SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA generator repair.doc

SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA

1. This is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15. The Government will select the best overall offeror, based upon an integrated assessment of technical capability, past performance, and price. Technical capability is more important than past performance. Technical capability and price are both more important than past performance.

2. Technical capability will be assessed on these eight factors. All factors are equal in importance:

a. The contractor shall provide depot level maintenance support.

b. The contractor shall furnish all depot level labor, facilities and parts required to inspect, test and repair the parts.

c. All repair actions shall be in accordance with the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) engineering drawings and guidelines.

d. A “Report of Receipts, Inventory, Adjustments, and Shipments of Government Property” DI-MGMT-80442 shall be prepared by the contractor.

e. A “Quality Assessment Report/Tear-Down & Inspection Report” DI QCIC 81187 will be completed before the repair of the parts.

f. Testing shall be done in accordance to the repair procedures specified in paragraph 2.e. above

g. Packaging for return shipment will be best commercial practice.

h. Item Unique Identification (IUID) marking will be in accordance with best practices and government guidelines.

3. These color/adjectival ratings were used to rate the technical area:

4. Past performance will be evaluated to measure the degree to which each offeror satisfied its customers. The evaluation will assess the relevancy and the risk associated with performing the current effort based upon each offeror’s prior performance. Currency, relevancy, and trends of the information will be assessed. Relevancy is a key variable in the integrated assessment. The Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) will be queried as part of the past performance evaluation. Confidence ratings were assigned based upon the following sub factors, all of which are equal in importance:

a. Quality of performance

b. Management effectiveness

c. Customer satisfaction

d. Timeliness.

5. Confidence ratings consist of:

Based on the offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror's performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a) (2)(iii) and (iv)).

6. Price will be evaluated based on the two factors set by the approved source selection plan and the RFP. Any proposals deemed technically acceptable will be judged on complete and accurate pricing. The evaluation factors is:

a. Total estimated contract price based upon the Government’s best estimate of the mix of labor categories, prices and quantities required over the life of the contract. This estimate includes labor costs, travel G&A, other direct costs (ODCs) and overseas premium pay.