Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

PDF 987 KB Posted

Attached to
---AMENDED -------Space Test Course Development and Execution (STCDE) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9304-22-R-5004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SPACE TEST COURSE DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION PAST

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionnaire

FA9304-22-R-5004

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionnaire

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Performance E V S M U N/A

1. How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development and/or execution schedule?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs, such as emergencies or delays due to weather, natural disaster or Pandemic related events?

3. How well did the contractor support special events, such as schedule surges due to air shows, exercises, installation open houses, etc?

4. Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes?

5. How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes?

6. How well did the contractor comply with regulatory guidance such as local, state and federal guidelines?

Program Management E V S M U N/A

1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and perform on-time)?

2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with contract requirements?

5. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved schedule or other factors?

6. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

Program Management E V S M U N/A

7. Were any letters of concern, show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract? If so, please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue.

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, I

[ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Email Instructions:

TO: AFTC/PZZC

ATTN: Maria Estevane

E-Mail to: Maria.estevane.1@us.af.mil cc: charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil

FA9304-22-R-5004

mailto:Maria.estevane.1@us.af.mil mailto:charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil

E1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA1 How well did the contractor adhere to the curriculum development andor execution schedule SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA2 How well did the contractor adapt to changing needs such as emergencies or delays due to weather natural disaster or Pandemic related events SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA3 How well did the contractor support special events such as schedule surges due to air shows exercises installation open houses etc SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA4 Is the contractor responsive to short notice changes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA5 How well did the contractor implement current quality control processes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and perform ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with contract requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA5 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved schedule or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA6 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA7 Were any letters of concern show cause or cure notices required to be issued during performance of this contract If so please describe the issue and how the contractor responded to resolve the issue SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
E1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
V1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
S1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
M1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
U1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NA1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ME2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .