Attachments 1 to 3.pdf

PDF 339 KB Posted

Attached to
New IDIQ for R&D Professional Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912HZ23R0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center

About this file

This document contains four attachments related to a federal solicitation for research and development professional services. The solicitation seeks proposals for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract to provide tasks including physical and scaled modeling, computer-aided design, hydrodynamic and hydrologic modeling, planning-based modeling, web-based numerical modeling, in situ data collection and field support, training on numerical models and data collection, ship simulation, predictive systems and machine learning, program management support and technology transfer, data fusion, and wildfire-relevant technologies and support. The solicitation was posted on December 13th, 2022, with the Professional Support Services IDIQ to be awarded by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center. Attachment 1 includes a proposal adequacy checklist, Attachment 2 details a past performance questionnaire form, Attachment 3 provides a sample letter of commitment for key personnel, and Attachment 4 lists task hours and labor rates.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to New IDIQ for R&D Professional Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Bidder Inquiries - As of 11-Jan-2023.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Cross Reference Table Template.docx DOCX document
Bidder Inquiries - As of 10-Jan-2023.pdf PDF
Am-0003-W912HZ23R0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Task Hours and Labor Rates (Section B).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - Task Hours and Labor Rates (Section B).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - USACE Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Am-0002-W912HZ23R0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Proposal Adequacy Checklist.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Key Personnel Letter of Commitment.docx DOCX document
Am-0001-W912HZ23R0001.pdf PDF
W912HZ23R0001 Pro Services.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Task Hours and Labor Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 1 - Proposal Adequacy Checklist

252.215-7009 Proposal Adequacy Checklist.

As prescribed in 215.408(4), use the following provision:

PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST (JAN 2014)

The offeror shall complete the following checklist, providing location of requested information, or an explanation of why the requested information is not provided. In preparation of the offeror’s checklist, offerors may elect to have their prospective subcontractors use the same or similar checklist as appropriate.

PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST

REFERENCES

SUBMISSION

ITEM

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided

EXPLAIN

(may use continuation pages)

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section I

Paragraph A

Is there a properly completed first page of the proposal per

FAR 15.408 Table 15-2 I.A or as specified in the solicitation?

2. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section I

Paragraph A(7)

Does the proposal identify the need for Government-furnished material/tooling/test equipment? Include the accountable contract number and contracting officer contact information if known.

3. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph A(8)

Does the proposal identify and explain notifications of noncompliance with Cost Accounting Standards Board or

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS); any proposal inconsistencies with your disclosed practices or applicable

CAS; and inconsistencies with your established estimating and accounting principles and procedures?

4. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section I, Paragraph C(1)

FAR 2.101, “Cost or pricing data”

Does the proposal disclose any other known activity that could materially impact the costs? This may include, but is not limited to, such factors as— (1) Vendor quotations;

(2) Nonrecurring costs;

(3) Information on changes in production methods and in production or purchasing volume;

(4) Data supporting projections of business prospects and objectives and related operations costs;

(5) Unit-cost trends such as those associated with labor efficiency;

(6) Make-or-buy decisions;

(7) Estimated resources to attain business goals; and

(8) Information on management decisions that could have a significant bearing on costs.

5. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph B

Is an Index of all certified cost or pricing data and information accompanying or identified in the proposal provided and appropriately referenced?

6. FAR 15.403-1(b) Are there any exceptions to submission of certified cost or pricing data pursuant to FAR 15.403-1(b)? If so, is https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/215_4.htm#215.408 supporting documentation included in the proposal? (Note questions 18-20.)

7. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section I

Paragraph C(2)(i)

Does the proposal disclose the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data?

8. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph C(2)(ii)

Does the proposal disclose the nature and amount of any contingencies included in the proposed price?

9. FAR 15.408 Table

15-2, Section II, Paragraph A or B

Does the proposal explain the basis of all cost estimating relationships (labor hours or material) proposed on other than a discrete basis?

10. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraphs D and E

Is there a summary of total cost by element of cost and are the elements of cost cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data? (Breakdowns for each cost element must be consistent with your cost accounting system, including breakdown by year.)

11. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraphs D and E

If more than one Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) or sub Contract Line Item Number (sub-CLIN) is proposed as required by the RFP, are there summary total amounts covering all line items for each element of cost and is it cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data?

12. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

Does the proposal identify any incurred costs for work performed before the submission of the proposal?

13. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph G

Is there a Government forward pricing rate agreement

(FPRA)? If so, the offeror shall identify the official submittal of such rate and factor data. If not, does the proposal include all rates and factors by year that are utilized in the development of the proposal and the basis for those rates and factors?

COST ELEMENTS

MATERIALS AND SERVICES

14. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph A

Does the proposal include a consolidated summary of individual material and services, frequently referred to as a Consolidated Bill of Material (CBOM), to include the basis for pricing? The offeror’s consolidated summary shall include raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, subcontracts and services to be produced or performed by others, identifying as a minimum the item, source, quantity, and price.

SUBCONTRACTS (Purchased materials or services)

15. DFARS 215.404-3 Has the offeror identified in the proposal those subcontractor proposals, for which the contracting officer has initiated or may need to request field pricing analysis?

16. FAR 15.404-3(c)

FAR 52.244-2

Per the thresholds of FAR 15.404-3(c), Subcontract

Pricing Considerations, does the proposal include a copy of the applicable subcontractor’s certified cost or pricing data?

17. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Note 1; Section

II Paragraph A

Is there a price/cost analysis establishing the reasonableness of each of the proposed subcontracts included with the proposal? If the offeror’s price/cost analyses are not provided with the proposal, does the proposal include a matrix identifying dates for receipt of subcontractor proposal, completion of fact finding for purposes of price/cost analysis, and submission of the price/cost analysis?

EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA

18. FAR 52.215-20

FAR 2.101,

“commercial item”

Has the offeror submitted an exception to the submission of certified cost or pricing data for commercial items proposed either at the prime or subcontractor level, in accordance with provision 52.215-20?

a. Has the offeror specifically identified the type of commercial item claim (FAR 2.101 commercial item definition, paragraphs (1) through (8)), and the basis on which the item meets the definition?

b. For modified commercial items (FAR 2.101 commercial item definition paragraph (3)); did the offeror classify the modification(s) as either—

i. A modification of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace (paragraph (3)(i)); or

ii. A minor modification (paragraph (3)(ii)) of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace made to meet Federal Government requirements not exceeding the thresholds in FAR 15.403-1(c)(3)(iii)(B)?

c. For proposed commercial items “of a type”, or

“evolved” or modified (FAR 2.101 commercial item definition paragraphs (1) through (3)), did the contractor provide a technical description of the differences between the proposed item and the comparison item(s)?

19. [Reserved]

20. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph A(1)

Does the proposal support the degree of competition and the basis for establishing the source and reasonableness of price for each subcontract or purchase order priced on a competitive basis exceeding the threshold for certified cost or pricing data?

INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS

21. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph A.(2)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at cost, does the proposal include a complete cost proposal in compliance with Table 15-2?

22. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph A(1)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at price in accordance with FAR 31.205-26(e), does the proposal provide an analysis by the prime that supports the exception from certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1?

DIRECT LABOR

23. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph B

Does the proposal include a time phased (i.e.; monthly, quarterly) breakdown of labor hours, rates and costs by category or skill level? If labor is the allocation base for indirect costs, the labor cost must be summarized in order that the applicable overhead rate can be applied.

24. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph B

For labor Basis of Estimates (BOEs), does the proposal include labor categories, labor hours, and task descriptions, (e.g.; Statement of Work reference, applicable CLIN, Work Breakdown Structure, rationale for estimate, applicable history, and time-phasing)?

25. FAR subpart 22.10 If covered by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute

(41 U.S.C. chapter 67), are the rates in the proposal in compliance with the minimum rates specified in the statute?

INDIRECT COSTS

26. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph C

Does the proposal indicate the basis of estimate for proposed indirect costs and how they are applied?

(Support for the indirect rates could consist of cost breakdowns, trends, and budgetary data.)

OTHER COSTS

27. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II

Paragraph D

Does the proposal include other direct costs and the basis for pricing? If travel is included does the proposal include number of trips, number of people, number of days per trip, locations, and rates (e.g. airfare, per diem, hotel, car rental, etc)?

28. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph E

If royalties exceed $1,500 does the proposal provide the information/data identified by Table 15-2?

29. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

When facilities capital cost of money is proposed, does the proposal include submission of Form CASB-CMF or reference to an FPRA/FPRP and show the calculation of the proposed amount?

FORMATS FOR SUBMISSION OF LINE ITEM SUMMARIES

30. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section III

Are all cost element breakdowns provided using the applicable format prescribed in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2

III? (or alternative format if specified in the request for proposal)

31. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section III

Paragraph B

If the proposal is for a modification or change order, have cost of work deleted (credits) and cost of work added

(debits) been provided in the format described in FAR

15.408, Table 15-2.III.B?

32. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section III

Paragraph C

For price revisions/redeterminations, does the proposal follow the format in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.C?

OTHER

33. FAR 16.4 If an incentive contract type, does the proposal include offeror proposed target cost, target profit or fee, share ratio, and, when applicable, minimum/maximum fee, ceiling price?

34. FAR 16.203-4 and

FAR 15.408 Table

15-2, Section II, Paragraphs A, B, C, and D

If Economic Price Adjustments are being proposed, does the proposal show the rationale and application for the economic price adjustment?

35. FAR 52.232-28 If the offeror is proposing Performance-Based Payments did the offeror comply with FAR 52.232-28?

36. FAR 15.408(n)

FAR 52.215-22

FAR 52.215-23

Excessive Pass-through Charges– Identification of

Subcontract Effort: If the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70% of the total cost of work to be performed, does the proposal identify: (i) the amount of the offeror’s indirect costs and profit applicable to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s); and (ii) a description of the added value provided by the offeror as related to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s)?

(End of provision)

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION WHEN FILLED IN

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

ATTACHMENT 2

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) FORM

1. The USACE Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire.

2. Solicitations:

“Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS

EVALUATION, the PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Past Performance. AN

OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the

Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the

Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow- up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, William Rawe via email at William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”

USACE Form PPQ will be made accessible on as a separate attachment.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_600 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5833 mailto:William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE

OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY

DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE

SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

(including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Attachment 3 – Sample Letter of Commitment for Key Personnel

ATTACHMENT 3

SAMPLE LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________

Dear Sir or Madam: I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that I will fulfill the duty of (Job Title).

Sincerely, (Prospective employee signs)

Date:

Attachment 4 – Task Hours and Labor Rates

ATTACHMENT 4

TASK HOURS AND LABOR RATES

PROVIDED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .