Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Defense Policy Review Initiative (DPRI) Program Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M95494-20-Q-0022
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for the Defense Policy Review Initiative (DPRI) Program Support solicitation issued by the United States Marine Corps. Key details include:
-
The solicitation number is M95494-20-Q-0022 and seeks support for the DPRI program. Offerors must submit completed past performance questionnaires from previous contracts by 17 July 2020. The questionnaires require assessment of an offeror's performance across quality, timeliness, business relations, and staffing. Assessors are asked to provide ratings on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory and indicate if they would hire the contractor in the future.
-
The past performance questionnaire templates include sections for offerors to provide contract information and for assessors to evaluate performance and provide comments. Assessors are asked to return completed questionnaires to ana.cruzzavala@usmc.mil by 0900 EST on 17 July 2020 to assist with source selection for this solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M95494-20-Q-0022 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| DPRI Questions and Answers 0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A- DD254.pdf | ||
| M95494-20-Q-0022 Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B- Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment C : Past Performance Questionnaire
| Solicitation Number |
| M95494-20-Q-0022 |
| Customer |
| HQMC, PP&O |
| Requirement/Project Title |
| Defense Policy Review Initiative (DPRI) Program Support |
Instructions:
· Section I is to be completed by the Offeror/Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The Offeror shall submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.
· Section I is to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections II and III are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
· Assessor shall submit the completed form to the Contracting Office per the instructions below.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the United States Marine Corps (USMC) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Ana Cruz at ana.cruzzavala@usmc.mil by 0900 (EST) on 17 July 2020.
1. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
Contractor Name:
Contract Number:
Type of Contract:
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Brief Requirement Description:
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
1. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
1. Performance Evaluation
Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable (N/A). See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| N/A |
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Source Selection Information See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 M95494-20-Q-0022
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .