Award Information
106 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CM At Risk for Greene County Primary School
- Solicitation number
- 66610-2023-RFQ-GCSS-PRIMARY
- Issued by
- Greene County, Georgia
About this file
This is an Award Information document detailing evaluation scores for the Greene County School System's (GCSS) Request for Proposal (RFP) P100 for Construction Manager At-Risk services for Greene County Primary School in Georgia. The GCSS solicited proposals from general contractors for construction management at-risk delivery services, with a mandatory pre-proposal conference held on November 11, 2021, at 2:00 PM ET in Greensboro, Georgia. The proposal submission deadline was December 7, 2021, at 3:00 PM ET. The evaluation process assessed proposals across four primary categories: Firm Overview (25 points), Financial Information (50 points), Project Approach (150 points), and Project Experience (150 points), with an additional 125 points allocated for cost considerations, for a total possible score of 500 points. Proposals were required to achieve a minimum noncost score of 262.5 points (70% of 375 possible noncost points) to qualify for the competitive range.
The evaluation document presents scoring results for multiple bidders across two separate evaluation rounds. In the first round, Evergreen Construction achieved the highest score of 497 points (372 noncost, 125 cost), while Meja Construction scored 343.54 (303 noncost, 40.54 cost) and did not meet the competitive range threshold. The second round evaluated RW Allen Construction (352.41 total), McKnight Construction (386.67 total), and Parrish Construction Group (405.33 total), with RW Allen Construction failing to meet the minimum noncost requirement of 262.5 points. Common evaluation concerns across proposals included limited CM@Risk experience, inadequate bonding capacity, insufficient K-12 project experience, incomplete team documentation, and failure to adequately address milestone dates in construction approach sections. Cost scoring utilized the formula {(Lowest Price/Current Price) × 125 Points}.
Text of this file
POSSIBLE
POINTS PTS REEVES YOUNG PTS AJAX BUILDING CORPORATION PTS MEJA CONSTRUCTION PTS EVERGREEN CONSTRUCTION
1 Firm Overview 25 25 25 25 25
Special T&C Section 5.2.2 ‐ Location of Firm 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.3 ‐ Firm Profile 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.4 ‐ Firm Size & Resources, Number of permanent employees by professional discipline 10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.4 ‐ Firm Size & Resources, Organizational Chart 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
2 Financial lnfomation 50 48 50 48 50
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Work Value
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Bonding Capacity
10 8
(‐2) Committee has concerns that bonding capacity appears low.
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Value of Bonded Work
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Percentage of Work During Past 5 years CMR, RFP, Bid, other.
10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
(‐2) Committee has concerns that CM@Risk exsperince is limited.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.2 ‐ Bonding Company Rating/Confirmation
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.2 ‐ Past (3) Fiscal Years of Audited Financial Statements
15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
RFP P100, Construction Manager (CM) at Risk for Greene County Primary School Non‐Cost Evaluation Detail
POINTS PTS RW ALLEN CONSTRUCTION PTS MCKNIGHT CONSTRUCTION PTS
PARRISH CONSTRUCTION
GROUP PTS
1 Firm Overview 25 25 25 25
Special T&C Section 5.2.2 ‐ Location of Firm 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.3 ‐ Firm Profile 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.4 ‐ Firm Size & Resources, Number of permanent employees by professional discipline 10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.2.4 ‐ Firm Size & Resources, Organizational Chart 5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
2 Financial lnfomation 50 48 36 42
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Work Value
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Bonding Capacity
10 10
Complete and detailed
(‐2) Committee has concerns that bonding capacity appears low.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Current Value of Bonded Work
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.1 ‐ Percentage of Work During Past 5 years CMR, RFP, Bid, other. 10 8
(‐2) Committee has concerns that CM@Risk exsperince is limited.
(‐2) Committee has concerns that CM@Risk exsperince is limited.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.1.2 ‐ Bonding Company Rating/Confirmation
5 5
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.3.2 ‐ Past (3) Fiscal Years of Audited Financial Statements 15 15
Complete and detailed
(‐10) Committee has concerns over Current Assets; "Cash and Cash Equivalents". 7
(‐8) Missing Audited Financial Statements for Years 2018 & 2019.
POINTS PTS REEVES YOUNG PTS AJAX BUILDING CORPORATION PTS MEJA CONSTRUCTION PTS
EVERGREEN
CONSTRUCTION
3 Project Approach 150 125 135 135 150
Special T&C Section 5.4.1.1 ‐ Proposed Team Information
30 20
(‐5) Team has limited experience working together. (‐5) Committee has concerns that team's new K12 exsperience is limited. 25
(‐5) No percentage availability listed for team members.
(‐5) Entire project team resumes were not listed. (‐
5) Project Superintendent resume not listed.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.1.2 ‐ Proposed Team Leader Information
35 25
(‐5) Project Executive has less new K12 experience than the committee would like to see.
(‐5%) Project Executive has limited exsperience working with proposed team. 30
(‐5) Operations Manager/Team Leader has less new K12 experience than the committee would like to see.
(‐5) Committee would like to have more information on Project Director's qualifications and ability to achieve customer satisfaction.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.2.1 ‐ Approach to Preconstruction Services
15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.2.2 ‐ Value Engineering
15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.3 ‐ Approach to Construction Services
30 25
(‐5) Committee has concerns that the milestone dates presented in RFP were not considered.
(‐5) Committee has concerns that the milestone dates presented in RFP were not considered.
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.4 ‐ Technical Expertise 15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.5 ‐ Subcontractor Default Management
10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
PARRISH CONSTRUCTION
GROUP PTS
3 Project Approach 150 135 145 150
Special T&C Section 5.4.1.1 ‐ Proposed Team Information
30 25
(‐5) Team has limited experience working together.
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.1.2 ‐ Proposed Team Leader Information
35 25
(‐5) Senor Project Manager has less new K12 experience than the committee would like to see.
(‐5%) Senior Project Manager has limited exsperience working with proposed team.
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.2.1 ‐ Approach to Preconstruction Services
15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.2.2 ‐ Value Engineering 15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.3 ‐ Approach to Construction Services
30 30
Complete and detailed
(‐5) Committee has concerns that the milestone dates presented in RFP were not considered.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.4 ‐ Technical Expertise 15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.4.5 ‐ Subcontractor Default Management
10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
POINTS PTS REEVES YOUNG PTS AJAX BUILDING CORPORATION PTS MEJA CONSTRUCTION PTS
EVERGREEN
CONSTRUCTION
4 Project Experience 150 115 140 95 147
Special T&C Section 5.5.1 ‐ Current & Past Educational Projects (K12/Higher Ed) (At least 3 delivered via CMaR within 30% of scope/value of this project) 60 40
(‐20) Committee has concerns that the three presented projects are not similar scope and nature.
Complete and detailed
(‐5) Two of the three schools presented are not CM@Risk delivery.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.2 ‐ References (3 within 30% of scope/value of this project)
30 20
(‐10) Committee has concerns that the references are not for similar scope and nature projects. 30
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.3 ‐ Unusual Project Constraints 35 35
Complete and detailed
(‐10) No specfic unusal previous project constraints listed.
(‐35) No Unusual Project Constraits listed.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.4 ‐ Litigation 15 15
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
(‐15) No Litigation or statement listed.
(‐3) Litigation in last five (5) years.
Special T&C Section 5.5.5 ‐ OSHA EMR for past
(3) years 10 5
(‐5) Committee has concerns in regard to the Experience Modification Rate increasing. 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Non‐Cost Subtotal 375 313 350 303 372
Cost 125 66.58 71.88 40.54 125
Total 500 379.58 421.88 343.54 497
RFP P100, Construction Manager (CM) at Risk for Greene County Primary School Non‐Cost Evaluation Detail
The non‐cost portion of proposals (total of items 1‐4) can receive a mamimum of 375 points. Only non‐cost proposals that receive 262.5 points (70% of total non‐cost score) or more will make it to the competitive range.
Cost Evaluation Formula:
{(Lowest Price/Current Price) x Points Possible} = Score
PARRISH
CONSTRUCTION
GROUP PTS
4 Project Experience 150 95 147 150
Special T&C Section 5.5.1 ‐ Current & Past Educational Projects (K12/Higher Ed) (At least 3 delivered via CMaR within 30% of scope/value of this project)
60 30
(‐20) Two of the three schools presented were not completed in the last five (5) years.
(‐10) Past Project List GMP's do not match highlighted projects and cannot determine CM@Risk delivery. 60
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.2 ‐ References (3 within 30% of scope/value of this project) 30 10
(‐20) Two of the three schools presented were not completed in the last five (5) years. 30
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.3 ‐ Unusual Project Constraints 35 30
(‐5) Rain events are not particularly "Unusual Project Constraints". 35
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.4 ‐ Litigation 15 15
Complete and detailed
(‐3) Litigation in last five (5) yearrs.
Complete and detailed
Special T&C Section 5.5.5 ‐ OSHA EMR for past
(3) years 10 10
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Complete and detailed
Non‐Cost Subtotal 375 303 353 367
Cost 125 49.41 33.67 38.33
Total 500 352.41 386.67 405.33
RFP P100, Construction Manager (CM) at Risk for Greene County Primary School Non‐Cost Evaluation Detail
The non‐cost portion of proposals (total of items 1‐4) can receive a mamimum of 375 points.
Only non‐cost proposals that receive 262.5 points (70% of total non‐cost score) or more will make it to the competitive range.
POINTS PTS REEVES YOUNG PTS
AJAX BUILDING
CORPORATION PTS MEJA CONSTRUCTION PTS
EVERGREEN
CONSTRUCTION
Item #
1 Firm Overview, Spec T&CSection 5.2 25 25 25 25 25
2 Financial Information, Spec T&C Section 5.3 50 48 50 48 50
3 Project Approach, Spec T&C Section 5.4 150 125 135 135 150
4 Project Experience, Spec T&C Section 5.5 150 115 140 95 147
Non‐Cost Subtotal 375 313 350 303 372
5 Cost 125 66.58 71.88 40.54 125
TOTAL 379.58 421.88 343.54 497
* DID NOT MEET COMPETITIVE RANGE
RFP P100, Construction Manager (CM) at Risk for Greene County Primary School Evaluation Scores
The non‐cost portion of proposals (total of items 1‐4) can receive a mamimum of 375 points. Only non‐cost proposals that receive 262.5 points (70% of total non‐cost score) or more will make it to the competitive range.
POINTS PTS
RW ALLEN
CONSTRUCTION PTS
MCKNIGHT
CONSTRUCTION PTS
PARRISH
CONSTRUCTION
GROUP PTS
Item #
1 Firm Overview, Spec T&CSection 5.2 25 25 25 25
2 Financial Information, Spec T&C Section 5.3 50 48 36 42
3 Project Approach, Spec T&C Section 5.4 150 135 145 150
4 Project Experience, Spec T&C Section 5.5 150 95 147 150
Non‐Cost Subtotal 375 303 353 367
5 Cost 125 49.41 33.67 38.33
TOTAL 352.41 386.67 405.33
* DID NOT MEET COMPETITIVE RANGE
RFP P100, Construction Manager (CM) at Risk for Greene County Primary School Evaluation Scores
The non‐cost portion of proposals (total of items 1‐4) can receive a mamimum of 375 points. Only non‐cost proposals that receive 262.5 points (70% of total non‐cost score) or more will make it to the competitive range.
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| GCSS RFP New Primary rev 11-03 | — | |
| GCSS-Pre-bid meeting minutes | — |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .