Attch 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JBMDL Base Telecommunications Systems Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA448421R0004
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch 12 - DBA NJ20200001 Burlington - Ocean County NJ.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers BTS FA448421R0004.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan 1.doc | DOC document | |
| Attch 5 - Labor Worksheet 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA448421R00040001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 - List of Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 5 - Labor Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 6 - Fillable Pricing Table.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attch 8 - Anti-Terrorism Guide.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA448421R0004.pdf | ||
| Attch 10 - WD Burlington County 2015-4191 Rev 12 dated 21 April 2020.pdf | ||
| Attch 11 - WD Ocean County 2015-4195 Rev 12 dated 21 April 2020.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Attch 9 - EIPS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 1 - Performance Work Statement 26 Jun 20.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 7 - Security Forces Appendix.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Base Telecommunication System Service
Attachment 2 Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
The 87th Contracting Squadron is in the process of competitively selecting a contractor to perform Base Telecommunication System Services at Joint Base McGuire Dix Lakehurst, New Jersey 08641.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than [insert number of days].
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to richard.driscoll.2@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records. Please keep in mind that questionnaires must be sent by the organization completing the questionnaire. No questionnaires will be accepted by the potential offeror.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
| _________________________ | MELODY CIULO |
| CONTRACTING OFFICER |
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
| Name of Respondent: | Title: | |
| Address: | Telephone Number: | |
| Fax Number: | Email Address: |
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: richard.driscoll.2@us.af.mil.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Indicate Not Applicable (N/A) as necessary.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.
| O |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Outstanding |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 12. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 13. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 14. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 15. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 16. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 17. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 18. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 19. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO/NA |
Remarks:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .