Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

25 KB Posted

Attached to
Stennis MS Mini Mart Cafe zero cost contract services
Solicitation number
040ADV-25-Q-0025
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire used by the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) to evaluate contractor performance across multiple dimensions. The form is designed to assess a contractor's performance on key areas including quality of products and services, overall performance, schedule adherence, technical requirements, cost control, subcontracting success, and customer satisfaction. Evaluators can rate performance levels from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory across nine distinct evaluation categories, with the option to note weak points, strong points, and likelihood of repeat business.

The questionnaire is directly related to a specific solicitation (040ADV-25-Q-0025) for a zero-cost contract to provide Mini Mart Cafe services at the Stennis, MS facility. The contract will be awarded based on the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process, with compensation derived from food and drink sales transactions. Multiple contracts may be awarded, and offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), submit proposals to specified GPO contacts, and maintain proposal validity for 120 days. The solicitation emphasizes full, accurate information submission and follows Materials Management Acquisition Regulation (MMAR) guidelines.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FINAL 040ADV-25-Q-0025-C0001 Stennis Mini Mart Cafe SF30.pdf PDF
3.0 Attachment 1 Prices list.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
040ADV-25-Q-0025 final 07 02 25.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment J.2 Past Performance Questionnaire

ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services 732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401

Email: Paige Menard at pmenard@gpo.gov

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS

3. CONTRACT NO.:

CONTRACT DATE:

4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

4. PACE OF PERFORMANCE:

5. COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE $

2. PROJECT NAME:
7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:

EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)

EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER

MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very GoodS = SatisfactoryMG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
|_|EX|_|VG|_|S|_|MG|_|US|_|N/O

List Contractor’s Weak Points:

List Contractor’s Strong Points:

List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:

If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .