Attachment F RangerDwelling.RptC Asbestos.pdf

P.O. Box 22038, Little Rock, Arkansas 72221 Phone (501) 227-8900 FAX: (501) 227-7535

Safety & Environmental

Investigations, Inc.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT

Ranger Dwelling US Forest Service

1406 Highway 270 East Mount Ida, Arkansas

June 2023

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT

Ranger Dwelling

1409 Highway 270 East

June 2023

Prepared For: William McFadden

100 Reserve Street Hot Springs, Arkansas 71902

Prepared By: Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc.

PO Box 22038 Little Rock, Arkansas 72221

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 3 1406 Hwy 270 E Mount Ida, Arkansas

Asbestos Inspection Report Ranger Dwelling

1409 Highway 270 East

Safety & Environmental Investigations, (SEI) Inc. was retained by the US Forest Service, Ouachita National Forest, SO of Hot Springs, Arkansas to perform the pre-renovation asbestos inspection of the structure located at 1406 Highway 270 East in Mount Ida, referred to as the Ranger Dwelling. On June 16th, 2023, Mr. Robert Roberson (Certification #011542) and Mr. Josh Roberson (Certification #015183) of SEI, Inc.

(License #000260) performed the on-site inspection and sampling of the structure for the presence of suspect asbestos-containing materials. The inspection was performed following EPA AHERA guidelines (40 CFR 763) and NESHAP (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) and the Arkansas Department of Entergy and Environment, DEQ, Regulation 21. The inspection included all accessible portions of the structure.

Background

The Ranger Dwelling consists of a vacant residential dwelling of approximately 1,468 square feet on the main floor, approximately 308 square feet of finished basement space, and approximately 576 square feet of a finished 2nd floor living space. The structure is constructed of wood framing with a pitched, shingled roofing system set on a pier and beam foundation. The structure has been utilized as a residential dwelling, although it was vacant at the time of the inspection. The structure and finishes were in relatively good condition with the exception of the ceiling material in the main floor bedrooms which were damaged by a water leak (significant damage – poor condition.)

The interior finishes of the structures included 12” acoustic ceiling tiles, 1’X2’ ceiling tiles, sheetrock and panels walls, and wood, carpet and vinyl flooring. A water leak damaged the ceiling materials on the main floor, and some of the ceiling tiles had delaminated and fallen onto the floor.

The date of construction of the dwelling was listed as 1941, with various renovations since construction. The structure is scheduled for renovations to repair water damage and restore the building to a rentable residential structure.

A detached garage was located on the property, and was not part of the scope of this project.

Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study was to identify and collect samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials from the specified units for laboratory analysis. At the client’s request, an inspection for the presence of suspect asbestos-containing materials was performed of the units specified in this report. Identified asbestos-containing materials have been quantified.

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 4 1406 Hwy 270 E

Sampling was performed in accordance with guidelines published in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 40 CFR Part 763. Suspect asbestos-containing materials were divided into three different categories: surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials. Each category of materials was divided into homogeneous areas, which are defined as materials similar in appearance, color, texture, and installation date. Samples were collected from each homogeneous area according to the following scale:

Surfacing Materials: <1000 sq. ft. 3 Samples

1,000 – 5,000 sq. ft. 5 Samples >5,000 sq. ft. 7 Samples Thermal System Insulation any amount 3 Samples Minimum Miscellaneous Materials any amount 2 Samples Minimum

The Environmental Protection Agency defines an asbestos-containing material as any material which contains greater than one percent (1%) asbestos by weight. The entire homogeneous area is classified as asbestos-containing if any one (1) of the samples collected from that area is found to contain more than 1% asbestos. All samples collected from a homogeneous material must reveal a result of one (1) percent asbestos or less for a material to be considered non-asbestos containing.

The condition of suspect homogeneous areas was assessed to determine if the materials were friable (RACM) or non-friable. Friable materials (RACM) are materials that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Non-Friable materials are materials that cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Non-Friable materials are divided into two categories, Category I Non-Friable materials, (asbestos-containing packing, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products that contain >1% asbestos), and Category II Non-Friable materials (any material, excluding category I non-friable ACM, containing >1% asbestos that cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure).

Asbestos samples were analyzed via Polarized Light Microscopy utilizing EPA Method 600/R-93/116 by Crisp Analytical, LLC in Carrollton, Texas. CA Labs is accredited by the National Institute for Standards and Testing, National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Analysis (NVLAP Air and Bulk #200349-0). It should be noted EPA NESHAPS recommends point-counting of positive asbestos results revealing less than 10% asbestos content by visual estimation.

Findings

The following table provides a summary of the suspect asbestos-containing materials sampled from the units, along with the analytical results and locations of the materials.

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 5 1406 Hwy 270 E Mount Ida, Arkansas

Table I – Asbestos Sample Summary Ranger Dwelling

1406 Highway 270 East Mount Ida, Arkansas

HA# Sample No. Description Analysis Result

%/Type ACM Sample

Location

L01 01 Linoleum–Kitchen/Bathroom None Detected Kitchen 02 Linoleum–Kitchen/Bathroom 20% Chrysotile Kitchen

CT01 03 12” Celotex Ceiling Tile–T/O None Detected Kitchen 04 12” Celotex Ceiling Tile–T/O None Detected 2nd Floor

CT02 05 1’X2’ Ceiling Tile-T/O None Detected Dining Rm 06 1’X2’ Ceiling Tile-T/O None Detected Living Rm

CT03

07 12” Celotex Dimpled Ceiling

Tile - Throughout None Detected Bathroom

08 12” Celotex Dimpled Ceiling Tile - Throughout None Detected Bedroom

SR01

09 Sheetrock and Mud-Stairwell and Adj. Bedroom None Detected Stairwell

10 Sheetrock and Mud-Stairwell and Adj. Bedroom Stairwell

11 Sheetrock and Mud-Stairwell and Adj. Bedroom None Detected Adjacent

Bedroom

L02 12 Linoleum – 2nd Flr Bath 17% Chrysotile 2nd Flr Bath 13 Linoleum – 2nd Flr Bath NAPP 2nd Flr Bath

RS01 14 Roofing Shingles None Detected Back Roof 15 Roofing Shingles None Detected Front Roof

T01 NS Transite Flue Pipe @ Basement Stairwell Assumed ACM Basement

PT01 16 Textured Paint/Basement None Detected Basement 17 Textured Paint/Basement None Detected Basement

CM01 18 Carpet Mastic/Porch None Detected Porch 19 Carpet Mastic/Porch None Detected Porch

T/O: Various locations throughout NAPP: Not Analyzed – previous HA sample positive NS: Material not sampled, Assume ACM

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc. has received the analytical results from the samples collected from the Ranger Dwelling in Mount Ida, Arkansas. The analysis revealed >1% asbestos was detected in the Linoleum in the Kitchen and the 2nd Floor Bathroom.

Table II below summarizes the location of the identified ACM.

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 6 1406 Hwy 270 E Mount Ida, Arkansas

Table II – Positive Asbestos-Containing Homogeneous Areas

HA# Material Description / Location Type ACM Condition Quantity

L01 Linoleum Flooring located in the Kitchen and Bathroom on the first floor

Category I Non-Friable

Damaged – Bathroom 180 sf

L02 Linoleum Flooring in the 2nd Floor Bathroom

Category I Non-Friable Good 30 sf

T01 Transite Flue Piping from the basement stairwell through the roof of the structure

Category II Non-Friable Good 25 lf

Discussion

SEI, Inc. has received the analytical results from the samples collected during this investigation. The results revealed the following materials were identified as Asbestos- Containing Materials (>1% Asbestos Content):

Homogeneous Area L01: This ACM linoleum flooring was located in the Kitchen and Bathroom on the first floor of the structure, with at least two layers of flooring in the areas. This ACM layer was identified as the top layer of linoleum, and is considered a Category I, Non-Friable Asbestos-containing Material in good condition, with slight damage noted in the bathroom. The removal of the material would be considered a Class II Asbestos Removal Operations under OSHA, and may be an EPA - Regulated Asbestos-containing Material when removed if the material is not removed substantially intact. The inspectors identified approximately 180 square feet of this material in the kitchen and bathroom on the first floor.

Homogeneous Area L02: This ACM linoleum flooring was located in the bathroom on the 2nd floor of the structure. This ACM linoleum is considered a Category I, Non-Friable Asbestos-containing Material in good condition. The removal of the material would be considered a Class II Asbestos Removal Operations under OSHA, and may be an EPA - Regulated Asbestos-containing Material when removed if the material is not removed substantially intact. The inspectors identified approximately 30 square feet of this material in the bathroom on the second floor.

Homogeneous Area T01: This Transite Flue Piping was identified in the stairwell to the basement off the kitchen, and is assumed to penetrate through the ceiling into the attic and through the roof of the structure. This ACM material is considered a Category II Non-friable ACM in good condition. The removal of this material would be considered a Class II Asbestos Removal Operation. The inspectors identified approximately 25 linear feet of this material from the basement through the roof to vent outside the structure.

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 7 1406 Hwy 270 E Mount Ida, Arkansas

The Arkansas Department of Entergy and Environment (ADEE), Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Regulation 21 requires all ACM (Asbestos-Containing Material) which are, or may become friable (RACM) be removed prior to renovation/demolition which will disturb these materials. Demolition, renovations, or response actions, involving RACM, and which are not Small-Scale-Short-Duration (SSSD) (3-square / 3-linear feet) or a minor fiber release episode shall be performed by an Arkansas-Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor.

A 10-Day Notice of Intent (NOI) is also required to be filed with the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) for any demolition or the removal of RACM exceeding 160 square or 260 linear feet. Exemptions in the standard do apply to residential dwellings. However, the ownership of this structure places the building in a category which is not exempt, and thus, would be considered a covered facility.

Materials not sampled, and identified as non-suspect for Asbestos during the investigation included fiberglass duct and pipe insulation, fiberglass batt insulation, rubber pipe insulation, and mineral wool ceiling insulation.

Limitations

This report relates to the structure referred to as the Ranger’s Dwelling located at 1406 Highway 270 East in Mount Ida, Arkansas. According to the client, the structure is scheduled for future renovations. The inspection included as interior and exterior accessible building components.

Asbestos samples were collected from materials identified as Homogeneous Materials based upon visual inspection of the site. SEI, Inc. is not responsible for assumptions on homogeneity which prove to be incorrect. In addition, samples collected represent only that portion of the entire homogeneous material. SEI, Inc. is not responsible for materials not identified and sampled due to the restraints on accessibility of the material. No warranties, expressed or implied, relate to the previous and/or future conditions.

During any operations involving renovation or demolition, suspect asbestos materials may be encountered which were not identified in this inspection. Work should immediately cease, and a certified inspector contacted for further sampling to identify those additional materials.

Ranger Dwelling SEI Job # 23093 Page 8 1406 Hwy 270 E Mount Ida, Arkansas

Asbestos Analysis was performed by Crisp Analytical, LLC in Carrollton, Texas. CA Labs is solely responsible for all asbestos analytical results contained in and referred to in this report.

This report prepared by:

Robert W. Roberson President Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc.

APPENDICIES

FIELD LOGS

LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Attn:

Customer Project:

Reference #: Date: 06/23/23

Analysis and Method

Discussion

Qualifications

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc Robert Roberson

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406 Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

Summary of polarized light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763

Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of a stereomicroscope. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).

Vermiculite containing samples may contain trace amounts of actinolite/tremolite. When not detected by PLM, these samples should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.

Fibrous talc containing samples may contain a regulated asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.

Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be detectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.

A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.

Since allowable variation in quantification of samples close to 1% is high, <1% may be reported. Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos or "trace asbestos".

In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.

CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). CA Labs is also accredited by AIHA LAP, LLC. in the PLM asbestos field of testing for Industrial Hygiene. All analysts have completed college courses or hold a degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science). Recognition by a state professional board in one these disciplines is preferred, but not required. Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment the educational background of the analyst. The Laboratory Director and Quality Manager have received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. Analysis performed at Crisp Analytical Labs, LLC 1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929

Labs

A

C

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 1 of 8

Customer Project: 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406 Hwy 270 East CA Labs Project #: CAL23065199AS tan linoleum backing tan linoleum

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Layer # Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

List of Affected

Building Material

Types

58558 L01-02 L01-02-2 tan linoleum backing 20% Chrysotile

58568 L02-12 L02-12-1 Linoleum/ tan linoleum 17% Chrysotile

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 2 of 8

Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:

Date:

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58557 L01-01 L01-

01-1 Linoleum/ off-white linoleum y None Detected 15% ce

5% fg 80% gy,ma

58557 L01-

01-2 tan mastic y None Detected 100% gy,bi

58557 L01-

01-3 tan flooring y None Detected 100% qu,ma

58558 L01-02 4 L01-

02-1 Linoleum/ off-white linoleum

58558 L01-

02-2 tan linoleum backing y 20% Chrysotile 80% gy,ma

58558 4 L01-

02-3 tan mastic

58558 4 L01-

02-4 tan flooring

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 3 of 8

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58559 CT01-03

CT01-

03-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

58559

CT01-

03-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58560 CT01-04

CT01-

04-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

58560

CT01-

04-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58561 CT03-05

CT03-

05-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

58561

CT03-

05-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58562 CT03-06

CT03-

06-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 4 of 8

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58562

CT03-

06-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58563 CT03-07

CT03-

07-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

58563

CT03-

07-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58564 CT03-08

CT03-

08-1 Ceiling Tile/ white surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,bi

58564

CT03-

08-2 brown ceiling tile y None Detected 100% ce

58565 SR01-09

SR01-

09-1

Sheetrock/Mud/ off-white surfaced white compound n None Detected 100% qu,bi,ca

58565

SR01-

09-2 white compound (beneath tape) y None Detected 100% qu,ca

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 5 of 8

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58565

SR01-

09-3 white drywall with brown paper n None Detected 20% ce 80% qu,gy

58566 SR01-10

SR01-

10-1

Sheetrock/Mud/ off-white surfaced white compound n None Detected 100% qu,bi,ca

58566

SR01-

10-2 white compound (beneath tape) y None Detected 100% qu,ca

58566

SR01-

10-3 white drywall with brown paper n None Detected 20% ce 80% qu,gy

58567 SR01-11

SR01-

11-1

Sheetrock/Mud/ tan surfaced white compound n None Detected 100% qu,bi,ca

58567

SR01-

11-2 white drywall with brown paper n None Detected 20% ce 80% qu,gy

58568 L02-12 L02-

12-1 Linoleum/ tan linoleum y 17% Chrysotile 83% gy,ma

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 6 of 8

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58568 4 L02-

12-2 tan mastic

58569 L02-13 L02-

13-1 Linoleum/ tan linoleum Positive Stop

58569 4 L02-

13-2 tan mastic

58570 RS01-14

RS01-

14-1

Roof Shingles/ black roofing shingle with black gravel n None Detected 15% ce

10% fg 75% qu,bi

58570

RS01-

14-2 black felt y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu,bi

58571 RS01-15

RS01-

15-1

Roof Shingles/ black roofing shingle with gray gravel n None Detected 15% ce

10% fg 75% qu,bi

58571

RS01-

15-2 black felt y None Detected 20% ce 80% qu,bi

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 7 of 8

Phone #

Fax #

Jose Matute Senior Analyst

Analyst Julio Robles

CA Labs

Dedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to QualityDedicated to Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road

Carrollton, TX 75006

Phone 972-242-2754

Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

Phone 225-751-5632

Fax 225-751-5634

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Robert Roberson CA Labs Project #:

Safety & Environmental Investigations, Inc 23092, Ranger Dwelling, 1406

Hwy 270 East

CAL23065199AS

PO Box 22038

Little Rock, AR 72201 Turnaround Time: 6/23/2023

3 Days Samples Rec'd: 6/21/23 10:30AM

501-227-8900 Date Of Sampling: 6/16/2023

Purchase Order #:

Laboratory

Sample ID

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of

Subsample

Homo-geneo us

(Y/N)

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

58572 PT01-16

PT01-

16-1

Paint Texture/ tan textured surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,pe,ca

58573 PT01-17

PT01-

17-1

Paint Texture/ tan textured surfacing y None Detected 100% qu,pe,ca

58574 CM01-18

CM01-

18-1

Carpet Mastic/ tan wooden paneling y None Detected 100% ce

58574

CM01-

18-2 brown and tan mastic n None Detected 100% gy,bi

58575 CM01-19

CM01-

19-1

Carpet Mastic/ tan wooden paneling y None Detected 100% ce

58575

CM01-

19-2 brown and tan mastic n None Detected 100% gy,bi

Dallas NVLAP Lab Code 200349-0 TEM/PLM TCEQ# T104704513-15-3 TDH 30-0235

AIHA LAP, LLC Laboratory #102929 Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116). All samples received in good condition unless noted.

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gy - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastonite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Technical Manager

Tanner Rasmussen

Labs

A

/data/wordandspreadsheets/templates/asbestos/PLMReport.xls (Revision 4 2/25/2020) Page 8 of 8

PHOTOGRAPHS

L01 – Linoleum in the Kitchen/1st Floor Bathroom (ACM)

CT01 – 12” Celotex Ceiling Tiles (Non-ACM)

CT02 – 1’X2’ Ceiling Tiles (Non-ACM)

CT03 – 12” Dimpled Celotex Ceiling Tiles (Non-ACM)

SR01 – Sheetrock and Mud in Stairwell and Adjacent Bedroom (Non-ACM)

L02 – Linoleum in 2nd Floor Bathroom (ACM)

RS01 – Roofing Shingles (Non-ACM)

T01 – Transite Piping in Accessible in Stairwell to Basement (Assumed ACM)

PT01 – Textured Paint in Basement on Floors and Walls (Non-ACM)

CM01 – Carpet Mastic on Porch (Non-ACM)

DRAWINGS

COMPANY & INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS