ATTACHMENT F_PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G25Q0093
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Strategic Acquisition Center solicitation for NX EQ Cryotherapy Systems, with solicitation number 36C10G25Q0093. The questionnaire is designed for references to evaluate an offeror's performance across four key categories: quality of service, cost control, timeliness of performance, and business relations, using a rating scale from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 3 (excellent).
The solicitation seeks a VA-wide requirements contract for Cryotherapy Systems: Tissue Ablation Endoscopic product line. Offerors are required to submit up to five references from the past three years, with the past performance questionnaire to be completed and emailed to Levi Russin by August 26, 2025, at 12:00 PM EST. The evaluation will assess the offeror's ability to meet contract requirements, manage costs effectively, deliver on time, and maintain professional business relations, with the ultimate goal of determining whether the reference would choose to work with the offeror again.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10G25Q0093 Vendor Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G25Q0093 0001 SF30.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G25Q0093_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT G_PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT A - PRICE COST SCHEDULE - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT C_CONTRACT CLAUSES - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G25Q0093.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT E_REPORTING TOOL - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT H_RFQ QUESTIONS - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT D_SOLICITATION PROVISIONS - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT B _CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION - NX EQ CRYOTHERAPY SYSTEMS.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire
SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G25Q0093
DESCRIPTION: NX EQ Cryotherapy Systems
Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO: Levi Russin E-MAIL: Levi.Russin@va.gov
VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:
Offeror Name:
(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)
| Contract Number: |
| (Insert Applicable Contract Number Here) |
Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.
Please E-mail Questionnaire to Levi.Russin@va.gov by August 26, 2025, at 12:00 PM EST.
| Name of Reference: |
| (Reference Complete These Sections) |
Title of Reference:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Organization:
Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):
Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):
Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?
Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:
Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Rating Guidelines:
| Rating |
| Quality of Service |
| Cost Control |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Business Relations |
| 1: Unsatisfactory |
| Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives |
| Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Offeror delays have jeopardized performance |
| Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective |
| 2: Satisfactory |
| Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified |
| Offeror is usually effective in managing costs |
| Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective |
| 3: Excellent |
| Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services |
| Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices |
| Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines |
Offeror Evaluation:
| Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above) |
| Category |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence: |
Comment from Reference: _______________________
| Cost Control |
| Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation: |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule: |
| Business Relations |
| Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems: |
| |_| YES |_| NO |
| Overall Satisfaction |
| Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .