Attachment 9 Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Table_Charts_Definitions.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
---AMENDED -------Space Test Course Development and Execution (STCDE) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9304-22-R-5004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 9

ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-2 TABLE/CHARTS/DEFINITIONS

Table C-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating
Description
Acceptable
Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable
Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Chart A. Relevancy Definitions

Assessment Area

Very Relevant
Relevant
Somewhat

Relevant Not Relevant

Scope / Complexity
Contractor has performed as a prime contractor on a space test education, curriculum development and execution contract
Contractor has performed as a prime contractor on a test education, curriculum development and execution contract
Contractor has performed as a prime contractor on a curriculum development and execution contract
Magnitude
$5M or greater
$3M or greater
$500K or greater
Contract Type
Performance under a Firm-Fixed Price IDIQ type Contract
Performance under a Fixed Price non-IDIQ type Contract, Task Order or Purchase Order
Performance under any contract type other than a Fixed Price Contract, Task Order or Purchase Order
Contract Environment
Contract Performance on a United States Air Force or Air Reserve

Base (CONUS)

Contract Performance on a DoD installation
Contract performance at a Federal, State, County, or City facility within the United States.

Table 4. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating
Definition
Very Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort

and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities

this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and

complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and

complexities this solicitation requires.

E
V
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government's benefits. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not et identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Table 5. Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Method

Adjective Rating
Description
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluate favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform there required efforts.

Attachment 9 – Addendum FAR 52.212-2 Table/Charts/Definitions

FA9304-22-R-5004

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .