Attachment J-3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 85 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GPO G-Street Sidewalk Repair
- Solicitation number
- 040ADV-26-R-0010
- Issued by
-
Government Publishing Office
About this file
This file is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor experience and historical performance on similar projects. The questionnaire serves as an evaluation tool for the G Street Sidewalk and Vault Ceiling Repair Project solicitation issued by the Government Publishing Office under solicitation number 040ADV-26-R-0010.
As a template document, this questionnaire does not contain specific performance requirements or evaluation criteria details, but rather provides the framework through which offerors will be asked to demonstrate their qualifications. Offerors responding to the sidewalk repair solicitation will use this questionnaire to document their past performance on comparable structural repair and restoration projects involving sidewalk and vault ceiling work. The questionnaire is intended to support the Government's evaluation of proposals under the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) criteria, allowing the Government to assess whether prospective contractors possess the requisite experience and track record to successfully execute this Firm Fixed Price contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 040ADV-26-R-0010.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-4 -Cost-Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-1 DWGS.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-2 G-Street Sidewalk Repair Spec.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-5 DBA Wage Determination Washington DC.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J-3 Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this questionnaire and send by email to: gstevens@gpo.gov and twhite@gpo.gov
U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services
732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401 Response Due Date July 2, 2026, at 5:00 PM EST
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
3. CONTRACT NO.:
CONTRACT DATE:
4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
4. PACE OF PERFORMANCE:
5. COMPLETION DATE:
6. CONTRACT VALUE $
2. PROJECT NAME:
7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:
EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)
EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER
MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
List Contractor’s Weak Points:
List Contractor’s Strong Points:
List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:
If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .