Attachment B - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
H146--Copy of AT RISK | Water System Testing and Maintenance | Water Management Program Services | (VA-24-00094196)
Solicitation number
36C24424Q1010
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Comprehensive Water Management Program solicitation under Solicitation Number 36C24424Q1010. The questionnaire requests the contractor's identifying information, evaluator information, and an assessment of the contractor's quality of services, timeliness of performance, and business relations. It also asks the evaluator to identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses and whether they would award to the contractor again. The overall past/present performance rating is to be provided based on the adjectival rating descriptions provided.

The related federal contract opportunity is a Combined Synopsis Solicitation for commercial services for a Comprehensive Water Management Program at the Pittsburgh VA Medical Center. The government anticipates awarding one, five-year, firm-fixed-price Indefinite Delivery - Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for these services. The solicitation is a Small Business set-aside with a NAICS code of 541380 and a requirement for System for Award Management (SAM) registration prior to award. The period of performance is anticipated to be 09/23/2024-09/22/2029.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24424Q1010 0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment E - Question and Answer -9-12-24.docx DOCX document
Combined Synopsis - 36C24424Q1010 - Water Management Prog.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
36C24424Q1010.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Question and Answer.docx DOCX document
Attachment C - Price Schedule.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT B

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Comprehensive Water Management Program

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO EDWARD FERKEL, EDWARD.FERKEL@VA.GOV. SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 AT 10:00AM.:

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award:

Current estimated contract dollar amount:

Describe service acquired:

II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Relation to Program:

(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)

Time On Contract:

III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance Adjectival Rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.

EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

A. QUALITY OF SERVICES

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment which is properly maintained, quality control for the performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’sspecific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing anyadministrative reports/documents required by your contract.

2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

C. BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correctnoncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous andresponsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?

2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES |_| NO |_|

If no, please explain:

F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .