Attachment D.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M220QNMAN01449
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for the solicitation for emergent drydock repairs to the NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON. The questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor's past work and submitted to NOAA Contract Specialist Jessica Loftus by September 2, 2020. It includes questions rating a contractor's quality of service, schedule, and management on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. The solicitation seeks repairs to the EM2040 transducer and bow thruster of the THOMAS JEFFERSON. The requirement was issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as solicitation number 1305M220QNMAN01449.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment D.5 Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ FY21 DD Emergent Repairs (TJ).pdf | ||
| Attachment D.4 US DOL POSTER.pdf | ||
| Specs.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment D.2 Past Performance Information Form.rtf | RTF text file | |
| Attachment D.1 MOA2-10(20) TJFY21EmergentDD.pdf | ||
| References.zip | ZIP file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M220QNMAN01449 Attachment: D.3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Jessica Loftus (Jessica.Loftus@noaa.gov) no later than September 2, 2020 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Jessica Loftus, no later than August 20, 2020 12:00 pm Eastern Time:
Jessica.Loftus@noaa.gov
Source Selection Information
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .