Attachment IV - Past Performance Questionnaire (Autosaved).docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223RNWWG0005
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor reference related to solicitation number 1305M223RNWWG0005 for the National Weather Service Radiosonde Frequency Migration Project (RFMP) Upper Air Inflation Buildings (UAIB) Dome Removal and Roof Remediation. The questionnaire asks the reference to rate the contractor's performance on quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management using rating definitions of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. It also includes areas for additional comments. Responses are requested by July 21, 2023 to the identified contracting specialist.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| NWS Radome Removal Pre-Proposal Conference Meeting Minutes 07112023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment III - Past Performance Information Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 1305M223RNWWG0005 - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Radome Removal Pre-Proposal Conf Brief_V12.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attachment IV - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section B - Pricing Schedule of Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment I - Dome Removal PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment II - Appendix A Site Locations.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment V - Wage Determinations.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M223RNWWG0005
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Nicole Frie, no later than July 21, 2023 5:00pm Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________
Source Selection Information
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .