Attachment D - Reference Check Form~10.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-69000-00011548
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for the RFP - S-69000-00011548 - Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area Project. The purpose of this form is to gather feedback from references on the overall quality of services provided, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues by the offeror. The form requests the reference entity, contact name, telephone number, and email address, and asks the reference to rate the offeror on a scale of 0-10 for the specified criteria, with the option to provide comments.
The document does not provide any additional details about the project, procurement process, or contract terms. It is focused solely on the reference check component of the evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement Information~55.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment G - Responsibility Inquiry~10.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - Sample Services Contract~10.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B - Disclosure Exemption Affidavit~13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment F - COBID Certification_Outreach Plan~10.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C - Proposer Information and Certification Sheet~11.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP S-69000-00011548.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP – S-69000-00011548 – Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area Project Attachment D
ATTACHMENT D — REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Offeror Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied
1. How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?
Score:
Comments
2. How would you rate the Offeror’s delivery of service?
Score:
Comments
3. How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score:
Comments
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – August 16, 2021 Page 1 of 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .