ATTACHMENT D.1 - QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN.pdf
PDF 218 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24925R0031
About this file
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) outlines the performance evaluation methodology for a Plastic Surgery Services contract with UT Medical Group, Inc. for the VA Medical Center. The document details nine key performance standards that will be monitored, including provider quality performance, qualifications of key personnel, privileging, patient access, patient safety, maintenance of licensing/registration/certification, mandatory training, privacy/confidentiality compliance, and scope of practice.
The surveillance methods include 100% direct observation, periodic inspections, and random sampling, with an acceptable quality level (AQL) of 95% for most performance metrics. Performance will be rated using the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), with potential ratings ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. The Contracting Officer (Robert Pritchard) and Contracting Officer's Representative (Collette Scott) from the Memphis VAMC will conduct quarterly progress reports and have the authority to issue Contract Reports (CRs) if performance standards are not met, requiring the contractor to develop corrective action plans.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S05 Vendor Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24925R0031 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT D.3 - CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT D.2 - RULES OF BEHAVIOR.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT D.4 - STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT AND UNDERSTANDING.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT D.5 - ORG CONFLICT OF INTEREST.pdf | ||
| 36C24925R0031.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT D.6 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP No. 36C24925R0031 D.1. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Contract Number:
Contractor Name: UT MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
Description: Furnish Plastic Surgery Services support in accordance with the PWS
The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
• What will be monitored?
• How will monitoring will take place?
• Who will conduct the monitoring?
• How will monitoring efforts and results be documented?
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
The CS for this contract is:
Laura Edelman, Network Contracting Office (NCO9) laura.edelman@va.gov
The CO for this contract is:
Robert Pritchard, Network Contracting Office (NCO9) robert.pritchard2@va.gov
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR:
Collette Scott, Memphis VAMC
(901) 523-8990 ext. 6523; collette.scott@va.gov
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.
mailto:laura.edelman@va.gov mailto:robert.pritchard2@va.gov mailto:collette.scott@va.gov
RFP No. 36C24925R0031 D.1. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Primary Program Manager:
Alternate Program Manager:
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.
The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.
5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. 100% surveillance.
b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. Inspections scheduled and reported quarterly per COR delegation or as needed.
c. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. N/A
d. RANDOM SAMPLING. All reviews and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.
e. VERIFICATION AND/OR DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. N/A
D.1 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) – RFP No. 36C24925R0031
6. QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE:
Measures PWS Reference
Performance Requirement
Standard Acceptable Quality Level
Surveillance Method
Met AQL/DID NOT MEET
AQL-
CPAR RATING/ADD
COMMENTS
1-Provider Quality Performance
4.6.5.1 OPPE documentation
for all (100%) staff providing services under the contract. All staff (100%) meet Standards.
100% of care 95% of care provided OPPE provided within within clinical clinical standards of standards of care care
2 - Qualifications of Key 4.6.5.2 All Contractor’s physician(s) shall be Board Certified / Board Eligible in accordance with American Board of Plastic Surgery Standards and the requirements of the
PWS.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s) are Board Certified / Board Eligible.
95% Random Inspection of qualification documents
Personnel
3 - Privileging 4.6.5.3 Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) perform within their individual scopes of practice/privileging.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) perform within their scope of practice/privileges 100% of the time.
Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) perform within their scope of practice/privileges 95% of the time.
Random Inspection of records.
4- Patient Access 4.6.5.4 The Contractor shall provide Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) in accordance with the operating hours and VA clinical schedule outlined in this PWS.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) are on time and available to perform services.
Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) are on-time and available to perform services 95% of the time.
Periodic Sampling of Time and Attendance Sheets and Attending’s OR Report.
Periodic Sampling of
The Contractor shall provide Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) in accordance with the operating hours and VA clinical schedule outlined in this PWS.
Time and Attendance Sheets and Attending’s OR Report.
5 - Patient Safety 4.6.5.5 Patient safety incidents shall be reported using Patient Safety Report. All incidents reported immediately (within 24 hours.)
All (100%) of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety Report within 24 hours of incident.
95% of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety Report within 24 hours of incident.
Direct Observation
6 - Maintains licensing, 4.6.5.6 Updated Licensing, registration and certification shall be provided as they are renewed. Licensing and registration information kept current.
All (100%) licensing, registration(s) and certification(s) for Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) shall be provided as they are renewed. Licensing and registration information kept current.
95% licensing, registration(s) and certification(s) for Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s) shall be provided as they are renewed.
Licensing and registration information kept current.
Review registration, and certification
7 - Mandatory Training
4.6.5.7 Contractor shall
complete all required training on time per VAMC policy
All (100%) of required training is complete on time by Contractor’s physician(s) and physician assistant(s).
95% timely completions.
Sampling
8 - Privacy, Confidentiality and
4.6.5.8
Contractor is aware of all laws, regulations, policies and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and HIPAA and complies with all standards, zero breaches of privacy or confidentiality.
All (100%) Contractor's physician(s) and physician assistant(s) comply with all laws, regulations, policies and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality and
HIPAA
95% compliance.
Sampling;
Contractor shall provide evidence of annual training required by
VAMC,
reports violations per VA Directive 6500.6.
HIPAA
9 – Scope of Practice 4.6.5.9 Contractor’s physician assistant(s) perform within their individual scopes of practice.
All (100%) Contractor’s physician assistant(s) perform within their scope of practice 100% of the time.
Contractor’s physician assistant(s) perform within their scope of practice 95% of the time.
Random Inspection of records.
7. CPAR RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS:
Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual https://www.cpars.gov/documents/CPARS-Guidance.pdf.)
EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.
Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).
UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters).
https://www.cpars.gov/documents/CPARS-Guidance.pdf
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CPARS.
b. If contractor performance does not meet the AQL, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.
Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CR on the following page.
9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP
COR NAME/TITLE DATE
CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE
CONTRACT REPORT
1. CONTRACT NUMBER 2. REPORT NUMBER
3. TO: (Contracting Officer) 4. FROM: (Name of COR)
5. DATES
a. CR PREPARED
b. RETURNED BY
CONTRACTOR:
c. ACTION COMPLETE
6. Issue Identified (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)
7. SIGNATURE OF COR Date:
8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER Date:
9a. TO (Contracting Officer) 9a. FROM (Contractor)
10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE Date:
12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION.
13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
14. CLOSE OUT
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE
CONTRACTOR
NOTIFIED
COR
CONTRACTING
OFFICER
| The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following: |
| 2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES |
| 3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES |
| 4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS |
| 5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE |
| 8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE |
| 9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .