Attachment D - Reference Check Form.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Lenel OnGuard Card Lock Access System Updates, Equipment, Install, and Maintenance
Solicitation number
S-34000-00011355
Issued by
Clackamas County, Jackson County, Multnomah County, Medford City, Oregon

About this file

This document is a Reference Check Form for an Intermediate Procurement S-34000-00011355 - Lenel OnGuard Card Lock Access System Updates, Equipment, Install, and Maintenance. The form is to be used by the Offeror to obtain references from other entities regarding the Offeror's overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues. The reference is asked to rate the Offeror on a scale of 0-10 for each of these criteria, with 0 being "Not satisfied" and 10 being "Extremely satisfied". The form also provides space for the reference to provide comments on each of the rated criteria.

The document does not contain details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, current environment, funding requirements and sources, or contract term and renewal options. This appears to be a standard reference check form to be submitted as part of the solicitation response.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Intermediate Procurement S-34000-00011355 – Lenel OnGuard Card Lock Access System Updates, Equipment, Install, and Maintenance

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Offeror Name:__________________________________________
Reference Entity:__________________________________________
Reference Contact Name:__________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number:__________________________________________
Contact Email Address:__________________________________________

Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.

How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ How would you rate the Offeror’s delivery of service?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?

Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014Page 1 of 2
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 August 16, 2021Page 1 of 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .