Attachment H - Phase I Environment Assessment.PDF

CIVIL ENGINEERING | ENVIRONMENTAL | SURVEYING | GIS | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES www.timmons.com

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

HOCKETT ROAD

GOOCHLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PREPARED FOR:

GOOCHLAND COUNTY

1800 SANDY HOOK ROAD

GOOCHLAND, VIRGINIA 23063

PREPARED BY:

TIMMONS GROUP

1001 BOULDERS PARKWAY, SUITE 300

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23225

Inspection Date: January 19, 2021 Report Publication Date: January 26, 2021

Exhibit F i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 General Site Description

2.2 Current Use of the Subject Property

2.3 Description of Site Structures

2.4 Site Utilities

2.5 Current Use of Adjoining Properties

2.6 Purpose and Scope of Services

2.7 Limitations and Exceptions of the Assessment

2.8 Special Terms and Conditions

2.9 Methodology Used

2.10 User Reliance

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

4.1 Physical Setting

4.1.1 Regional Geology

4.1.2 Hydrogeology

4.1.3 Topography

4.1.4 Soils

4.1.5 Floodplain

4.1.6 Wetlands

4.2 Regulatory Database Review

4.2.1 Federal Database Review

4.2.2 State Database Review

4.2.3 Supplementary Database Review

4.2.4 Unplottable Summary

4.3 Historical Use Information

4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs

4.3.2 Historical Directories

4.3.3 Historical Topographic Maps

4.3.4 Fire Insurance Maps

4.3.5 Environmental Lien Search

4.3.6 Previous Reports

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

5.1 Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products

5.2 Storage Tanks

ii

5.3 Vapor Migration

5.4 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

5.5 Heating and Cooling

5.6 Stained Soil/Pavement and/or Stressed Vegetation

5.7 Pits, Ponds and/or Lagoons/Pools of Liquids

5.8 Odors

5.9 Drains and/or Sumps

5.10 Railroad Tracks

5.11 Wells

5.12 Discarded and Solid Waste Materials

5.13 Adjoining Properties

6.0 INTERVIEWS

7.0 EVALUATION

7.1 Findings

7.2 Data Gaps

7.3 Opinions for Additional Investigation

7.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.0 REFERENCES

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Site Mapping and Physical Setting Report

Appendix 2 Property Information

Appendix 3 Interviews

Appendix 4 Regulatory Database Review

Appendix 5 Historical Aerial Photographs

Appendix 6 Historical Directories

Appendix 7 Historical Topographic Maps

Appendix 8 Fire Insurance Maps

Appendix 9 Environmental Lien Search

Appendix 10 Site Reconnaissance Photographs

Appendix 11 Environmental Professional Qualifications

Hockett Road – Phase I ESA Project No. 41372.014

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess the nature, history, and setting of real property. We have developed and performed “all appropriate inquiry” in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Chase Farnsworth IV, REM Senior Environmental Scientist

Cole Farnsworth Environmental Scientist I

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

At the request of Goochland County (hereafter the “User”), and in accordance with 40 CFR Part 312, and ASTM Standard E 1527-13, Timmons Group completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia (hereafter the “Subject Property” or “Site”). Based on our understanding, the Site is under evaluation for acquisition and development.

This assessment was completed to evaluate the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) on the Subject Property or adjoining properties based on a review of reasonably available environmental resource information and/or site observations. The assessment was also performed to allow the User to qualify for landowner liability protections (LLPs), including the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser (BFPP) liability protection, available under federal and state law. RECs are defined by ASTM standards as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment or under conditions that pose a material threat of future release.”

Likewise, this Phase I ESA evaluated the presence of Historical RECs (HRECs) and/or Controlled RECs (CRECs) as defined by ASTM standards. A HREC is “an environmental condition which in the past would have been considered a REC, but which may or may not currently be considered a REC.” A CREC is “a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g., property use restrictions, activity use limitations, institutional controls and/or engineering controls).”

Site Description

The Subject Property is comprised of approximately 24.31 acres of undeveloped woodlands located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia.

Environmental Conditions on the Subject Property

As a result of the Phase I ESA, RECs were not identified for the Subject Property as defined by ASTM Standard E 1527-13.

Environmental Conditions on Adjoining Properties

The Subject Property is bordered to the north by two private residences, cleared land, and undeveloped woodlands; to the east by undeveloped woodlands, Carmax, and Interstate 288; to the south by undeveloped woodlands and Tuckahoe Creek Parkway; and to the west by Hockett Road and residential development. As a result of site reconnaissance and reviewed resource data, RECs were not identified for the adjoining properties.

Data Gaps

No significant data gaps were encountered during the completion of this Phase I ESA.

Conclusions and Recommended Response Actions

Timmons Group completed a Phase I ESA of approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia. Based on the results, RECs were not identified for the Subject Property or adjoining properties as defined by ASTM Standard E 1527-13. Therefore, Timmons Group recommends no further action.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 General Site Description

The Subject Property consists of one parcel totaling approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia (Appendix 1) with property details included in Appendix 2.

2.2 Current Use of the Subject Property

The Site consists of undeveloped woodlands.

2.3 Description of Site Structures

No structures are currently present on the Subject Property.

2.4 Site Utilities

The Subject Property is not currently connected to public utilities.

2.5 Current Use of Adjoining Properties

Adjoining Properties

North: Two private residences, cleared land, and undeveloped woodlands

East: Undeveloped woodlands, Carmax, and Interstate 288

South: Undeveloped woodlands and Tuckahoe Creek Parkway

West: Hockett Road and residential development

2.6 Purpose and Scope of Services

This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Part 312 and ASTM Standard E 1527-13 to identify RECs based on a review of reasonably accessible environmental resource information in conjunction with site observations. The assessment was also performed to allow the User to qualify for any LLPs, including the BFPP liability protection, available under federal and state law. RECs are defined as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment or under conditions that pose a material threat of future release.” The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions of regulatory compliance. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that “generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate government agencies.”

The purpose of this Phase I ESA report is to provide the User with an assessment of approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia. The scope of work included:

reviewing reasonably available federal and state environmental regulatory records, site reconnaissance, interviews, reviewing and evaluating reasonably available historical maps and data regarding the Subject

Property and immediate vicinity, and preparing a Phase I ESA report.

2.7 Limitations and Exceptions of the Assessment

This report was prepared solely for the User in accordance with the agreed upon scope of services. The conclusions provided in this report are based only on the information contained in this document. Additional information with respect to this site or nearby sites, which was not available at the time this assessment was prepared, could modify the conclusions stated herein. This report has been prepared in accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527-13; no other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of the agreement between the User and Timmons Group, as discussed below.

Timmons Group was retained to complete a Phase I ESA to evaluate the presence of RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern either on-site or on the adjoining properties that could affect the environmental integrity of the Subject Property. In addition, this Phase I ESA is only valid up to 180 days prior to the date of acquisition. Estimates, plans or specifications, soil and/or groundwater testing, asbestos inspection, lead-based paint inspection, geotechnical or remedial recommendations or activities other than described herein were not included under the applied scope of services.

2.8 Special Terms and Conditions

No special terms or conditions applied to the completion of this Phase I ESA.

2.9 Methodology Used

This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-13. Timmons Group reviewed reasonably available federal and state environmental regulatory records, historical maps, and data regarding the Subject Property and immediate vicinity. The User (i.e., the party for whom the Phase I ESA was prepared), current landowner and government officials were contacted, as necessary, to obtain additional information pertaining to the Subject Property. Cole Farnsworth of Timmons Group conducted site reconnaissance on January 19, 2021, to determine if any RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern were present on the Subject Property.

2.10 User Reliance

This Phase I ESA (the “Report”) was prepared exclusively for the User, their affiliated entities, successors and/or assigns, and reliance is accordingly extended to designated third parties. All limitations and conditions associated with the Report therefore remain in effect and transfer along with this authorization of reliance. Reliance is subject to the scope of work and the terms and conditions under which the Report was prepared for the User.

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

In order to qualify for LLPs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the User or the User’s chosen representative must complete the ASTM Standard E 1527-13 User Questionnaire. Failure to provide this information could result in the determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete and, therefore, the forfeiture of CERCLA protection. Derek Stamey of Goochland County completed the ASTM Standard E 1527-13 User Questionnaire (Appendix 3), and the information recited thereto is incorporated herein by reference. This questionnaire satisfies the requirement for User-provided information.

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW

4.1 Physical Setting

4.1.1 Regional Geology

The Subject Property is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province which is underlain by crystalline bedrock formations that exhibit a high degree of geologic complexity. In addition, the region is characterized by the bedrock being overlain by a mantle of residual soil and saprolite. Saprolite is the product of in-situ chemical weathering of the crystalline bedrock that often retains the fabric, texture and structure of the parent rock and is typically thickest on hilltops and in stream valleys and thinnest or absent altogether on hillsides (Legrand, 1988). Saprolite also serves as a hydrostatic unit from which groundwater can: 1) be withdrawn directly or 2) serve as a source of recharge for underlying fractured bedrock aquifer systems.

With reference to the above, the 1993 Geologic Map of Virginia identifies the Subject Property as being underlain by the Newark Supergroup formation (map label TRss) which is defined as: sandstone - very fine-to coarse-grained, reddish-brown to gray, micaceous, minor conglomerate beds. Siltstone - reddish-brown to gray, micaceous. Shale - reddish-brown, greenish-gray, gray, yellowish-brown, laminated, fossiliferous.

Upward-fining sequences, discontinuous vertically and horizontally.

4.1.2 Hydrogeology

The 2019 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hylas, Virginia 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map was reviewed to extrapolate groundwater characteristics in the area of the Subject Property. Based on topographic expressions, groundwater in the unconfined water table aquifer is generally expected to flow to the east towards a tributary of Broad Branch (Appendix 1).

4.1.3 Topography

According to the 2019 USGS Hylas, Virginia 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map and visual observations, the topography on the Subject Property slopes downgradient to the east with average elevations from approximately 250 to 180 feet above mean sea level (Appendix 1).

4.1.4 Soils

The U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service was utilized to detail the underlying soil unit’s hydrologic nature (Appendix 1). The underlying soils of the Site are classified solely as non-hydric.

4.1.5 Floodplain

The Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) was utilized to determine if the Subject Property is located within a floodplain. According to the NFHL, the Subject Property is located in Zone X which is an area of minimal flood hazard (Appendix 1).

4.1.6 Wetlands

The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) dataset was reviewed to identify areas of potential wetlands. The NWI depicts a stream channel along the eastern boundary of the Site (Appendix 1).

4.2 Regulatory Database Review

Timmons Group retained Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) to complete a computer regulatory database search to identify contemporary and/or past uses of the Subject Property and surrounding properties that may currently present a material threat of a release, or have contributed to a release, of hazardous materials and petroleum products, with the potential to impact the Subject Property or that may have already impacted the Site (Appendix 4). Timmons Group reviewed the ASTM listed databases, at the specified search radii as detailed by the following table, in addition to proprietary databases provided by ERIS.

Federal Databases Search Radius Government

Publication Date* NPL (National Priority List) 1 mile 09/22/2020

SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) 0.5 mile 10/28/2020

SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.5 mile 10/28/2020

RCRA CORRACTS (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

– Corrective Action Report)

1 mile 10/19/2020

RCRA-TSD (RCRA – Treatment, Storage and Disposal) 0.5 mile 10/19/2020

RCRA-LQG (RCRA – Large Quantity Generators) 0.25 mile 10/19/2020

RCRA-SQG (RCRA – Small Quantity Generators) 0.25 mile 10/19/2020

RCRA-CESQG (RCRA – Certified Exempt Small Quantity Generators)

0.25 mile 10/19/2020

Federal Engineering Controls 0.5 mile 08/26/2020

Federal Institutional Controls 0.5 mile 08/26/2020

ERNS (Emergency Response Notification System) Subject Property Only 11/09/2020

State Databases Search Radius Government

Publication Date* SWF/LF (Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills) 0.5 mile 07/06/2020

LST (Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks) 0.5 mile 09/28/2020

UST (Underground Storage Tanks) 0.25 mile 09/28/2020

AST (Aboveground Storage Tanks) 0.25 mile 09/28/2020

VRP (Voluntary Remediation Program) 0.5 mile 09/16/2020 Notes: 1. Government Publication Date* = Per Appendix: Database Descriptions of the ERIS Database Report, the extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available at the time of update per ASTM standards (ASTM Standard E 1527-13/2247-16, Section 8.1.8).

2. The UST and AST databases were reviewed beyond the ASTM standards to include properties within 0.25 mile.

4.2.1 Federal Database Review

According to the ERIS regulatory database report, the Subject Property and adjoining properties are not listed on any of the reviewed federal databases (Appendix 4).

4.2.2 State Database Review

According to the ERIS regulatory database report, the Subject Property is not identified on any of the reviewed state databases (Appendix 4). However, one AST listing is identified within the specified search radius of the Site. Following review and based on regulatory status, extrapolated groundwater flow, and operation condition, the identified listing does not to represent a REC.

4.2.3 Supplementary Database Review

According to the ERIS regulatory database report, the Subject Property and adjoining properties are not identified on the reviewed supplementary environmental databases (Appendix 4).

4.2.4 Unplottable Summary

Unplottable sites are properties with inadequate address information that cannot be mapped correctly. The ERIS regulatory database report identifies six unplottable sites within the vicinity of the Subject Property (Appendix 4). Following review, the identified properties do not represent RECs based on regulatory status and/or distance.

4.3 Historical Use Information

4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs

Historical aerial photographs of various years from 1959 to 2018 were obtained from ERIS for review, with Google Earth historical imagery also being utilized for further analysis (Appendix 5). Over time, the Site has been forested. Historically, the adjoining properties consist mainly of forested, agricultural, and undeveloped land with increasing residential development in recent years and a golf course to the southwest appearing in 2003.

4.3.2 Historical Directories

ERIS conducted a historical directory search of the Site and surrounding area for various years from 1964 to 2018 (Appendix 6). The Site is not identified. Only a few adjoining properties are identified as a golf course and private residences.

4.3.3 Historical Topographic Maps

Historical topographic maps of various years from 1943 to 2016 were obtained through ERIS for review (Appendix 7). Historically, the Site has been undeveloped and forested. Over time, the adjoining properties consist mainly of forested and undeveloped land with increasing residential development and a golf course in recent years.

4.3.4 Fire Insurance Maps

According to ERIS, fire insurance maps were not available for the Subject Property and immediate vicinity (Appendix 8).

4.3.5 Environmental Lien Search

According to ERIS, no environmental liens or activity and use limitations are listed for the Site (Appendix 9).

4.3.6 Previous Reports

Timmons Group was not provided with nor has knowledge of any previous environmental reports completed for the Subject Property.

5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

Cole Farnsworth of Timmons Group completed site reconnaissance on January 19, 2021, which included walking the site perimeter and transects across the Subject Property to visually observe existing conditions and identify RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern. Photographs documenting the site reconnaissance are included as Appendix 10.

5.1 Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products

No hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed on the Subject Property.

5.2 Storage Tanks

No storage tanks were observed on the Site.

5.3 Vapor Migration

In accordance with ASTM Standard E 2600-15, as referenced by ASTM Standard E 1527-13, evidence of or potential sources of subsurface vapors were not identified for the Subject Property.

5.4 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

No systems potentially containing PCBs were observed on the Site.

5.5 Heating and Cooling

No heating or cooling systems were observed on the Subject Property.

5.6 Stained Soil/Pavement and/or Stressed Vegetation

No stained soil/pavement and/or stressed vegetation were observed on the Site.

5.7 Pits, Ponds and/or Lagoons/Pools of Liquids

No pits, ponds, and/or lagoons/pools of liquids were observed on the Subject Property.

5.8 Odors

Strong, pungent, or noxious odors were not detected on the Site.

5.9 Drains and/or Sumps

No drains or sumps were observed on the Subject Property.

5.10 Railroad Tracks

Railroad tracks were not observed on the Site.

5.11 Wells

No potable, groundwater monitoring and/or irrigation wells were observed on the Site.

5.12 Discarded and Solid Waste Materials

No discarded solid waste materials were observed on the Subject Property.

5.13 Adjoining Properties

As a result of site reconnaissance and information gained from the ERIS regulatory database search, the following observations were made for the adjoining properties:

Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products No evidence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products was observed on the adjoining properties.

Storage Tanks No storage tanks were observed on the adjoining properties.

Vapor Migration In accordance with ASTM Standard E 2600-15, as referenced by ASTM Standard E 1527-13, potential sources of vapor migration are not suspected of originating from the adjoining properties.

Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Pole-mounted transformers are located along the peripheral roadways and properties. Through previous consultation, all transformers maintained by Dominion Power have been retrofitted with non-PCB dielectric fluid. Given the area of potential effect from inadvertent failure, the transformers do not represent RECs.

Heating and Cooling The surrounding properties utilize electrically or natural gas-powered heating and cooling systems, which do not represent RECs.

Stained Soil/Pavement and/or Stressed Vegetation No evidence of stained soil/pavement and/or stressed vegetation was observed on the adjoining properties.

Pits, Ponds and/or Lagoons/Pools of Liquid No pits, ponds, or lagoons/pools of liquid were observed on the adjoining properties.

Odors No odors were found to be emanating from the adjoining properties.

Drains and/or Sumps No drains or sumps were observed on the adjoining properties.

Railroad Tracks Railroad tracks were not observed on the adjoining properties.

Wells No potable, groundwater monitoring and/or irrigation wells were observed on the adjoining properties.

Discarded and Solid Waste Materials Minimal volumes of miscellaneous solid waste materials are present on the adjoining properties which primarily consist of an empty storage tank, bottles, cans, paper goods, and Styrofoam. Such material is considered a de minimis condition, which does not represent a potential risk to the Subject Property and is not considered a REC.

6.0 INTERVIEWS

The ASTM Standard E 1527-13 Property Owner Questionnaire was completed by Derek Stamey on behalf of the current property owner. The questionnaire did not provide any new information that compromises the environmental integrity of the Site (Appendix 3).

Chase Farnsworth IV of Timmons Group attempted to contact the Goochland County Fire Department, via email on January 14, 2021, to request County records and obtain emergency response information on any RECs in connection with the Subject Property. Goochland County Fire Marshal, Doug Davies, responded to the request and noted that the County had no records of responses to the Subject Property for hazardous materials.

7.0 EVALUATION

7.1 Findings

We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 of approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia, the Subject Property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs for the Subject Property or adjoining properties.

7.2 Data Gaps

No significant data gaps were encountered during the completion of this Phase I ESA.

7.3 Opinions for Additional Investigation

Following a review of reasonably accessible federal and state environmental regulatory records and standard historical resources, in conjunction with site reconnaissance, Timmons Group recommends no further assessment to satisfy due diligence requirements as prescribed by ASTM standards.

7.4 Conclusions and Recommendations

Timmons Group completed a Phase I ESA of approximately 24.31 acres located along Hockett Road in Goochland County, Virginia. Based on the results, RECs were not identified for the Subject Property or adjoining properties as defined by ASTM Standard E 1527-13. Therefore, Timmons Group recommends no further action.

8.0 REFERENCES

ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.

Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Mines Minerals and Energy, 1993. Geologic Map of Virginia, 1:500,000 scale.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 13, 2021. City Directory. Report ID:

21011100232.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 13, 2021. Database Report. Report ID:

21011100232.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 13, 2021. Environmental Lien Search. Report ID:

21011100232.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 12, 2021. Fire Insurance Maps. Report ID:

21011100232.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 14, 2021. Historical Aerials. Report ID:

21011100232.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 11, 2021. Physical Setting Report. Report ID:

21011100232p.

Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., January 11, 2021. Topographic Maps. Report ID:

21011100232.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2021. National Flood Hazard Layer, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Goochland County, Virginia.

Legrand, H.E., 1988. Region 21, Piedmont and Blue Ridge, in Back, W., Rosenshein, J.S., and Seaber, P.R., eds., Hydrogeology: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, v. O-2.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021. National Wetlands Inventory Map: Goochland County, Virginia.

USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, 2021. Web Soil Survey 3.0, National Cooperative Soil Survey, Goochland County, Virginia.

USGS, 2019. 7.5 Minute Series Hylas, Virginia, Topographic Quadrangle Map, 1:24000 scale.

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Site Mapping and Physical Setting Report

Appendix 2 Property Information

Appendix 3 Interviews

Appendix 4 Regulatory Database Review

Appendix 5 Historical Aerial Photographs

Appendix 6 Historical Directories

Appendix 7 Historical Topographic Maps

Appendix 8 Fire Insurance Maps

Appendix 9 Environmental Lien Search

Appendix 10 Site Reconnaissance Photographs

Appendix 11 Environmental Professional Qualifications

APPENDIX 1

Site Mapping and Physical Setting Report

U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):

DATE(S):

WATERSHED(S):

HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):

TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:

PROJECT STUDY LIMITS:

LATITUDE:

LONGITUDE:

HOCKETT ROAD SITE

GOOCHLAND COUNTY, VIRGINIA

VICINITY MAP

41372.014

37.640878 -77.678431

24.31 ACRES

HYLAS

02080205

MIDDLE JAMES-WILLIS

These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\804\41372.014-Hockett_Road_Site\GIS\Phase I ESA\Hocket Road Site - VIC.mxd

0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200 Feet

Site limits are approximate.

Topographic imagery from USGS.

Site Limits

Tuckahoe Creek Pkwy

Tu ck ah oe

C re ek Pk w y

Tu ck ah oe

Cr ee k Pk wy

C ap ita l

O ne

D r

Tuckahoe CreekPkwy

Hockett Rd

Tuckahoe Creek Pkwy

Hamlet Rd

Tuckahoe Creek Pkwy

34B

11C2

44C2

44B2

44C2

7B

2B

8B2

8C2

34C

11B2

34B

11C2

8B

Legend

Project Limits - Approx. 24.31 Acres

National Hydrography Dataset

National Wetlands Inventory

FEMA Flood Zone

X

Hydric Soil Classification

Non-Hydric

DRAWING DESCRIPTION

PROJECT NAME & LOCATION

SHEET NUMBERSCALE

DATE

01/21/2021

DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY

PROJECT NAME

C. FARNSWORTH

HOCKETT ROAD SITE

1 " = 167 'H:

ENVIRONMENTAL

INVENTORY MAP

REVISIONS

MM/DD/YY# DESCRIPTION

These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

PROJECT NUMBER

41372.014

H O

C K

ET

T

R O

A D

S

IT

E

G O

O C

H

LA

N D

C O

U N

TY

VI

R

G

IN

IA

B ou ld er s

Pa rk w ay

, S ui te

R ic hm on d, V A

TE

L

4.

0.

w w w

.ti m m on s.

co m

PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE

0 170 340

SCALE (FEET)

Y:\804\41372.014-Hockett_Road_Site\GIS\Phase I ESA\Hocket Road Site - EIM.mxd

NOTES:

Project Limits are approximate.

NWI from US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Soils data from SSURGO.

National Hydrography Dataset from USGS.

Aerial imagery from VGIN.

Mapunit Symbol Mapunit Name 44C2 Wedowee fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 8B2 Creedmoor fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded 8C2 Creedmoor fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 11B2 Fluvanna fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded

Goochland County Soils

1 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

Property Information

Order Number: 21011100232p

Date Completed: January 11, 2021

Project Number: 41372.014

Project Property: Hockett Road Site Hockett Road Goochland VA

Coordinates:

Latitude: 37.64076534 Longitude: -77.67659508 UTM Northing: 4169328.58697 Meters UTM Easting: 263838.370702 Meters UTM Zone: UTM Zone 18S Elevation: 223.82 ft Slope Direction: SE

Topographic Information Hydrologic Information Geologic Information Soil Information Wells and Additional Sources

Summary Detail Report

Radon Information Appendix Liability Notice

The ERIS Physical Setting Report - PSR provides comprehensive information about the physical setting around a site and includes a complete overview of topography and surface topology, in addition to hydrologic, geologic and soil characteristics. The location and detailed attributes of oil and gas wells, water wells, public water systems and radon are also included for review.

The compilation of both physical characteristics of a site and additional attribute data is useful in assessing the impact of migration of contaminants and subsequent impact on soils and groundwater.

Disclaimer

This Report does not provide a full environmental evaluation for the site or adjacent properties. Please see the terms and disclaimer at the end of the Report for greater detail.

http://www.erisinfo.com

Topographic Information

Topographic Information

3 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

The previous topographic map(s) are created by seamlessly merging and cutting current USGS topographic data. Below are shaded relief map(s), derived from USGS elevation data to show surrounding topography in further detail.

Topographic information at project property:

Elevation: 223.82 ft Slope Direction: SE

Hydrologic Information

6 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

The Wetland Type map shows wetland existence overlaid on an aerial imagery. The Flood Hazard Zones map shows FEMA flood hazard zones overlaid on an aerial imagery. Relevant FIRM panels and detailed zone information is provided below.

Available FIRM Panels in area: 51087C0020C(effective:2007-12-18) 51041C0025D(effective:2012-12-18) 51085C0275B(effective:2008-12-02) 51075C0250B(effective:2008-12-02) 51075C0245B(effective:2008-12-02) 51075C0310B(effective:2008-12-02) 51145C0160B(effective:2008-02-06) 51085C0275B(effective:2008-12-02) 51145C0160B(effective:2008-02-06) 51075C0250B(effective:2008-12-02) 51075C0245B(effective:2008-12-02) 51075C0310B(effective:2008-12-02) 51087C0085C(effective:2007-12-18) 51087C0025C(effective:2007-12-18)

Flood Zone A-01

Zone: A

Zone subtype:

Flood Zone AE-01

Zone: AE

Zone subtype:

Flood Zone X-01

Zone: X

Zone subtype: 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD

Flood Zone X-12

Zone: X

Zone subtype: AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD

Geologic Information

Geologic Information

8 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

The previous page shows USGS geology information. Detailed information about each unit is provided below.

Geologic Unit my

Unit Name: Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks

Unit Age: Proterozoic - Paleozoic ?

Primary Rock Type: mylonite

Secondary Rock Type: gneiss

Unit Description: Mylonite, mylonite gneiss, and cataclastic rocks.

Geologic Unit TRbr

Unit Name: Newark Supergroup; Breccia, mixed clasts

Unit Age: Upper Triassic

Primary Rock Type: breccia

Secondary Rock Type:

Unit Description: Breccia, mixed clasts

Geologic Unit TRss

Unit Name: Newark Supergroup; Triassic Sandstone, Siltstone, and Shale

Unit Age: Upper Triassic

Primary Rock Type: sandstone

Secondary Rock Type: siltstone

Unit Description: Interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale

Geologic Unit my

Unit Name: Mylonite, Mylonite Gneiss, and Cataclastic Rocks

Unit Age: Proterozoic - Paleozoic ?

Primary Rock Type: mylonite

Secondary Rock Type: gneiss

Unit Description: Mylonite, mylonite gneiss, and cataclastic rocks.

Soil Information

10 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

The previous page shows a soil map using SSURGO data from USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Detailed information about each unit is provided below.

Map Unit 11B2 (7.86%)

Map Unit Name: Fluvanna fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: 121cm

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted.

Major components are printed below

Fluvanna(80%) horizon H1(0cm to 28cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(28cm to 114cm) Clay horizon H3(114cm to 213cm) Silty clay loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 11B2 - Fluvanna fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Fluvanna (80%) The Fluvanna component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of Mixed mafic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 48 inches during January, February, March, April, May, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Component: Forestdale (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Forestdale soil is a minor component.

Map Unit 11C2 (4.18%)

Map Unit Name: Fluvanna fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: 121cm

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted.

Major components are printed below

Fluvanna(80%) horizon H1(0cm to 28cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(28cm to 114cm) Clay horizon H3(114cm to 213cm) Silty clay loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 11C2 - Fluvanna fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Fluvanna (80%) The Fluvanna component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on

11 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p piedmonts. The parent material consists of Mixed mafic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 48 inches during January, February, March, April, May, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 12 (0.84%)

Map Unit Name: Forestdale fine sandy loam

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: 15cm

Drainage Class - Dominant: Poorly drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted.

Major components are printed below

Forestdale(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 13cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(13cm to 89cm) Clay horizon H3(89cm to 178cm) Sandy loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 12 - Forestdale fine sandy loam

Component: Forestdale (85%) The Forestdale component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains on piedmonts. The parent material consists of alluvium. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is high. This soil is frequently flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 6 inches during January, February, March. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 5w. This soil meets hydric criteria.

Map Unit 14B2 (0.59%)

Map Unit Name: Georgeville fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Georgeville(80%) horizon H1(0cm to 10cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(10cm to 41cm) Clay horizon H3(41cm to 132cm) Clay horizon H4(132cm to 244cm) Silt loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 14B2 - Georgeville fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Georgeville (80%) The Georgeville component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches.

12 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p

The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 14C2 (0.29%)

Map Unit Name: Georgeville fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Georgeville(80%) horizon H1(0cm to 10cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(10cm to 41cm) Clay horizon H3(41cm to 132cm) Clay horizon H4(132cm to 244cm) Silt loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 14C2 - Georgeville fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Georgeville (80%) The Georgeville component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches.

The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 22B (0.2%)

Map Unit Name: Mayodan fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Mayodan(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(18cm to 45cm) Clay loam horizon H3(45cm to 114cm) Clay horizon H4(114cm to 160cm) Loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 22B - Mayodan fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes

Component: Mayodan (85%) The Mayodan component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of Triassic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural

13 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 22C2 (0.3%)

Map Unit Name: Mayodan fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Mayodan(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(18cm to 45cm) Clay loam horizon H3(45cm to 114cm) Clay horizon H4(114cm to 160cm) Loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 22C2 - Mayodan fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Mayodan (85%) The Mayodan component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of Triassic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 24 (36.95%)

Map Unit Name: Monacan complex

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: 23cm

Drainage Class - Dominant: Somewhat poorly drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained.

Major components are printed below

Monacan(60%) horizon H1(0cm to 30cm) Silt loam horizon H2(30cm to 107cm) Silt loam horizon H3(107cm to 160cm) Clay

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 24 - Monacan complex

Component: Monacan (60%) The Monacan component makes up 60 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains on piedmonts. The parent material consists of alluvium. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60

14 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is frequently flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 9 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 28C3 (0.64%)

Map Unit Name: Pacolet clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Pacolet(80%) horizon H1(0cm to 10cm) Clay loam horizon H2(10cm to 68cm) Clay horizon H3(68cm to 107cm) Clay loam horizon H4(107cm to 157cm) Loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 28C3 - Pacolet clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded

Component: Pacolet (80%) The Pacolet component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded.

There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent.

Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Map Unit 2B (0.25%)

Map Unit Name: Appling fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes

Bedrock Depth - Min: null

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Appling(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(23cm to 122cm) Clay horizon H3(122cm to 160cm) Sandy clay loam

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 2B - Appling fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes

Component: Appling (85%) The Appling component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on interfluves on uplands.

The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no

15 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21011100232p zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.

Component: Worsham (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Worsham soil is a minor component.

Map Unit 31C2 (3.03%)

Map Unit Name: Pinkston fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Bedrock Depth - Min: 89cm

Watertable Depth - Annual Min: null

Drainage Class - Dominant: Well drained

Hydrologic Group - Dominant: B - Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.

Major components are printed below

Pinkston(85%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm) Fine sandy loam horizon H2(18cm to 43cm) Loam horizon H3(43cm to 89cm) Sandy loam horizon H4(89cm to 114cm) Bedrock

Component Description:

Minor map unit components are excluded from this report.

Map Unit: 31C2 - Pinkston fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded

Component: Pinkston (85%) The Pinkston component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on piedmonts. The parent material consists of Triassic residuum. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent.