ATTACHMENT F PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (AOI).docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C79121R0006
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S02 36C79121R0006 0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C79121R0006 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C79121R0006 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C79121R0006 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT A SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (AOI).docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C79121R0006.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT E PAST PERFORMANCE RFERENCE GUIDANCE (AOI).docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT D PRICE SCHEDULE (AOI).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT B TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (SALIENT CHARACTERISTICS) (AOI).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
The Department of Veterans Affairs National Acquisition Center, Commodities and Services Acquisition Service, Denver Logistics Center
AOI SOLCITITATION NO. 36C79120R0006
ATTACHMENT F, PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs, Commodities & Services Acquisition Service (CSAS) | Golden, CO The following Offeror has submitted a proposal for for AOI products and related services and has referenced your company for the purpose of obtaining related professional references. Please provide information on the past performance of the Offeror under evaluation by completing this document and returning it via email to:
Thomas Brick, thomas.brick@va.gov, and Joanna Hudson-Lundquist, joanna.hudson-lundquist@va.gov.
Solicitation Number
Name of the Offeror (“Contractor”)
Please, describe the nature of your contract with the referenced Offeror (Please use the “Additional Comments” block on the second page for additional information.)
Name of Company/Organization Providing References
Name and Title of the Company/Organization Point of Contact (POC)
Company/Organization POC Email]
Company/Organization POC Telephone Number
Contract Description
Contract Number or Project ID
Period of Performance
Contract Award Amount
Complete the following questions, by marking the adjectival ratings and providing comments in which there was significant discrepancies or excellent performance.
PLEASE NOTE: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations, contractors may be advised of adverse remarks and given an opportunity to respond. However, the contracting officer will not provide your name or copies of this questionnaire to the contractor or any other party not directly involved in the evaluation of the contractor’s proposal.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS DEFINITIONS
Low Risk
(LR)
Little doubt exists, based on the contractor's past performance record, that the contractor can successfully perform requirements similar in size, scope, and complexity provided in the Solicitation. The past performance is relevant, recent, and the PPIRS or PPQs reflect satisfactory or better performance.
Moderate Risk
(MR)
Some doubt exists, based on the contractor's past performance record, that the contractor can successfully perform requirements similar in size, scope, and complexity provided in the Solicitation. The past performance is relevant and recent. The PPIRS or PPQs may reflect minimally satisfactory performance.
High Risk
(HR)
Significant doubt exists, based on the contractor's past performance record, that the contractor can successfully perform requirements similar in size, scope, and complexity provided in the Solicitation. The past performance is relevant, recent, but the PPIRS or PPQs may not reflect satisfactory performance.
Neutral (N) The contractor has no relevant or recent past performance.
| PAST PERFORMANCE |
| ADJECTIVAL RATINGS |
| 1. How well were the contract terms & conditions adhered to by the Contractor? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 2. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to all quality standards? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 3. To what extent did the contractor adhere to the performance schedule and reporting requirements? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 4. How responsive was the contractor in resolving quality, schedule, or other contract issues? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 5. How effective was the contractor in addressing urgent or unusual customer needs and issues? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 6. How well did the contractor meet all contractual training requirements? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 7. How would you rate the Contractor’s customer support skills, including technical assistance, product support, and direct client engagement? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
| 7. How satisfied were you with the contractor’s overall performance? |
| LR |
| MR |
| HR |
| N |
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .