Attachment VI Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Recycle Scrap Metal
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND25QNB190030
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for solicitation #1333ND25QNB190030 for FY25 Recycle Scrap Metal at NIST. The questionnaire must be submitted to Contract Specialist Sandra Smith at sandra.smith@nist.gov by 2:00 PM ET on January 6, 2025, on company letterhead from a corporate email account.
The questionnaire requests information about previous/current contracts including contract number, value, period of performance, and description of items provided. It includes a rating system with five performance levels (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory) to evaluate contractors on overall performance, timeliness, quality of shipments, and ability to resolve problems. The form requires contact information for both the primary respondent and an alternate POC for verification purposes.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 1333ND25QNB190030 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contract Specialist, e-mail Sandra.smith@nist.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the General Services Administration, FAS, Solicitation Number 1333ND25QNB190030 | FY 25 Recycle Scrape Metal. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or fax to Contract Specialist, e-mail snadra.smith@nist.gov
Questionnaire is due to Sandra Smith no later than 2:00 PM ET on 20 January 6, 2025. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist on company letterhead emailed from a corporate email account.
You may be contacted for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________ Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________ II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions – The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Shipments What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of shipping (including packing, marking, etc) and the overall quality of the delivery?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .