ATTACHMENT F - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE - NX EQ Microwave Therapy Systems Tissue Ablation.pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NX EQ Microwave Therapy Systems Tissue Ablation
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G25R0040
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Strategic Acquisition Center solicitation for NX EQ Microwave Therapy Systems: Tissue Ablation. The solicitation (No. 36C10G25R0040) seeks Varian Medical Systems IntelliBlate™ Microwave Ablation System or an equivalent product. Offerors are required to submit up to five references from the past three years, who will be asked to complete a detailed evaluation covering quality of service, cost control, timeliness of performance, and business relations using a three-point rating scale.
The questionnaire is to be completed by reference contacts and emailed to Trevor Mason at Trevor.Mason@va.gov by 06/09/2025 at 0900 EST. References will assess the offeror's performance across categories including contract compliance, cost management, milestone achievement, and responsiveness. The evaluation includes specific rating guidelines for each performance category, with ratings ranging from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 3 (Excellent), and requires references to indicate whether they would choose to work with the offeror again. The ultimate goal is to establish a VA-wide requirements contract for microwave therapy systems used in thermal ablation of soft tissue and organ regions.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire
SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G25R0040
DESCRIPTION: NX EQ Microwave Therapy Systems: Tissue Ablation – Varian Medical Systems IntelliBlate™ Microwave Ablation System or Equal
Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO: Trevor Mason E-MAIL: Trevor.Mason@va.gov
VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above.
The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:
Offeror Name:
(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)
Contract Number: (Insert Applicable Contract Number Here)
Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.
Please E-mail Questionnaire to Trevor.Mason@va.gov by 06/09/2025, at 0900 EST.
Name of Reference: (Reference Complete These
Sections) Title of Reference:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Organization:
Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):
Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):
Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?
Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:
Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
mailto:Trevor.Mason@va.gov mailto:Trevor.Mason@va.gov
Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Rating Guidelines:
Rating Quality of
Service Cost Control
Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations
1: Unsatisfactory Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives
Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively
Offeror delays have jeopardized performance
Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective
2: Satisfactory Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified
Offeror is usually effective in managing costs
Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective
3: Excellent Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services
Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices
Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule
Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines
Offeror Evaluation:
Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above)
Category Description
Quality of Service
In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence:
Comment from Reference: _______________________
Cost Control Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation:
Timeliness of
Performance Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule:
Business Relations
Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems:
YES NO Overall Satisfaction
Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .