Attachment B Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ESPC NDER 7 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- GSANDER72023
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ESPC NDER 7 NOO Amendment 0004.pdf | ||
| Attachment A EOI Supplemental Data Revised.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ESPC NDER 7 NOO Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| NOO Amendment 0003 Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| NDER 7 - NOO Questions (1).pdf | ||
| ESPC NDER 7 NOO Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| ESPC NDER 7 NOO - Amendment 0001 2023 05 09.pdf | ||
| Attachment C Table for Factor 1 Experience.docx | DOCX document | |
| ESPC NDER 7 NOO.pdf | ||
| Attachment A EOI Supplemental Data .xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE:
Notice of Opportunity issued by the General Services Administration Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) National Deep Energy Retrofit (NDER) Round 7 Program
ESCOs: Please complete Section 1, and request that your Project Reference complete Section 2 and submit the completed questionnaire directly to heidi.johnson@gsa.gov and sharon.conger@gsa.gov by 12 noon (EST), June 19, 2023.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete questions #1-4)
1. Contractor Information:
Firm Name:
Address:
Point of Contact:
Contact Phone Number:
Contact email Address:
2. Work Performed as:
___ Prime Contractor ___Subcontractor ___Joint Venture ___Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed internally (by ESCO):
If subcontractor, who was the prime? (Firm name/phone #):
3. Contract Information:
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: ___ ESPC ___Other (If “Other”, please specify type of contract, including Fixed Price/Cost Reimbursement/Time & Materials/Other):
Contract Title:
Contract Location(s) (city and state):
Type of Buildings/Facilities (circle all that apply): offices, laboratory space, data centers, warehouses, prisons, courthouses, military bases
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Original Scheduled Contract Acceptance (construction accepted) Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Contract Acceptance (construction accepted) Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original (awarded) Implementation Price (excludes finance and service period costs):
Original (awarded) Contract Price (all costs including design/implementation, finance, and service period costs):
Final/Current Contract Total Price: (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work: ___High ___Med ___Routine What were the major energy or water conservation measures implemented in the contract? (e.g., lighting, controls)
SECTION 2: EVALUATOR INFORMATION (Client Evaluator to complete items #5-7 and Past Performance Questionnaire below)
5. Evaluator Information:
Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email:
6. Describe the Evaluator’s role in the project:__________________________
7. Evaluator’s Signature: ______________________________________ Date: ________________
INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATOR: Thank you for your assistance. Your participation is very important to our procurement. Please provide responses to the questions below (as applicable) by circling the appropriate adjectival ratings. Please also provide brief comments addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, or deficiencies which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary). The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
The completed questionnaire must be submitted directly by the Evaluator to the General Services Administration.
PLEASE SEND BY E-MAIL DIRECTLY TO:
heidi.johnson@gsa.gov with a courtesy copy to sharon.conger@gsa.gov
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS
| Rating |
| Definition |
| (O) Outstanding |
| Performance was substantially and consistently above contract requirements. Contractor displayed an overall superior understanding of contract requirements, and may have used innovative approaches leading to enhanced performance. |
| (AA) Above Average |
| Performance was above minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a thorough understanding of contract requirements. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance met minimum contract requirements. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance was below minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a lack of thorough understanding of contract requirements in one or more significant performance areas. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance completely failed to meet the minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a total lack of understanding of contract requirements. |
| (NA) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please circle (or highlight) the adjectival rating which best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance and provide comments explaining your rating. If you need additional space, please attach additional pages.
1. QUALITY
| a) M&V Reports were timely and accurate. |
| O AA S M U NA |
| b) M&V Reports demonstrated that contracted guaranteed savings was met. |
| O AA S M U NA |
| b) Contractor’s ability to meet quality design and construction standards specified for technical performance |
| O AA S M U NA |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution |
| O AA S M U NA |
Comments Regarding Quality:
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| O AA S M U NA |
Comments Regarding Schedule/Timeliness:
3. COMMUNICATION
a) Effectiveness of the contractor’s communication strategy (e.g. did you know who to call, did they call you when needed, and were they responsive, etc.)?
O AA S M U NA
| b) Contractor’s cooperation and ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes? |
| O AA S M U NA |
Comments Regarding Communications:
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| a) Project Development Phase: Development team was appropriately staffed and supported by ESCO management? Overall effectiveness of program and project management during project development? |
| O AA S M U NA |
| b) Implementation Phase: Effectiveness of project management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force. |
| O AA S M U NA |
| c) How well did the contractor team handle transitions of personnel, either due to changes in personnel or moving into a different phase of the project (e.g. moving from award to construction or construction into the performance period)? |
| O AA S M U NA |
Comments Regarding Management:
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Contractor’s ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price? |
| O AA S M U NA |
| b) Contractor’s proposal of innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefitted the client |
| O AA S M U NA |
| c) The contract information provided by the contractor above (in Section 1) appears to be accurate and complete. (If “No,” please explain below.) |
| Yes No |
Comments Regarding Cost/Financial Management:
6. SAFETY/ SECURITY
| To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| O AA S M U NA |
Comments Regarding Safety/Security:
7. PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
| a) If you required similar services in the future, would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
| b) Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| O AA S M U NA |
Summary Comments:
Thank you for completing this questionnaire. Your assistance is sincerely appreciated.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .