ATTACHMENT G - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
6515--NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C10G24R0028
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Headquarters

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to purchase a Draeger brand name or equal Surgical Lighting System. The Questionnaire requests information from references on the offeror's past performance in areas such as quality of service, cost control, timeliness, and business relations. The associated federal contract opportunity is a combined synopsis/solicitation for the Draeger brand name or equal Surgical Lighting System, with a base period of 12 months and four 12-month option periods. The solicitation lists detailed salient characteristics and technical requirements for the lighting system, including features such as adjustable light field, LED lamp life, color rendering index, and sterile hand controls. Proposals are due by 11:59 PM EST on April 22, 2024, and the VA will evaluate offers based on the criteria outlined in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 6515--NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C10G24R0028 0001.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT E - REPORTING TOOL - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT F - PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT C - CONTRACT CLAUSES - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.docx DOCX document
36C10G24R0028.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT D - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT A - PRICE COST SCHEDULE - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT B - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION - NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

36C10G24R0028

Attachment G Past Performance Questionnaire

SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G24R0028

DESCRIPTION: NX EQ SURGICAL LIGHTING SYSTEM – Draeger Brand Name or Equal

Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)

STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO: Valerie Bennett E-MAIL: Valerie.Bennett1@va.gov

VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:

Offeror Name:

(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)

Contract Number:
(Insert Applicable Contract Number Here)

Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.

Please E-mail Questionnaire to Valerie.Bennett1@va.gov by April 22, 2024, at 11:59 PM EST.

Name of Reference:
(Reference Complete These Sections)

Title of Reference:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Name of Organization:

Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):

Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):

Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?

Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:

Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?

Rating Guidelines:

Rating
Quality of Service
Cost Control
Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations
1: Unsatisfactory
Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives
Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively
Offeror delays have jeopardized performance
Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective
2: Satisfactory
Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified
Offeror is usually effective in managing costs
Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective
3: Excellent
Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services
Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices
Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines

Offeror Evaluation:

Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above)
Category
Description
Quality of Service
In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence:

Comment from Reference: _______________________

Cost Control
Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation:
Timeliness of Performance
Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule:
Business Relations
Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems:
|_| YES |_| NO
Overall Satisfaction
Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .