Attachment V - QASP_H9224022Q2032.pdf

H92240-22-Q-2032 Attachment V i

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Naval Special Warfare Basic Plumbing COI

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Performance Management Approach

1.3 Performance Management Strategy

2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1 The Contracting Officer

2.2 The Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative

3 IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY

LEVELS

4 METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE

4.1 Surveillance Techniques

4.2 Customer Feedback

4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels

5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION

5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop

5.2 Monitoring Forms

6 ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT

6.1 Determining Performance

6.2 Reporting

6.3 Reviews and Resolution

ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT 2: SAMPLE QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM

H92240-22-Q-2028

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

(QASP)

1 INTRODUCTION

This quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the performance work statement (PWS) entitled Tactical Driving Techniques Training. This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines Naval Special Warfare Command will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor.

1.1 Purpose

1.1.1 The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards/quality levels identified in the PWS and the contractor’s quality control plan (QCP), and to ensure that the government pays only for the level of services received.

1.1.2 This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities, identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describes quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results.

1.2 Performance Management Approach

1.2.1 The PWS structures the acquisition around “what” service or quality level is required, as opposed to “how” the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance). This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by Naval Special Warfare to monitor and manage the contractor’s performance to ensure the expected outcomes or performance objectives communicated in the PWS are achieved. Performance management rests on developing a capability to review and analyze information generated through performance assessment. The ability to make decisions based on the analysis of performance data is the cornerstone of performance management; this analysis yields information that indicates whether expected outcomes for the project are being achieved by the contractor.

1.2.2 Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional quality assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates away from scrutiny of compliance with the processes and practices used to achieve the outcome. A performance-based approach enables the contractor to play a large role in how the work is performed, as long as the proposed processes are within the stated constraints. The only exceptions to process reviews are those required by law (federal, state, and local) and compelling business situations, such as safety and health. A “results” focus provides the contractor flexibility to continuously improve and innovate over the course of the contract as long as the critical outcomes expected are being achieved and/or the desired performance levels are being met.

1.3 Performance Management Strategy

1.3.1 The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor’s own quality control (QC) program. QC is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this contract regardless of whether the work is performed by contractor employees or by subcontractors. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. The contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated government representative. The contractor’s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. This QASP enables the government to take advantage of the contractor’s QC program.

1.3.2 The government representative(s) will monitor performance and review performance reports furnished by the contractor to determine how the contractor is performing against communicated performance objectives. The government will make determination regarding incentives based on performance measurement metric data and notify the contractor of those decisions. The contractor will be responsible for making required changes in processes and practices to ensure performance is managed effectively.

2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1 The Contracting Officer

The procuring contracting officer (PCO) is responsible for monitoring contract compliance, contract administration, and cost control and for resolving any differences between the observations documented by the contracting officer's representative (COR) when assigned and the contractor. If assigned, the PCO will designate one COR or Technical Representative as the government authority for performance management.

2.2 The Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative– if assigned The COR or TR will be identified by the CO to act as his or her authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. COR/TR limitations are contained in the written appointment. The COR is responsible for technical administration of the project and ensures proper government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR/TR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the government’s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the PCO for action. The COR/TR will have the responsibility for completing QA monitoring forms used to document the inspection and evaluation of the contractor’s work performance.

Government surveillance may occur under the Contract Terms and Conditions clause for any service relating to the contract.

3 IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS/QUALITY

LEVELS

The required performance standards and/or quality levels are included in the PWS and in Attachment 1, “Performance Requirements Summary.” If the contractor meets the required service or performance level, it will be paid the monthly amount agreed on in the contract. Failure to meet the required service or performance level will result in a deduction from the monthly amount.

4 METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE

4.1 Surveillance Techniques

In an effort to minimize the performance management burden, simplified surveillance methods shall be used by the government to evaluate contractor performance when appropriate. The primary methods of surveillance are (include those that apply) Random monitoring, which shall be performed by the PCO, COR or TR.

4.2 Customer Feedback

The contractor is expected to establish and maintain professional communication between its employees and customers. The primary objective of this communication is customer satisfaction.

Customer satisfaction is the most significant external indicator of the success and effectiveness of all services provided and can be measured through customer complaints.

Performance management drives the contractor to be customer focused through initially and internally addressing customer complaints and investigating the issues and/or problems but the customer always has the option to communicate complaints to the PCO, COR or TR, as opposed to the contractor.

Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing the detailed nature of the complaint and must be forwarded to the PCO, COR or TR. The PCO, COR or TR will accept those customer complaints for review and identification of required action.

Customer feedback may also be obtained either from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or from random customer complaints.

4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels

The acceptable quality levels (AQLs) included in Attachment 1, Performance Requirements Summary Table, for contractor performance are structured to allow the contractor to manage how the work is performed while providing negative incentives for performance shortfalls. For certain critical activities , the desired performance level is established at 100 percent. Other levels of performance are keyed to the relative importance of the task to the overall performance.

5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION

5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop

The performance management feedback loop begins with the communication of expected outcomes. Performance standards are expressed in the PWS and are assessed using the performance monitoring techniques shown in Attachment 1.

5.2 Monitoring Forms

The Government’s QA surveillance, accomplished by the PCO, COR or TR, will be reported using the monitoring forms in Attachment 2. The forms, when completed, will document the government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance under the contract to ensure that the required results are being achieved.

5.2.1 The PCO/COR will retain a copy of all completed QA surveillance forms.

6 ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT

6.1 Determining Performance

6.1.1 Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/AQLs have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels.

6.2 Reporting

6.2.1 At the end of each quarter, the PCO/COR will prepare a written report summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the contractor’s performance. This written report, which includes the contractor’s submitted monthly report and the completed quality assurance monitoring forms (Attachment 2), will become part of the QA documentation. It will enable the government to demonstrate whether the contractor is meeting the stated objectives and/or performance standards, including cost/technical/scheduling objectives.

6.3 Reviews and Resolution

6.3.1 The PCO, COR or TR may require the contractor’s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the government personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The PCO/COR will define a frequency of in-depth reviews with the contractor, including appropriate self-assessments by the contractor; however, if the need arises, the contractor will meet with the COR as often as required or per the contractor’s request. The agenda of the reviews may include:

Quarterly performance assessment data and trend analysis Issues and concerns of both parties Projected outlook for upcoming months and progress against expected trends, including a corrective action plan analysis Recommendations for improved efficiency and/or effectiveness

6.3.2 The PCO, COR or TR and contractor should jointly formulate tactical and long-term courses of action. Decisions regarding changes to metrics, thresholds, or service levels should be clearly documented. Changes to service levels, procedures, and metrics if applicable will be incorporated as a contract modification.

ATTACHMENT 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Performance Objective Standard Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

PRS # 1. Qualified and Trained Personnel. The Contractor provides sufficient and adequately trained workforce capable of fully complying with all the requirements of the PWS 100% of the time.

Manage day to day operations and activities to ensure successful compliance with the contract. This includes but is not limited to providing adequate staffing, managing workload, training, retention and supporting each activity as prescribed by the PWS in a complete and professional manner.

*No instances of failure to present a professional appearance.

*No instances of failure to engage in professional, courteous and polite conduct.

*No instances of failure to work as a team player.

*No instances of providing personnel who do not meet the minimum experience requirements.

COR

Observation, Customer feedback.

Performance Objective

PWS

Paragraph

Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

Performance Incentive

PRS # 1

Contractor shall perform Routine Maintenance in accordance with the timelines and standards established in this PWS.

PWS 3.1 Contractor will be in violation of performance standard if unable to demonstrate the services performed meet industry and safety standards.

COR

Observation and Validated Customer Complaint received by

COR.

CPARS rating.

Contractor responsible for rework. Any expenditures associated with rework are the responsibility of the contractor. Government will not provide additional funding for rework activities.

PRS # 3

Contractor shall provide required hard copy and electronic reports, with specified information as called out in the “Contract Deliverables” section of the PWS.

PWS 5.0 Contractor will be in violation of performance standard if required reports are not received within the timeframe established under section 5.0

COR

Observation and Validated Customer Complaint received by

COR.

CPARS ratings.

Contractor responsible for rework. Any expenditures associated with rework are the responsibility of the contractor. Government will not provide additional funding for rework activities.

PRS # 2 Quality Services.

The Contractor is synergistic, proactive, and thorough and organized enough to ensure work is timely and accurate.

Manage daily operations and activities to ensure successful completion of all tasks outlined in the PWS. The Contractor demonstrates reasonable and cooperative behavior, a commitment to customer satisfaction, and a concern for the interest of the customers. Work products are timely, accurate, technically correct, in accordance with sound practices and principals.

* No more than 2 valid complaints per year that work contains inaccuracies.

* No more than 2 valid complaints per year that services are late or contractor is not making sufficient progress on completing the required services.

* No more than 2 valid complaints per year that written or verbal communication is ineffective.

COR

Observation, Customer feedback.

ATTACHMENT 2: QUALITY ASSURANCE

MONITORING FORM

SERVICE or STANDARD:

SURVEY PERIOD:

SURVEILLANCE METHOD (Check):

Random Sampling 100% Inspection Periodic Inspection Customer Complaint

LEVEL OF SURVEILLANCE (Check):

Monthly Quarterly As needed

PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS SAMPLED DURING SURVEY PERIOD: ______ %

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS:

Observed Service Provider Performance Measurement Rate: ______%

Service Provider’s Performance (Check): Meets Standards Does Not Meet Standards

Narrative of Performance During Survey Period:

PREPARED BY: ___________________________________ DATE: _________________