Attachment F- Commonwealth's Response to Vendors' 2nd Set Written Questions RFB 758 2700000066.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFB 758 2700000066 4
- Issued by
- Elliott County, Kentucky
About this file
This document is the Commonwealth of Kentucky's Office of Technology response to vendors' second set of written questions regarding Request for Bid (RFB) 758 2700000066 for Network Security Software, Hardware, and Services. The RFB solicits proposals from vendors to provide a comprehensive range of network security solutions including hardware, software, maintenance, training, and professional services. The document addresses seven vendor inquiries that clarify evaluation criteria, vendor qualification requirements, product category definitions, and delivery timelines. Key clarifications include confirmation that the Commonwealth will accept authorization letters from distributors for vendors who work exclusively through specific distributors in the state, local, and educational markets (SLED), and that delivery timelines are based on when the Delivery Order is issued, with references to Section 2(K) of Attachment A for specific delivery provisions.
The evaluation methodology outlined in updated versions of Attachments A and B establishes that vendors will be assessed based on proposed minimum discount levels across five product categories. The Commonwealth clarified that vendors not offering specific categories such as hardware will be evaluated accordingly in the revised Attachment B, and that weighting methodology across competitive categories and combined discount evaluation criteria are detailed in the updated solicitation documents. Insurance requirements must comply with Commonwealth standards as specified in the RFB and Addendum 2, Section 47(2)(C). Vendors must provide documentation of authorized carrier status in Kentucky, and the procurement addresses potential delivery challenges, including consideration of industry-wide supply chain issues such as chip shortages, with specific guidance referenced in Attachment A, Section 2(K).
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Attachment F - Commonwealth's Response to Vendors' Written Questions Form, RFB 758 2700000066 |
| Network Security Software, Hardware, and Services |
| Vendor Name |
| Question # | RFB Section / Requirement Number | Document | Document Page Number | Vendor Questions | Commonwealth Response |
| 1 | Section A | Attachment B | 1 | Can you please specify what your you are looking when you state 'Microsoft Exchange' as that covers many options? | See updated Attachment B |
| 2 | Section 47, 2 (c ) | Addendum 2 | 41 | Insurance Requirements, Section 47, 2(C ), p.41 of Addendum 2 - Can the University clarify if an insurance agent that is approved to operate in the State of KY as an non-admitted carrier, and whose admitted paper is filed, be considered an authorized company? | This RFB is for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth Office of Technology and not a university. Please comply with the Insurance requirements in the RFB. |
| 3 | REVISED Attachment B - RFB 758 2700000066-REV09112026 (3).docx - Section A | RFB 758 2700000066 | 1 | Attachment B, Section A in your list of prospective vendors, every bidder will be evaluated on their proposed minimum discount levels they offer to Ky COT based on five product areas (hardware, software, maintenance, training, & professional services). How will you evaluate vendors who don't offer specific categories such as hardware offerings, some of the vendors you've listed don't offer any hardware based products for purchase. | See updated Attachment B and updated Attachment A, Section 13(A) |
| 4 | REVISED Attachment B - RFB 758 2700000066-REV09112026 (3).docx Attachment B, Section A | RFB 758 2700000066 | 1 | How will the bidder's discount concessions be evaluated in determining who wins the most points in Attachment B, Section A - will it be based on how many vendor product lines they have the biggest discounts in comparison to other bids, or will you total all the combined discounts for every vendor listed in all product areas (hardware, software, maintenance, training, and professional services) and whomever has the biggest overall total discounts wins first, second, third, etc.? | See updated Attachment B and updated Attachment A, Section 13(A) |
| 5 | REVISED Attachment B - RFB 758 2700000066-REV09112026 (3).docx Attachment B, Section A | RFB 758 2700000066 | 1 | In Attachment B, Section A, how will the Commonwealth weight the pricing across the different categories. For example, will one competitive category (e.g. software, training, etc.) be weighted more than another. | See updated Attachment B and updated Attachment A, Section 13(A) |
| 6 | REVISED Attachment B - RFB 758 2700000066-REV09112026 (3).docx Attachment B, Section A | RFB 758 2700000066 | 1 | One of the vendors in Attachment B, Section A no longer works with ANY reseller directly for the state, local, and educational markets (SLED). All their daily sales and adminstrative responsibilities for this marketplace are managed by a specific distributor. In that case will you accept a letter from the distributor stating that you are an authorized reseller of this particular vendor? | Yes |
| 7 | REVISED Attachment B - RFB 758 2700000066-REV09112026 (3).docx Attachment B, Section A | RFB 758 2700000066 | 2 | Regarding delivery timeline, is the due date based on when the Delivery Order is issued? In addition, when is an order view as delivered? Will there be any xceptions made for such events as worldwide chip shortages or can orders be rejected if there is a known backlog for what is requestsed? | See Attachment A, Section 2(K) |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .