV - Sole Source Justification

This purchase is economically only available from a single source primarily because it is: (If "Other" explain in one sentence)

Compatibility of Equipment, Accessories, Replacement Parts or Service

Are there secondary justification(s) for this sole source? Yes No

Version 7.01 Page 2 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

Section V - Purchase History

Has the Agency or University Purchased these supplies or services in the past? Yes No

Term Term From Term To Value Description Contract Number Type

1 Sept 1, 2009 Aug 31, 2010 174,638 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4015864 IFB

2 Sept 10, 2010 Aug 31, 2011 174,638 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4015864 Renewal

3 Sept 11, 2011 Aug 31, 2012 110,476.5 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4017018 IFB

4 July 10, 2013 July 9, 2015 214,877.5 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4017536 IFB

5 July 10, 2015 July 9, 2017 218,360 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4017536 Renewal

6 Jan 19, 2018 Jan 18, 2019 120,000 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

4018495/P-543 Sole Source

7 Jun 11, 2019 Jun 10, 2020 217,591.84 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

P-9315 Sole Source

8 Jun 10, 2020 Sept 10, 2020 54,397.96 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

P-9315 Amendment

9 Sept 10, 2020 Dec 10, 2020 0 Disposable plastic tray inserts and reusable dishware for food delivery systems.

P-9315 Amendment

If more than 10, or if other comments, explain:

Section VI - Business Rationale

1. Provide a detailed explanation of the need for the supplies or services:

Meals are provided via the Aladdin food delivery sanitation systems to accommodate patients/clients who are unable to travel through cafeteria lines. Food may be prepared ahead and stored in refrigerator or kept warm until serving time.

2. Provide a list and describe in detail the specifications required to satisfy the need:

To obtain both disposable and reusable items such as entree dishes, bowls, lids, and various dish sizes to be used in the existing food delivery sanitation systems.

3. Provide detail explaining the justification selected in Section IV to explain why the requested supplies or services are the only ones available that can satisfy the agency or university requirements?

This contract will allow the Agencies to purchase disposable and reusable dishware that fit their existing Aladdin food delivery systems at a constant price.

Version 7.01 Page 3 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

4. What are the unique features of the supplies or services that are not available in any other product or by any other vendor? Provide specific quantifiable factors/qualifications:

The tray inserts are manufactured by Aladdin Temp Rite and are specific to the food sanitation systems currently in use by the State. In addition, for compatibility purposes they are designed to nest and fit within the compartmental sections during transport to our Veterans and our other State clientele population.

5. Has the Agency or University considered alternative supplies or services to satisfy their need? Yes No

5a. If yes, name the alternative vendors whose supplies or services were evaluated:

Most recently the State has solicited 3 IFBs (B-15962, B-18785 and B-21775) and no successful contract was produced; however, prior to that Aladdin Temp Rite has been the only responsive vendor to meet the State's needs.

5b. If yes, what were the alternatives for each vendor and why were they unacceptable? Be specific with regard to features, characteristics, requirements, capabilities and compatibility:

The facilities have the Aladdin delivery food system. The trays used to deliver the food must have the correct fitting tray inserts used with them or the lids will not fit tightly, causing spillage of the food during transport.

Other food containers have been ordered and used from small vendors, but have not fit correctly issues have occurred. As a result of these issues, new food trays had to be prepared and to be hand delivered to the unit by Dietary staff.

5c. Explain how the market evaluation was conducted?

*This evaluation is to determine available options within a market. If the evaluation is to determine quality or best suited option, this is not the appropriate source selection. Under no circumstances shall the evaluation consist of testing alternative options. These activities must be conducted in a competitive transparent environment (i.e. IFB or RFP).

Historically, IFBs have been issued by the State in order to evaluate the market for these products. Upon review of the US Bureau of Labor Producer Price Index prior to award or renewal we identify any changes in the market in conjunction with prices received to determine if prices are fair and reasonable. In addition, a comparative analysis is conducted with the previous contract prices vs the new pricing to determine if pricing is In the best interest of the State.

6. Are there resellers or distributors?

Yes No N/A

7. What efforts were made to get the best possible price (i.e. did the agency/university negotiate) and how did you determine the price for this purchase is considered fair and reasonable?

A price comparison was conducted between the previous contract prices versus the new proposed pricing which resulted in an overall 67% average increase. In addition, a review of the Producer Price Index (PPI) (WPU072B) disclosed 38% increase which was 138.2 in June 2019 (when last contract prices were established) to 190.082 in May 2022 (the most recent posting when this pricing was received). So PPl shows a market increase of 38% while Aladdin Temp-Rite's proposed pricing has gone up on average 67% higher due to a number of variables. The impact of Covid-19 resulting in higher materials cost to make the products as well as shipping costs. Aladdin Temp- Rite's proposed pricing is 29% above what PPI justifies; however, it does not supersede the State's need to have these products available for the State's clientele population during these unprecedented times.

8. Will this purchase obligate the State to this vendor for future purchases such as maintenance, licensing or continuing need?

Yes No

8a. If yes, please provide details regarding future obligations and/or needs:

This is a continuing need due to fact that the existing Aladdin food delivery systems are already in use by the State.

9. What will be the financial or other impact to the State if this sole source is not approved and a competitive bid is required?

The State will be forced to make multiple small purchases at higher costs until a new contract is established.

Version 7.01 Page 4 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

10. Is there any additional information you would like to add to justify this sole source?

Yes, in addition for the following reasons the cost has significantly increased this time versus the last contract established in 6/2019:

1. Increased quantity case count changes on lines 1and 2 (1000/cs to 2000/cs) with a higher price of $133.65 and $170.65 Lines 3 (2000/ cs to 4000/cs) with a higher cost of $145.60. Line 4 (4000/cs to 6000/cs) with a higher cost of 165.40.

2. DVA has opened a new Veterans home in Chicago which resulted in increased estimated quantities in order to service our veterans at the facility.

3. The new mugs offered are $101.28 packaged at 48/cs versus the previous contract price of $78.24 (now obsolete) for the same case.

size.

Version 7.01 Page 5 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

Section VII

Requesting Department Representative

Requesting Department Signature Required

I know and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and attest that all statements are true and correct and the fairness and reasonableness of the price was adequately confirmed.

Date Jul 1, 2022

Printed Name Linda Tribbet E-mail Address Linda.Tribbet@Illinois.gov

Phone Number 217-557-4306

State Agency Bureau/Division Head or University Purchasing Director Approval and Signature Required

I know and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and attest that all statements are true and correct and the fairness and reasonableness of the price was adequately confirmed. (All prior form fields will lock once this e-signature is completed)

E-mail Address will.stephens2@illinois.gov

Phone Number 217-782-4561 Date Jul 7, 2022

Printed Name Will Stephens

Agency Bureau/Division Head or University Purchasing Director and Not a Designee

SPO Approval and Signature Required

I have reviewed and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and agree with the State Agency or University determination.

I have reviewed and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and do not agree with the State Agency or University determination. As a result, the State Agency or University must explore other sourcing methods to satisfy their need.

State Purchasing Officer Signature Phone Number Date

Printed Name E-mail Address

Version 7.01 Page 6 of 6

Bulletin Reference Number 22-416CMS-BOSS4-R-124661 / B-30755

Requesting Agency/University Central Management Services

Sole Source Justification Form - Part II Section I - General Information

Project Title

Vendor

Initial Date of Procurement Bulletin Posting

Was a Sole Source hearing held per 30 ILCS 500/20-25?

Yes - Complete Section II and III below (Section II will only be visible when this option is selected)

No - Section II not required, go to Section III below Section III - CPO Approval and Signature Required

Based on my review, I authorize the Agency/University to proceed in accordance with the published Notice referenced above.

Based upon my review, I authorize the Agency/University to proceed with the following Changes.

Based on my review, the Agency/University is not authorized to proceed with this sole source as presented and my recommendation is that it be cancelled.

Other

CPO Signature CPO Phone

Printed Name Date

CPO E-mail

Version 7.01 Page of Sole Source Justification Form - Part I Section I - General Information Will this Sole Source amend a Professional or Artistic Services contract?

If yes, what was the original contract value?

*Sole Source may not be used for amendments for Professional or Artistic Services if the amendment would increase the value by more than 5% of the initial award or extend the term by more than 60 days.

Section II - Proposed Term If a Term Contract, does the term, including renewals, exceed 12 months?

If yes, provide a detailed justification including any economic benefit received for agreeing to a multi-year term:

Section III - Funding Source Select the type of funding to be used (Check all that apply):

Section IV - Sole Source Justification Are there secondary justification(s) for this sole source?

Section V - Purchase History Has the Agency or University Purchased these supplies or services in the past?

Term Term From Term To Value Description Contract Number Type Section VI - Business Rationale

1. Provide a detailed explanation of the need for the supplies or services:

2. Provide a list and describe in detail the specifications required to satisfy the need:

3. Provide detail explaining the justification selected in Section IV to explain why the requested supplies or services are the only ones available that can satisfy the agency or university requirements?

4. What are the unique features of the supplies or services that are not available in any other product or by any other vendor? Provide specific quantifiable factors/qualifications:

5. Has the Agency or University considered alternative supplies or services to satisfy their need?

5a. If yes, name the alternative vendors whose supplies or services were evaluated:

5b. If yes, what were the alternatives for each vendor and why were they unacceptable? Be specific with regard to features, characteristics, requirements, capabilities and compatibility:

5c. Explain how the market evaluation was conducted?

*This evaluation is to determine available options within a market. If the evaluation is to determine quality or best suited option, this is not the appropriate source selection. Under no circumstances shall the evaluation consist of testing alternative options. These activities must be conducted in a competitive transparent environment (i.e. IFB or RFP).

5a. If no, why weren't alternatives evaluated?

6. Are there resellers or distributors?

7. What efforts were made to get the best possible price (i.e. did the agency/university negotiate) and how did you determine the price for this purchase is considered fair and reasonable?

8. Will this purchase obligate the State to this vendor for future purchases such as maintenance, licensing or continuing need?

8a. If yes, please provide details regarding future obligations and/or needs:

9. What will be the financial or other impact to the State if this sole source is not approved and a competitive bid is required?

10. Is there any additional information you would like to add to justify this sole source?

Section VII Requesting Department Signature Required I know and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and attest that all statements are true and correct and the fairness and reasonableness of the price was adequately confirmed.

State Agency Bureau/Division Head or University Purchasing Director Approval and Signature Required I know and understand the contents of this Sole Source Justification and attest that all statements are true and correct and the fairness and reasonableness of the price was adequately confirmed. (All prior form fields will lock once this e-signature is completed) SPO Approval and Signature Required Sole Source Justification Form - Part II Section I - General Information Was a Sole Source hearing held per 30 ILCS 500/20-25?

Section II - Sole Source Hearing Details The State posted to the Illinois Procurement Bulletin a description of the State's need, the justification for the sole source decision, and information regarding the opportunity to submit comments and testify at a public hearing. Notice of the hearing was also posted outside of the hearing room 48 hours prior to the hearing.

The public hearing was conducted for the purpose of receiving testimony regarding the sole source determination. The Hearing Officer recommends the following:

The following relevant documents are attached:

Section III - CPO Approval and Signature Required 9.0.0.2.20101008.1.734229

Other food containers have been ordered and used from small vendors, but have not fit correctly issues have occurred. As a result of these issues, new food trays had to be prepared and to be hand delivered to the unit by Dietary staff.

1. Increased quantity case count changes on lines 1and 2 (1000/cs to 2000/cs) with a higher price of $133.65 and $170.65 Lines 3 (2000/cs to 4000/cs) with a higher cost of $145.60. Line 4 (4000/cs to 6000/cs) with a higher cost of 165.40.

2. DVA has opened a new Veterans home in Chicago which resulted in increased estimated quantities in order to service our veterans at the facility.

3. The new mugs offered are $101.28 packaged at 48/cs versus the previous contract price of $78.24 (now obsolete) for the same case. size.