Attachment B - OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 136 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation - Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) Food and Drug Administration New Laboratory
- Solicitation number
- 47PJ0022R0054
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to a solicitation from the General Services Administration (GSA) for construction manager as constructor (CMc) services for a new laboratory building for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the Denver Federal Center grounds. Offerors are required to distribute past performance questionnaires to references for similar projects defined as new Biosafety Level 2 or 3 laboratory construction projects valued over $60 million where the offeror served as the CMc or general contractor. References must return completed questionnaires directly to the GSA contracting officer by May 6, 2022. The questionnaire collects information on the offeror's performance in areas such as cost savings, design collaboration, accounting and cost tracking, corrective action, quality control, schedule adherence, and an overall rating. References are also asked if they would award to the contractor again and provide additional contacts.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the overall completion and submission of the Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project. The Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete the questionnaire. Offerors may complete the questionnaire on the behalf of references, contingent there is submission of proof that said referenced actually rated the firm. Proof may include a copy of an email or email confirmation from respondent that they concur with responses, letter from respondent, or correspondence directly sent to the Contracting Officer. Non submission of concurrence from each reference may eliminate your questionnaire response from further consideration. Each Reference shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer not later than 4:00 PM MOUNTAIN TIME, May 06, 2022.
Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to: Joseph Dorsey, Contracting Officer at joseph.dorsey@gsa.gov
Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0022R0054 - New FDA Lab CMc - PPQ.”
A Similar Project is defined as a project that was substantially completed within the ten years since issuance of this solicitation. In addition, the project must also feature all of the following elements:
a. It was a new BSL-Level 2 to 3 Laboratory up to regulatory code;
b. For which the offeror served as as the Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) or General Contractor; and
c. The project construction cost at award was greater than or equal to $60,000,000.00.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Offeror
Name of Respondent/Title:
Did the Offeror perform as the Prime Contractor?
Contract Number
Contract Type (CMc, DB, DBB)
Period of Performance
Gross Square Footage of Facility Construction:
| Contract Value at initial award |
| $ |
Briefly describe all construction work performed under this contract:
Continued on next page
Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE
Is the information provided by the Offeror in Section 1 both accurate and complete (yes or no): ___________
Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________
Firm Name: _________________________________________________________
Phone:_____________________________________________________________
Email:______________________________________________________________
Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.
PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| N/A |
Identification of cost saving and value engineering measures. How successful was the Offeror at suggesting meaningful cost saving changes during the design process
Collaboration on design and constructability issues. How successful was the Offeror at providing meaningful feedback on potential design constructability issues during the design process
The adequacy of the Offeror’s accounting system for the management and tracking of costs
Correction of deficient work in a timely manner
The adequacy of the Offeror’s quality control measures.
Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)
Timely performance of contract requirements
Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance
Continued on next page
1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________
2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________
Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .