Attachment III - Evaluation Criteria.pdf

PDF 199 KB Posted

Attached to
Recycle Scrap Metal
Solicitation number
1333ND25QNB190030
Issued by

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria document for a scrap metal recycling services contract opportunity at NIST's Gaithersburg campus. The document outlines three main technical evaluation factors: Technical Approach and Management (demonstrating understanding of operations, staffing, and management), Quality Assurance Plan (procedures to prevent defective services), and Past Performance (based on similar projects).

The pricing evaluation requires offerors to submit percentage rates that NIST will receive based on current market value for different types of scrap metal (aluminum, stainless steel, light iron, tin, copper, brass, and comingled) after direct/indirect costs are applied. Direct/indirect costs include container rental, hauling fees, labor, and G&A. Offerors must specify their market index source and whether weight is calculated per pound or ton. Technical factors combined are approximately equal to price in the evaluation. The document includes a bid schedule template for offerors to input their proposed costs and percentages. There are no contract options included. Offerors must submit no more than 10 single-sided pages demonstrating their understanding of requirements.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1333ND25QNB190030 | Recycle Scrap Metal Attachment III – Evaluation Criteria

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Recycle Scrap Metal

Contract Award:

The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

CLAUSE 52.212-2 Evaluation -- Commercial Items

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Offeror shall submit no more than ten (10) single sided pages demonstrating their understanding of the requirement which shall include all aspects of the jobs as described in Attachment IV – Statement of Work.

FACTOR A: TECHNICAL – APPROACH AND MANAGEMENT

The offeror shall provide a detailed technical approach to complete the tasks and requirements identified in the attached Statement of Work, and Guidelines for OFPM Contractors. The technical proposal must include information on how the projects sequence of operations is to be organized, staffed, and managed. Information must be provided which will demonstrate the offeror's understanding and management of important events or tasks. The offeror must explain how the management and coordination of consultant and/or subcontractor efforts will be accomplished, if applicable.

FACTOR B: TECHNICAL – QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

The offeror shall submit a quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP). The QASP shall address the areas identified in the scope of work described herein, and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services.

FACTOR C: PAST PERFORMANCE-

The Offer shall provide the past performance questionnaire on projects similar in size and scope to the statement of work. Evaluation of this factor will be based on information contained in the proposal and information provided by references. The Government will evaluate past performance by contacting appropriate references, including NIST references; if applicable. The Government may also consider other information available. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

PRICE

The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to make a price reasonableness determination.

Offerors must submit the following information in their price proposal:

The offeror shall submit the percentage that NIST shall receive based on the verifiable current market value for each type of scrap metal AFTER direct costs and indirect costs have been applied. For comingled scrap metal, a percentage rate shall also be submitted.

PROCEEDS PAID TO NIST =

[(Weight of scrap metal x Current Market Value) – Offeror’s Direct and Indirect Costs] x (percentage received by NIST)

DIRECT & INDIRECT COSTS include: container rental, hauling fee, labor, general & administrative cost (G&A).

Container rental and hauling fee shall be a set fee over the duration of the contract, unless otherwise agreed upon through a modification.

If there are other direct/indirect costs not indicated above that the offeror determines is applicable, the offeror shall list them in the bid schedule. The Government will determine if the costs are allowable prior to award.

The offeror must clearly state if weight is calculated as per pound or per ton rate.

The offeror must indicate which verifiable market index the offeror shall use to determine current market value of the scrap metal. The market index must be publicly accessible by the Government for verification

BID SCHEDULE

Market Index:

Weight Calculated by: Pound or ton

SET COSTS COST

(1) Container Rental

(2) Hauling Fee

SCRAP METAL TYPE Percentage Received by NIST after direct/indirect costs

(1) scrap aluminum

(2) stainless steel

(3) light iron

(4) tin

(5) copper

(6) brass

(7) comingled scrap metal

Additional Direct & Indirect Costs Proposed

* Technical factors, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

*NOTE: There are no options for this contract.

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .