ATTACHMENT_G1_SECURITY_GUARD_RFP_PERFORMACE_METRICS.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Security Guard Services
Solicitation number
FY26-ITB-063
Issued by
Santa Fe County, New Mexico

About this file

This is an Attachment G performance metrics template document for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of Santa Fe, New Mexico for Security Guard Services at the Buckman Direct Diversion facility. The document serves as a standardized form for offerors to submit their project performance metrics demonstrating qualifications to provide armed and unarmed security guard services. Offerors are required to complete a performance metrics table with their actual experience data, reference each metric to supporting documentation listed in Attachment H, and provide a narrative explanation of how their capabilities and track record align with or exceed the City's sample benchmarks. The one-page submission must not include identifying information and should address any significant differences from the City's anticipated performance levels while highlighting unique strengths and advantages.

The City of Santa Fe has established the following performance benchmarks for evaluation: three to five years in business providing security services, 50,000 or more annual security guard labor hours, three to five comparable public-sector contracts, emergency response time of less than 30 minutes, guard fill rate exceeding 95 percent, zero percent average cost deviation based on quotes and invoices, and a 9 out of 10 average customer satisfaction rate. The template also includes a metric for guard turnover rate, though no specific benchmark is provided for this criterion. Offerors are permitted to add additional performance metrics that differentiate their qualifications beyond the standard requirements, and all reported metrics must be supported by references that will be verified by the City's selection committee during the evaluation process.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Security_Guard_Services_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
24-0343_Aarowhead_Securtity_dba_VetSec_Protection_Agency_CURRENT_CONTRACT.pdf PDF
Security_Guard_Services.pdf PDF
Security_Guard_Services.pdf PDF
Security_Guard_Services.pdf PDF
Security_Guard_GSA_-_CLEAN_02-12-2026_dg.docx DOCX document
Security_Guard_GSA_-_CLEAN_02-12-2026_dg.docx DOCX document
Security_Guard_GSA_-_CLEAN_02-12-2026_dg.docx DOCX document
Security_Guard_GSA_-_CLEAN_02-12-2026_dg.docx DOCX document
TRAVIS_SERVICE_DETERMINATION_RE__Request_for_Service_Determination_-_BDD_Security_Services_12.16.25.pdf PDF
TRAVIS_SERVICE_DETERMINATION_RE__Request_for_Service_Determination_-_BDD_Security_Services_12.16.25.pdf PDF
TRAVIS_SERVICE_DETERMINATION_RE__Request_for_Service_Determination_-_BDD_Security_Services_12.16.25.pdf PDF
TRAVIS_SERVICE_DETERMINATION_RE__Request_for_Service_Determination_-_BDD_Security_Services_12.16.25.pdf PDF
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25.pdf PDF
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_G1_SECURITY_GUARD_RFP_PERFORMACE_METRICS.docx DOCX document
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25.pdf PDF
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25_(1).pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_G1_SECURITY_GUARD_RFP_PERFORMACE_METRICS.docx DOCX document
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25_(1).pdf PDF
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25_(1).pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_G1_SECURITY_GUARD_RFP_PERFORMACE_METRICS.docx DOCX document
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25.pdf PDF
HORIZONS_DECLINATION_Re__Request_for_Security_Guard_Services_-_BDD_12.9.25_(1).pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT G (1) – SCOPE/LEVEL OF EXPERTISE PLAN (SC/LE)

Instructions:

· Offerors should use this template to provide their project performance metrics for each requirement.

· Each reported metric should be supported by a reference listed in Attachment H: Reference List, with the corresponding reference number indicated in the "Ref #" column.

· Offerors may add additional performance metrics that differentiate their qualifications.

· Offerors should NOT modify the prefilled sample data or exceed the 1-page limit for this section.

· Offerors should NOT include any identifying information in this submission.

The City of Santa Fe Sample column provides reference figures based on anticipated project needs. Offerors should enter their actual experience metrics in the Offeror’s Project Performance column.

Scope Description: Comment by josephkashiwagi@ksm-inc.com: If scope is needed In addition to completing the table below, offerors should provide a narrative explaining their proposed performance metrics. This narrative should describe how their capabilities and proven track record—which the City will verify through references—align with or exceed the City's sample benchmarks. Offerors should justify any significant differences, highlight unique strengths or advantages, and provide a high-level summary of their proposal to ensure the selection committee can quickly grasp the key aspects of their approach and qualifications.

*Note: the instructions above may be deleted from this form to allow for more room to respond.

Performance Metrics

Requirement
City of Santa Fe Sample
Offeror’s Project Performance
Ref #
# Of years in business providing security services
3 - 5
[Enter value]
[#]
Total security guard labor hours provided annually
50,000+
[Enter value]
[#]
Number of comparable public-sector contracts
3 - 5
[Enter value]
[#]
Average emergency response time (hours)
< 30 Minutes
[Enter value]
[#]
Guard fill rate (shifts filled as scheduled)
>95%
[Enter value]
[#]
Average Cost Deviation (%) Quotes and Invoices
0%
[Enter value]
[#]
Average customer satisfaction rate
9/10
[Enter value]
[#]
Guard turnover rate
<25%
[Enter value]
[#]
Compliance rate with post orders & SOPs
100%
[Enter value]
[#]

Additional Project Performance Metrics (Optional) Offerors may provide additional performance metrics that highlight their expertise. Each metric should be supported by a professional reference in Attachment H.

Additional Criteria
Offeror’s Project Performance
Ref #
[Enter additional metric]
[Enter value]
[#]
[Enter additional metric]
[Enter value]
[#]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .