Attachment D - 3568.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-58100-00003568
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
The document provided is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form from RFP [###-####-##] - [RFP title] for the Evaluation of Oregon State School Fund. This RFP is being issued by the state of Oregon, with the primary jurisdictions being Marion County and the City of Salem. The reference check form requests information on the proposer's overall quality of services, delivery of service, responsiveness to customer service issues, as well as details on the type of services provided, satisfaction with the business relationship, problem resolution methods, likelihood of future use, adherence to timeline, and comparison of final project cost to initial proposed cost.
The RFP appears to be for a research/evaluation study on the Oregon State School Fund. No specifics are provided on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or contract term and renewal options.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment F - 3568.doc | DOC document | |
| ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FOR RFP S-581-00003568.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP OB S-58100-00003568 State School Fund.pdf | ||
| RPF S-58100-00003568 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.pdf | ||
| Preliminary Results~13.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment B - 3568.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment C - 3568.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment G - 3568.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
RFP OB-581000-00003568 – Evaluation of Oregon State School Fund
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Email Address:
Referenced Website Proposer
Created Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ Please respond to the following questions:
1. For what type of services did you engage Proposer?
2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1.
3. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.
4. Describe the Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.
5. How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?
6. How well did the Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?
7. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?
Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .