Attachment J.1 Fac 667 Insp Report '17.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- POL Tank Inspection ISP - Creech AFB
- Solicitation number
- W9128F23Q0024
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment J.3 Fac 669 OOS Insp Report '14.pdf | ||
| Attachment I - API External Inspection Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - W9128F23Q0024.pdf | ||
| Attachment D - Monthly Conctractors Progress Management and Status Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J.2 Fac 667 OOS Insp Report '13.pdf | ||
| Attachment A - General Installation Security Requirements.pdf | ||
| Attachment B - Fuel Storage Tank List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment C - Fuel Storage Tank Excel Document.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers |
| Omaha | District |
| API | 653 | In‐Service |
| Inspection | Report |
| Indian | Springs | AFB, | NV |
| Tank | #1 | (Facility | 667) |
US Army Corps of Engineers Center of Expertise for Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants
(USACE POL‐MCX)
11/15/2017
API-653 In-Service Inspection Report Tank 1 (Facility 667) Indian Springs AFB, NV
| Table | of | Contents | ||
| ACRONYMS | AND | ABBREVIATIONS | .................................................................................................................................................. | 3 |
GENERAL SUMMARY
INSPECTION DATE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES
RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES (CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED)
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. API 653 Inspection
2. Site Information
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
1. Tank Construction
2. Tank Foundation
3. Tank Shell
4. Tank Appurtenances
5. Tank Coating
6. Tank Piping System
7. Fire Protection System
8. Secondary Containment
C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per API 653, UFC 3‐460‐01, or AW 78‐24‐27 Standards
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with API 653, or, Federal, State, and Local Codes
| 3. | RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | TO | FULLY | COMPLY | WITH | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | AW | 78‐24‐27 |
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | .................................................................................................................. | 10 |
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: ENGINEERING DATA
APPENDIX D: STI SP001 INSEPCTION CHECKLIST
APPENDIX E: PHOTOGRAPHS
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing
ATG Automatic Tank Gauge
BBL Barrel
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CP Cathodic Protection
DFT Dry Film Thickness
HLA High Level Alarm
HLCS High Level Control Shutoff
HHLA High‐High Level Alarm
LLA Low Level Alarm
LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm
MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage
MT Magnetic Particle Testing
NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NDT Non‐Destructive Testing
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PT Penetrant Testing
P/V Pressure/Vacuum
RP Recommended Practice
PST Product Saver Tank
RT Radiography Testing
TML Thickness Measurement Location
TRV Thermal Relief Valve
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications
ULS Ultra Low Sulfur
UT Ultrasonic Testing
VT Visual Testing
| GENERAL | SUMMARY | |
| Summary | of | Inspection |
| An | API | Standard | 653 | In‐Service | inspection | of | Tank | #1 | (Facility | 667) | at | Indian | Springs | AFB, | NV | was |
| completed | on | November | 29, | 2017. | The | shell | service | life | evaluation | performed | as | having | greater | |||
| than | 30 | years | of | remaining | shell | life | under | current | conditions. |
| Significant | Findings | (overview) | |||||||||||
| 1. The | secondary | containment | does | not | satisfy | NFPA | 30 | with | intermediate | berm | wall | height | of |
| at | least | 18 | inches | between | the | tanks. | |||||||||
| 2. The | HDPE | liner | of | the | secondary | containment | area | has | three | tears | at | the | issue | line | pipe |
supports.
| 3. The | 6‐inch | issue | line | does | not | have | a | thermal | relief | line. | ||||
| 4. The | tank | does | not | have | a | low | suction | line. | ||||||
| 5. The | tank | has | a | grounding | cable | around | the | circumference | of | the | tank. | The | tank | grounding |
| cable | is | exothermically | welded | directly | to | the | shell | at | three | locations | and | is | not |
| exothermically | welded | to | the | ground | lug | on | the | shell. |
| 6. The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | an | ENRAF | ATG | system. | ||||||
| 7. The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | a | VITO | water | and | temperature | probe. | ||||
| 8. The | fixed | roof | does | not | have | any | API | scaffold | supports. | ||||||
| 9. The | fixed | roof | does | not | have | a | handrail | around | the | perimeter | of | the | roof. | The | roof |
| circulation | vents\inspection | hatches | require | fall | protection | when | conducting | annual |
| inspections | of | the | floating | roof | and | seals. |
10. The tank does not have a facility label.
| INSPECTION | DATE | |||||
| API | In‐Service | Inspection | Date: | November | 29, | 2017 |
| Equipment | Used: | Ultra‐Sonic | Thickness | Meter | ||
| Manufacturer: | General | Electric | ||||
| Model: | DMS | 2 | ||||
| Calibration | Methods | Used: | Zeroing | Procedure, | Copper | Coating |
| Calibration | Procedure, | and | Two | Point |
| Calibration | Procedure |
| Inspector(s): | Wayne | K. | Bailey | ||
| API | 653 | Inspector | No. | 1331 |
| Equipment | Used: | Surveying | Tool | ||
| Manufacturer: | Leica | ||||
| Model: | 3D | DISTO | |||
| Calibration | Methods | Used: | Manufacturer | ||
| Inspector(s): | Wayne | K. | Bailey | ||
| API | 653 | Inspector | No. | 1331 |
| STATE | REGULATIONS | |||
| API | In‐Service | Tank | Inspections: | N/A |
| API | Out‐of‐Service | Tank | Inspections: | N/A |
| NOTE: | If | there | are | no | state | regulations | for | tank | inspections | then | N/A | shall | reside | in‐place | of | the |
| number | of | years | between | inspections. | If | state | regulations | reside, | the | recommended | future | |||||
| inspections | dates | shall | be | based | on | whichever | is | more | stringent | between | the | STI | inspector’s | |||
| calculations | and | the | State | regulations. |
| PREVIOUS | INSPECTION | DATES | ||||
| API | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | January | 2014 |
| API | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | January | 2014 |
| RECOMMENDED | FUTURE | INSPECTION | DATES | (CALCULATIONS | SHALL | BE | PROVIDED) | ||
| API | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | Unknown | (report | was | not | available) |
| API | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | November | 2022 |
Wayne K. Bailey, API‐653 #1331
| GENERAL | TANK | INFORMATION |
| ITEM | DESCRIPTION |
| Owner | US | Air | Force | ||||
| Location | Indian | Springs | AFB | ||||
| Facility | Number | 667 | |||||
| Tank | Number | 1 | |||||
| State | / | Country | Nevada, | United | States | ||
| City | Indian | Springs | |||||
| Inspection | Date | November | 29, | 2017 | |||
| Tank | Manufacturer | Original: | Brown | Tank | & | Steel | |
| Design | Standard | API | Standard | 650 |
| Date | of | Construction | Original: | 1979 | |
| Reconstructed: | 5/2014 | by | Weston | Solutions, | Inc. |
| Tank | Contents | Jet | A | |||||||
| Tank | Serial | Number | Unknown | |||||||
| Tank | Diameter | 18’ | ||||||||
| Shell | Height | 16’ | ½” | |||||||
| Product | Height | 14’ | 0” | (based | on | RONAN | system | high‐high | level | alarm) |
| Tank | Capacity | 26,000 | gallons | (estimated) | (based | on | RONAN | system) | ||
| Foundation | Concrete | Pad |
Construction
| Bottom | Lap‐Welded | ||
| Shell | Butt‐Welded | (Cylindrical) | |
| Floating | Roof | Yes | |
| Fixed | Roof | Lap‐Welded |
Material
| Bottom | Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade | ||
| Shell | Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade | ||
| Floating | Roof | Aluminum | Honey | Comb | ||
| Fixed | Roof | Carbon | Steel, | Unknown | Grade |
| Cathodic | Protection | None | ||||||||||
| Interior | Coating | System | Epoxy | |||||||||
| Exterior | Coating | System | Thin | Film | Epoxy/Polyurethane | |||||||
| Level | Gauging | VAREC | MTG, | RONAN | ATG, | and | No | VITO | Water | & | Temp | Probe |
| Overfill | Protection | Mechanical | Automatic | Shut‐Off |
Piping
| Receipt | 4" | Carbon | Steel | |
| Issue | 6" | Carbon | Steel | |
| Low | Suction | NA | None | |
| Water | Draw‐Off | 1" | Stainless | Steel |
Level Alarms & Controls
| Description | RONAN | ATG | Independent | |||||
| High‐High | Level | Alarm: | 14’ | 00‐00/16” | 14’ | 00‐00/16” | ||
| High‐Level | Alarm: | 12’ | 10‐09/16” | 12’ | 10‐09/16” | |||
| Low‐Level | Alarm: | 2’ | 04‐15/16” | 2’ | 04‐15/16” | |||
| Low‐Low | Level | Alarm: | 1’ | 09‐00/16” | 1’ | 09‐00/16” | ||
| High‐Level | Control | Shut‐ |
off:
12’ 10”
Type of Internal Floating Roof
Aluminum Honey Comb
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
| 1. API | 653 | Inspection | ||||||||||
| This | project | will | perform | API | 653 | inspections | of | various | tanks | at | facilities | throughout |
| the | United | States. | Additional | consideration | is | given | to | federal, | state, | and | local | |
| regulations, | as | well | as | applicable | military | criteria | and | general | industry | standards. |
An API Standard 653 In‐Service inspection was performed for Tank #1 (Facility 667).
| 2. Site | Information | ||||||||||||
| On | November | 29, | 2017 | Argus | Consulting | and | our | sub‐consultant | (InterSpec, | LLC) | |||
| performed | an | API | 653 | In‐Service | inspection | of | Tank | 1 | (Facility | 667), | located | at | Indian |
| Springs | AFB, | NV. |
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
| 1. Tank | Construction | |||||||||||||||
| Tank | 1 | (Facility | 667) | is | a | nominal | 30,000 | gallon, | 18’ | diameter | by | 16’ | ½” | tall, | Jet | A, |
| aboveground | vertical | storage | tank. | The | original | construction | nameplate | was | not | affixed | ||||||
| to | the | tank. | The | tank | was | reconstructed | and | upgraded | by | Weston | Solutions, | Inc. | in |
5/2014.
| 2. Tank | Foundation | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | rests | on | a | concrete | pad. | The | tank | does | not | have | a | cathodic | protection | system |
| and | bottom | leak | detection. | The | tank | has | secondary | containment. | The | foundation | was | ||||
| visually | evaluated | during | the | inspection | for | broken | concrete, | spalling, | cracks, | and | |||||
| vegetation | against | the | bottom | of | the | tank. | The | tank | bottom | to | pad | sealant | was | ||
| inspected; | it | is | in | satisfactory | condition. | A | shell | settlement | survey | was | performed | ||||
| during | the | inspection | in | accordance | with | Appendix | B | of | API | Standard | 653. | Settlement | |||
| results | are | listed | in | Appendix | A. |
| 3. Tank | Shell | ||||||||||||||
| The | shell | is | constructed | of | carbon | steel | material. | The | shell | is | a | cylindrical | design, | butt‐ | |
| welded | together, | consisting | of | two | (2) | courses. | The | shell | exterior | has | a | thin | film | epoxy | |
| coating | system. | The | coating | was | inspected | for | disbonding, | adhesion, | deterioration, | and | |||||
| discoloration; | it | is | in | satisfactory | condition. | The | shell | was | evaluated | for | remaining | metal | |||
| thickness | utilizing | ultrasonic | technology. | The | ultrasonic | thickness | measurements | and | |||||||
| thickness | measurement | locations | (TML) | are | listed | in | the | Shell | Plate | Thickness | |||||
| Measurements | table | in | Appendix | A. | A | shell | service | life | evaluation | performed | on | all | shell | ||
| courses | shows | the | shell | has | a | remaining | life | of | greater | than | 30 | years | under | current | |
| conditions. | The | shell | service | life | evaluation | is | shown | in | the | Shell | Service | Life | Evaluation | ||
| table | in | Appendix | A. | Roundness, | plumbness, | peaking, | and | banding | of | the | shell | are | all | ||
| within | the | allowable | tolerances | of | API | Standard | 653. | The | tank | appears | to | be | stable | and |
does not appear to be in danger of overturning or buckling due to high winds or seismic conditions.
4. Tank Appurtenances
a. Gauging
| A | RONAN | ATG | is | installed | for | electronic | gauging. | Manual | sampling | and | |
| gauging | is | afforded | through | a | manual | sample | gauge. | The | mechanical | tape | |
| level | gauge | is | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| b. Level | Alarms | ||||||||||
| The | high | and | high‐high | level | alarm | assembly | is | mounted | on | the | exterior |
| adjacent | to | the | vertical | ladder | for | independent | alarms | with | a | platform | for |
| access. | The | electronic | gauging | is | equipped | with | high | and | high‐high | level | and |
| low | and | low‐low | level | alarms. |
| c. Ladder | and | Platforms | |||||||||||
| The | tank’s | fixed | roof | is | accessible | by | a | vertical | ladder | mounted | on | the | shell |
| of | the | tank. |
| d. Grounding | and | Bonding | ||||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | grounding | cable | around | the | circumference | of | the | tank. | The |
| tank | grounding | cable | is | exothermically | welded | directly | to | the | shell | at | three | |
| locations | and | is | not | exothermically | welded | to | the | ground | lug | on | the | shell. |
| 5. Tank | Coating | |||||||||||||
| The | exterior | coating | is | an | epoxy | with | polyurethane | top | coat; | the | exterior | coating | is | in |
| satisfactory | condition. |
| 6. Tank | Piping | System | ||||
| Fuel | is | received | and | issued | by | trucks. |
| 7. Fire | Protection | System | |||
| The | fire | department | provides | fire | protection. |
| 8. Secondary | Containment | |||||||||||||
| 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | system, | “including | walls | |||
| and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | constructed | so | that | any |
| discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | escape | containment | before | |||
| cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | ||
| must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | The | purpose | of | the | secondary | |||
| containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges, | as | described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | |||
| therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | ||
| oil | is | cleaned | up. | The | secondary | containment | area | consists | of | an | earthen | floor | with | |
| sloped | earthen | walls | that | has | a | flexible | membrane | liner. | An | informal | containment | |||
| evaluation | was | conducted. | The | containment | appears | to | be | of | sufficient | size | to | contain | a | |
| total | tank | loss | per | UFC | 3‐460‐1, | paragraph | 8‐14.2.1, | “The | containment | area | needs | to | ||
| have | sufficient | capacity | to | contain | the | tank | contents | plus | one | foot | of | freeboard. | If | the |
| containment | has | the | capacity | to | contain | the | tank | contents | plus | one | foot | of | freeboard, | ||
| the | containment | area | is | sufficient.” | The | secondary | containment | berm | wall | has | a | cutout | |||
| for | piping; | thus | it | does | not | satisfy | NFPA | 30 | requirements | for | an | intermediate | berm | wall | |
| height | of | at | least | 18 | inches. | Furthermore, | the | secondary | containment | does | not | have | |||
| intermediate | berm | walls | between | the | tanks. | The | secondary | containment | area | appears | |||||
| to | be | properly | graded | to | drain | water | away | from | the | tank | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30. |
| C. FINDINGS | AND | RECOMMENDATIONS | ||||||||
| The | following | information | identifies | the | significant | findings | found | during | the | tank |
inspection:
| 1. MANDATORY | REPAIRS | per | API | 653, | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | or | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Standards | ||
| Mandatory | repairs | represent | items | that | require | immediate | attention, | in | order | to | ||
| prevent | imminent | risk | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | adjacent | ||
| environment. | The | tank | should | remain | out | of | service | until | these | repairs | are | completed. |
a. None.
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with API 653 or Federal, State, and Local Codes
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in | ||
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | ||
| adjacent | environment. | These | items | may | be | required | by | federal, | state | and | local | codes, | or | |
| by | military | criteria. |
| a. Secondary | Containment | Berm | Walls | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | secondary | containment | berm | wall | has | a | cutout | for | piping; | thus | it | |
| does | not | satisfy | NFPA | 30 | requirements | for | an | intermediate | berm | wall | height | of | at |
| least | 18 | inches. | Furthermore, | the | secondary | containment | does | not | have | intermediate | |||
| berm | walls | between | the | tanks. | |||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30 | Section | 22.11.2.6. | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Design | and | install | intermediate | walls | between | the | tanks | to | ||||
| meet | the | requirements | of | NFPA | 30. |
| b. Secondary | Containment | Liner | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | HDPE | liner | of | the | secondary | containment | has | three | tears | at | the | ||||
| base | of | the | issue | line | pipe | supports | and | is | not | able | to | contain | the | product | until | the |
| product | is | cleaned | up | as | required | by | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b). | |||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b). | ||||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | HDPE | tears | at | the | base | of | the | issue | line | pipe | supports. |
| c. API | Scaffold | Supports | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | roof | does | not | have | any | API | scaffold | supports. | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | Table | 8‐1, | Item | (ff) | and | API | Standard | 650, | Section |
5.8.8.
RECOMMENDATION: Install two (2) API scaffold supports.
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | TO | FULLY | COMPLY | WITH | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | AW | 78‐24‐27 | |||
| Standards, | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | ||||||
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. |
| a. Low | Suction | Line | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | a | 4‐inch | low | suction | line | in | accordance | |||
| with | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | G.05 | and | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | A3 | and | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | |||
| 8‐1 | Item | (v). | The | low | suction | line | minimizes | the | loss | of | product | by | allowing | the | tank | |
| to | be | completely | drawn | down | for | maintenance | and | inspections. | ||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | G.05 | and | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | A3 | and | UFC | 3‐ | |||
| 460‐01 | Table | 8‐1 | Item | (v). | ||||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | low | suction | line | in | accordance | with | AW | 78‐24‐27 | ||||||
| Drawing | G.05 | and | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | A3 | and | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8‐1 | Item | (v). |
| b. Issue | Line | Thermal | Relief | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | issue | line | does | not | have | a | thermal | relief | line. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | Section | 9‐2.1 | (h). | ||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | thermal | relief | line | on | the | receipt | line. |
| c. ENRAF | ATG | System | |||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | an | ENRAF | ATG | system | in | accordance | |||
| with | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | 4 | and | the | ATG | policy | per | the | letter | issued | by |
| the | Defense | Logistics | Agency. | The | tank | does | a | have | a | slotted | stilling | well | to | ||
| accommodate | the | ENRAF | system. | ||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | 4. | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | an | automatic | tank | gauge | ENRAF | system | to | meet | the | ATG | ||||
| policy | per | the | letter | issued | by | the | Defense | Logistics | Agency. |
| d. VITO | Water | and | Temperature | System | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | is | not | equipped | with | a | water | probe | stilling | well | (VITO | ||
| system) | to | meet | the | ATG | policy | per | the | letter | issued | by | the | Defense | Logistics | Agency. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.07 | Detail | 3. | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | an | automatic | tank | gauge | water | probe | (VITO | system) | |||||
| and | stilling | well | to | meet | the | ATG | policy | per | the | letter | issued | by | the | Defense |
| Logistics | Agency. |
| e. Tank | Grounding | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | has | a | grounding | cable | around | the | circumference | of | the | tank. |
| The | tank | grounding | cable | is | exothermically | welded | directly | to | the | shell | at | three |
| locations | and | is | not | exothermically | welded | to | the | ground | lug | on | the | shell. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | ED.02 | Details | 1 | and | 2. | |||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Reconfigure | the | grounding | cables | with | exothermic | weld | |||||
| connections | to | ground | lugs | on | the | shell. |
| f. Roof | Perimeter | Handrail | |||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | roof | does | not | have | a | guardrail | around | the | perimeter | of | the | roof. | ||||
| The | roof | is | an | umbrella | type | design | with | a | steep | slope. | Roof | access | is | a | safety | hazard | |
| for | routine | inspections | and | maintenance. | Fall | protection | is | required | in | accordance | |||||||
| with | OSHA | unless | a | guardrail | around | the | perimeter | of | the | roof | is | installed. | Access | is | |||
| required | to | the | roof | circulation | vents\inspection | hatches | to | inspect | the | floating | roof | ||||||
| and | seals | on | an | annual | basis. | ||||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | AW | 78‐24‐27 | Drawing | D.11 | Detail | 5. | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | guardrail | around | the | perimeter | of | the | roof. |
| g. Facility | Labeling | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | a | facility | label. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC‐3‐460‐01 | Section | 2‐18. | ||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | facility | label | on | the | tank. |
A-1 t min t nom t act t prev
D H
H c
G Y
T
S
E
L r
C r
I ut
I v
Y tmin
H DG
SE
Lr tact tmin
Cr Cr tprev tact Y Iut tact tmin Cr
Iv tact tmin
Cr
A-2 tprev tact tmin
A-3
Corrosion Rate
A-4
Thickness tmin
Thickness tmin
A-5
S max
A-6
S i | U i U i-1 U i+1
A-7
Fe et
Data Points
A-8
A-9
A-10
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #1 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #2 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #3 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #4 Radius (inches)
A-11
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #5 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #6 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #7 Radius (inches)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
Vertical Profile #8 Radius (inches)
A-12
Appendix B
Engineering Drawings
1. Shell Layout
2. Fixed Roof Layout
3. Secondary Containment Layout
B-1
R em ar ks
/L eg en d:
O w ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
In di an S pr in gs A
F B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
9/
N /A
N /A
T an k #1 fa ci lit y
7) S
-1 S he ll
La yo ut
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e fir st m an ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts id e.
T he n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se a nd po si tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
A
B C D E F
A T
G
2-
1-
G H
2-
A
6"
M an ho le
B
H ig h Le ve l C on tr ol A ss em bl ie s C
H ig h
Le ve l C on tr ol
A ss em bl ie s
D
Lo w
L ev el C on tr ol A ss em bl ie s E
Lo w L ev el
C on tr ol
A ss em bl ie s
F
R ec ei pt
L in e G
W at er
D ra w -O ff H
W at er
D ra w -O ff
B-2 ar ks
/L eg en d:
O w ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
In di an S pr in gs A
F B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
9/
N /A
N /A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
S -2
S he ll La yo ut
S ea m is th e fir st s ea m le ft of th e fir st m an ho le le ft of th e st ai rw ay in th e fir st s he ll co ur se v ie w in g fr om th e ou ts id e.
T he n um be r in th e up pe r le ft co rn er o f e ac h pl at e id en tif ie s th e pl at e by th e co ur se a nd po si tio n of th e pl at e in th at c ou rs e.
0G R
A P
H
IC
S C
A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et
1-
I
J
O ve rf lo w V en t
2-
I -
4" M an ho le J
6"
Is su e Li ne
B-3 ar ks
/L eg en d:
O w ne r/
O pe ra to r:
In sp ec tio n F irm
D at e:
R ev is io n
N um be r:
R ev is io n D at e:
D ra w in g T itl e:
T an k D es cr ip tio n:
D ra w in g
N um be r:
In di an S pr in gs A
F B
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
9/
N /A
N /A
T an k #1
F ac ili ty
R -1
F ix ed R oo f L ay ou t
M ea su re d D ia m et er is fe et
F ix ed r oo f h as p la te s.
0.
0G
R A
P H
IC
S
C A
LE
D im en si on s ar e in fe et y x N W y x
N E y x
S E y xS W
X Y
O rie nt at io n
X Y
O rie nt at io n is in r ef er en ce to
P la n N or th
1 2 3 4
A
A
V en t B
B la nk
C
J- V en t
D
R oo f C irc ul at io n
V en t\I ns pe ct io n
H at ch E
C ap F
B la nk
G
0"
E le ct ro ni c
Le ve l I nd ic at or H
0" S am pl e G au ge
I -
4" M an ho le J
6"
P /V
V en t K
H at ch
D M
T G
B
G
H
I
J
K
F E
D
C
C
E
V er tic al
La dd er
B-4
C om pa ny
D ra w n
B y:
D at e:
R ev . N o.
S ca le
D ra w in g T itl e:
In di an S pr in gs A
F B
, N V
In te rS pe c
LL
C
/2
9/
N /A
N A
S ec on da ry C on ta in m en t L ay ou t
T an k
#1 (F ac ili ty
T an k #2
T an k #3 an k
#4 (F ac ili ty
P S
T
P R
T 6"
Is su e
Li ne
6" Is su
L in e
6" R ec ei pt e
4" R ec ei pt ru ck O ffl oa d/ Lo ad
T an k #6
A V
G A
S
T an k #5
A V
G A
S
T an k #1
D ie se l
T an k #2
D ie se l
T an k #3
G as ol in e
T an k #4
G as ol in e
3" AVGAS
3" Diesel
3" Gasoline 3" Vapor Recovery
D is pe ns or
D is pe ns or
D is pe ns or
D is pe ns or
1/ 2"
1/ 2"
1/ 2"
4"
P S
TT
ea r T ea r
T ea r
B-5
Appendix C
Engineering Data
1. Shell Settlement Measurements
2. Shell Plate Thickness Measurements
3. Shell Nozzle, Nozzle Reinforcement, and Insert Measurements
4. Fixed Roof Thickness Measurements
5. Accessway Measurements
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
Appendix D
API Standard 653 Checklists for Tank Inspections
1. Tank In-Service Inspection Checklist
D-1
D-2
D-3
D-4
D-5
D-6
D-7
D-8
D-9
Appendix E
Photographs
E-1
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-10
E-11
E-12
E-13
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .