Attachment 8 Specifications MARAD DOT Warehouse.pdf

PDF 8 MB Posted

Attached to
MARAD 2 DOT NDRF WHARF
Solicitation number
47PH0524R0093
Issued by

About this file

This document appears to be the technical specifications for the relocation of the Maritime Administration (MARAD) from the Hale Boggs Building to the Department of Transportation (DOT) Warehouse building in New Orleans, Louisiana. The project involves demolition of interior finishes, partial removal of exterior cladding, and removal of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire sprinkler, and other systems within the area to be renovated. New work includes installation of interior finishes, exterior cladding, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and fixtures, fire sprinklers, and other systems related to the renovation of the office area. Some minor site work is also included. The estimated construction cost magnitude for all work is between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. The project is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside with the NAICS code 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. A site visit is scheduled for July 25, 2024 and the solicitation closing date is August 29, 2024.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NEW ORLEANS - BAY WATER DISTRICT - LOUISIANA

RELOCATION of BOGGS MARAD to

DOT WAREHOUSE

Building Number: LA9901 38 Poland Avenue and Chartres – Wharf 3 – Bays 43, 44, and 45

100% DESIGN SUBMITTAL

SPECIFICATIONS

October 18, 2023

United States General Services Administration

Public Building Service – Greater Southwest Region (7) Hale Boggs Federal Building

500 Poydras Street - New Orleans - LA 70130

10000 Richmond Avenue – Suite 100 Houston – Texas 77042

(713)629-6100 – www.pdgarchitects.com

October 18, 2023

RELOCATION of BOGGS MARAD to DOT WAREHOUSE LA9901 - Wharf 3 - BAYS 43, 44, and 45 GSA Project No. 66518

TABLE OF CONTENTS 000001 - Page 1 of 4

PDG ARCHITECTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

000000 TABLE OF CONTENTS

000107 DESIGN TEAM

003126 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION

01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

011000 SUMMARY

011400 WORK RESTRICTIONS

012100 ALLOWANCES

012300 OPTIONS

012500 SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES

012900 PAYMENT PROCEDURES

013000 GSA PROJECT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

013100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION

013110 CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) SCHEDULING

013200 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION

013233 PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

013300 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

013510 HISTORIC BUILDING TREATMENT PROCEDURES

013516 ALTERATION PROJECT PROCEDURES

014000 QUALITY ASSURANCE & CONTROL REQUIREMENTS

014200 REFERENCES

014523 TESTING AND INSPECTING SERVICES

015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

015930 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

015950 SAFETY AND HEALTH

016000 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS

017300 EXECUTION REQUIREMENTS

017310 CUTTING AND PATCHING

017350 FIRE PREVENTION PRECAUTIONS FOR HOT WORK

017410 CONSTRUCTION INDOOR AIR QUALITY (IAQ) MANAGEMENT

017419 CONSTRUCTION NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT AND

DISPOSAL

017700 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES

017810 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS

017822 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

018111 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

018200 DEMONSTRATION AND TRAINING

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS

024119 SELECTIVE DEMOLITION

03 CONCRETE

031000 CONCRETE FORMING AND ACCESSORIES

032000 CONCRETE REINFORCING

033000 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

04 MASONRY

042113 BRICK MASONRY

TABLE OF CONTENTS 000001 - Page 2 of 4

PDG ARCHITECTS

05 METALS

054000 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

055113 METAL PAN STAIRS

055213 PIPE AND TUBE RAILINGS

06 WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES

061053 MISCELLANEOUS ROUGH CARPENTRY

061600 SHEATHING

064013 EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK

064023 INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK

064116 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CABINETS

07 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

071900 WATER REPELLENTS

072100 THERMAL INSULATION

072726 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS

076200 SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM

078100 APPLIED FIRE PROTECTION

078413 PENETRATION FIRESTOPPING

079200 JOINT SEALANTS

08 OPENINGS

081113 HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES

081213 HOLLOW METAL FRAMES

081416 FLUSH WOOD DOORS

083113 ACCESS DOORS AND FRAMES

083213 SLIDING ALUMINUM-FRAMED GLASS DOORS

084113 ALUMINUM-FRAMED STOREFRONTS

085113 ALUMINUM WINDOWS

087100 DOOR HARDWARE

088000 GLAZING

09 FINISHES

092216 NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

092300 CEMENT PLASTER REPAIRS

092900 GYPSUM BOARD

093000 TILING

095123 ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILINGS

096513 RESILIENT BASE AND ACCESSORIES

096519 RESILIENT FLOORING

096813 TILE CARPETING

099114 EXTERIOR PAINTING

099123 INTERIOR PAINTING

10 SPECIALTIES

101423 ROOM-IDENTIFICATION PANEL SIGNAGE

102800 TOILET, BATH, AND LAUNDRY ACCESSORIES

104413 FIRE PROTECTION CABINETS

104416 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 000001 - Page 3 of 4

11 EQUIPMENT

12 FURNISHINGS

122413 ROLLER WINDOW SHADES

123661 QUARTZ AGGLOMERATE COUNTERTOPS

13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

14 CONVEYING EQUIPMENT

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION

FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING AND SPRINKLERS- Refer to Notes on Drawings

22 PLUMBING

220000 GENERAL PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS

220500 PLUMBING BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS

220523 GENERAL-DUTY VALVES FOR PLUMBING PIPING

220529 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS FOR PLUMBING PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

220553 IDENTIFICATION FOR PLUMBING PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

220719 PLUMBING PIPING INSULATION

221116 DOMESTIC WATER PIPING

221119 DOMESTIC WATER PIPING SPECIALTIES

221316 SANITARY WASTE AND VENT PIPING

221319 SANITARY WASTE PIPING SPECIALTIES

23 - HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING

230000 HVAC GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

230500 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

230514 ENCLOSED CONTROLLERS

230515 VARIABLE FREQUENCY CONTROLLERS

230517 SLEEVES AND SLEEVE SEALS FOR HVAC PIPING

230519 METERS AND GAUGES FOR HVAC PIPING

230529 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS

230593 TESTING, ADJUSTING AND BALANCING

230713 DUCT INSULATION

230719 PIPE INSULATION

230923 DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROLS

232300 REFRIGERANT PIPING

233113 METAL DUCTS

233300 DUCT ACCESSORIES

233423 POWER VENTILATORS

236213 VARIABLE REFRIGERANT VOLUME SYSTEMS

233713 DIFFUSERS, REGISTERS, AND GRILLES

237313 MODULAR INDOOR AIR-HANDLING UNITS

238126 SPLIT SYSTEM AIR CONDITIONING UNITS

26 ELECTRICAL

260010 ELECTRICAL GENERAL PROVISIONS

260020 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

260519 LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL POWER CONDUCTORS AND CABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS 000001 - Page 4 of 4

PDG ARCHITECTS

260526 GROUNDING AND BONDING FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

260533 RACEWAYS AND BOXES

260553 ELECTRICAL IDENTIFICATION

260923 LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICES

262200 LOW-VOLTAGE TRANSFORMERS

262416 PANELBOARDS

262726 WIRING DEVICES

262813 FUSES

262816 DISCONNECT SWITCHES AND CIRCUIT BREAKERS

265119 LED INTERIOR LIGHTING

265619 LED EXTERIOR LIGHTING

27 COMMUNICATIONS

STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEMS BY TENANT

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

FIRE ALARM SYSTEM - Refer to Notes on Drawings

32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

321713 PARKING BUMPERS

321723 PAVEMENT MARKINGS

323113 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

END OF SECTION 000000

SEALS PAGE 000107 - Page 1 of 2

PDG ARCHITECTS

DOCUMENT 000107 – DESIGN TEAM

1.1 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS OF RECORD

A. LEAD ARCHITECT

1. PDG Inc. (dba PDG Architects)

2. Houston, TX

B. MEP ENGINEERING

1. IMC

2. New Orleans, LA

C. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

1. EHC Engineering

2. New Orleans, LA

D. SURVEY

1. DDG

2. Baton Rouge, LA

E. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER

1. Garabedian Assoc.

2. Helotes, TX

F. COST ESTIMATING

1. Project Cost Resources

2. Houston, TX

END OF DOCUMENT 000107

SEALS PAGE 000107 - Page 2 of 2

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK

EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION 003126 - Page 1 of 2

PDG ARCHITECTS

DOCUMENT 003126 - EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

INFORMATION

1.1 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION

A. This Document with its referenced attachments is part of the Procurement and Contracting Requirements for Project. They provide GSA's information for Bidders' convenience and are intended to supplement rather than serve in lieu of Bidders' own investigations. They are made available for Bidders' convenience and information, but are not a warranty of existing conditions. This Document and its attachments are not part of the Contract Documents.

B. An existing asbestos report for Project, prepared by Intertek PSI, 11950 Industriplex Blvd. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70819, dated June 15 2022 is available for viewing as appended to this Document.

1. Document 002113 "Instructions to Bidders" for the Bidder's responsibilities for examination of Project site and existing conditions.

2. Section 024119 "Selective Structure Demolition" for notification requirements if materials suspected of containing hazardous materials are encountered.

END OF DOCUMENT 003126

EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION 003126 - Page 2 of 2

THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS PROVIDED BY THE GSA

ASBESTOS, LEAD PAINT AND REGULATED WASTE

SURVEY

WAREHOUSE FACILITY

38 POLAND AVENUE

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70177

PREPARED FOR

10000 RICHMOND AVENUE, SUITE 100

HOUSTON TEXAS 77042

Thomas George Environmental Scientist

PREPARED BY

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

11950 INDUSTRIPLEX BLVD

BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA

PHONE: (225) 293-8378

Scott J. Dahlgren June 15, 2022 Principal Consultant

PSI PROJECT NUMBER: 02592072-1

Project Number: 025912072-1 Bywater Warehouse Facility www.intertek.com/building

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.2 PURPOSE

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

2.4 LIMITATIONS

2.5 WARRANTY

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

4 METHODOLOGY

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

4.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES

4.4 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

5 FINDINGS

5.1 RESULTS

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

TABLES

TABLE 1 – SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS SAMPLING RESULTS

TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF PAINT CHIP SAMPLING RESULTS

TABLE 3 – SUMMARY OF PAINT PCB SAMPLING RESULTS

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS AND

SAMPLE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

APPENDIX B – PCB ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C – FIGURES

APPENDIX D – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX D – PERSONNEL & LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

Project Number 02592072-1

June 15, 2022

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI), an Intertek company, was retained by PDG Architects to conduct a survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint and hazardous materials at the Bywater Warehouse Facility located at 38 Poland Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana (subject property). The subject property is an office building located within a larger warehouse building located on the batture side of the Mississippi River levee located at the south end of Poland Avenue. The subject property is located in the northeast corner of the larger warehouse building. PSI conducted the survey on May 11, 2022.

The purpose of the investigation and sampling was to provide information regarding the presence, condition, and estimated quantity of accessible ACM, lead-based paint and hazardous materials on and within the Bywater Warehouse Facility. Roof systems were not included in the scope of this survey.

ACM Survey Summary Suspect asbestos-containing homogeneous materials sampled during the survey were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and State of Louisiana define an ACM as any material containing greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

ACMs (>1%) were identified through PLM analysis during this investigation.

LBP Survey Summary In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned the sale of lead-based paint to consumers, and its application to areas where consumers have direct access to painted surfaces. As a result of this ban, buildings painted prior to 1978 are suspected of containing leaded paint. The EPA and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) define LBP as any coating having 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater lead when tested by an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) device, or 0.5% lead by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm) by laboratory analysis.

Sixteen (16) paint chip samples were collected on May 11, 2022. Each of the paint chip samples contained detectable levels of lead and nine (9) of the paint chip samples contained lead above the standard of 0.5% by weight and are considered to be lead-based paint.

Other Hazardous Materials Summary The EPA banned certain uses of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (i.e., plasticizers, adhesives, paints and waterproofing) in 1973 and banned U.S. PCB production in 1979; however, PCBs may still be present in older transformers, capacitors, and light ballasts. PCBs may also be present in adhesives, glazing, or caulking.

Two (2) window caulking samples were collected and analyzed for PCB content. Both of the samples contained concentrations of PCBs above the laboratory reporting limits ,but were below 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg or parts per million).

PSI also performed a visual survey for potential mercury containing light bulbs and thermostatic switches, petroleum tanks/drums/containers, hydraulic oils, halon fire extinguishers, and chlor-fluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerants. Some of these materials were identified during the visual survey

This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information.

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this project consisted of conducting an asbestos, lead paint, and hazardous materials survey, including inspection, sampling and analysis of accessible and exposed interior and exterior areas at the subject property, excluding the roof.

Asbestos Survey This survey was intended to identify ACM as required by the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), OSHA, and the State of Louisiana. Additional information relative to friability, quantity and condition is also provided to assist the owner or his representative in the appropriate decisions involved with renovation and demolition. Regulations pertaining to asbestos renovation and demolition surveys include 40 CFR Part 61 (NESHAP), 29 CFR 1926.1101 (Asbestos in Construction) and applicable State of Louisiana regulations.

Limited Lead Paint Survey This survey was intended to screen for LBP using methodologies in general accordance with the EPA, OSHA and the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Edition).

Other Select building Hazardous Materials This survey was intended to identify the following additional environmental considerations:

• Deteriorated paint

• Mercury switches

• Mercury lights

• PCBs in Transformers and light ballasts

• PCBs in window caulking or glazing

• Hydraulic fluids

• Petroleum tanks/drums

• Halon fire extinguishers

• CFC refrigerants

2.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this survey was to provide general information for the subject building regarding the presence, condition, and quantity of accessible and/or exposed friable and non-friable, materials that contain asbestos, lead-based paint, and other select hazardous materials.

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

Authorization to perform the inspection was given by PSI’s receipt of a signed copy of PSI Proposal Number 0259-371676, between PDG Architects and PSI.

Site access was granted by Raluca Zamfir of PDG Architects (the Client). An escort at the warehouse building in which the area to be renovated was located was provided by the Client.

2.4 LIMITATIONS

The asbestos survey was intended to meet the requirements of the EPA NESHAP for Asbestos demolition or renovation. The limited lead paint survey was not intended to meet the requirements of the EPA, OSHA or HUD requirements for demolition or renovation. The asbestos survey included a thorough inspection of all areas of planned renovation.

PSI did not sample any system which presented a hazard to the inspection team such as energized electrical systems or within confined spaces. PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing, such as penetration of the roofing system.

Inaccessible is defined as areas of the building that were locked, or where admittance was not permitted. It also includes areas/materials that could not be tested (sampled) without destruction of the structure or a portion of the structure, and areas/materials that could not be safely reached by the inspector or inspection team. If access to a portion of the building was not obtained (which otherwise would have been tested), such limitations specifically are identified in the Findings Section of this report.

PSI did not sample any system which presented a hazard to the inspection team such as energized electrical systems or within confined spaces.

PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing, such as fire rated doors, vapor barriers, mirror mastics, etc.

2.5 WARRANTY

The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM for the building structure. PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report.

The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM existing at the time of the inspection. Test results are valid only for the material(s) tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the study or which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or physically accessible to the Inspector. The study is also limited to the information available from the client at the time it was conducted.

As directed by the client, PSI did not provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same. Client acknowledges that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Client further acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI’s control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification.

No other warrantees are implied or expressed.

Use by Third Parties This report was prepared pursuant to the contract PSI has with PDG Architects. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the subject site that was unique and between PSI and its client and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of the communication between PSI and its client, reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than PDG Architects, for whom it was prepared, is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI.

Reliance or use by any such third party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third party a third-party beneficiary to PSI’s contract with PDG Architects. Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party’s risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party.

Unidentifiable Conditions This report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility that there may exist conditions which could not be identified within the scope of work or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. This report is also limited to information available from the client at the time it was conducted. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject site as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations.

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

Subject Property: 30 Poland Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70177

Facility Construction Date: Pre-1978

Previous Renovation Dates: Unknown

Number of Floors: 2

Estimated Square Footage 5,000 Square Feet

Construction Type: Steel Frame Construction, concrete and plaster exterior walls, wood-framed interior walls with drywall and wood paneling.

Building Occupant(s) Un-occupied

Additional Information Not applicable

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

Name of PSI Personnel: Jasmine Wilson Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) Lead Inspector # MI206828 Thomas George LDEQ Asbestos Inspector # AI112486

Date(s) of Inspection: May 11, 2022

Escort: Warehouse “leader on duty” directed PSI to the subject property.

4 METHODOLOGY

Inspection, survey and sampling procedures were performed in general accordance with the guidelines published by the EPA, OSHA and/or HUD where applicable. The inspection and survey described below was performed by an EPA accredited inspector who is licensed or certified in the State of Louisiana, as appropriate.

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

Prior to conducting the visual inspection, PSI was to review documents, if provided by the client, including:

drawings, floor plans, historical data, maintenance records, previous survey reports, laboratory reports, etc. for information regarding construction history and building materials.

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

ACM Survey An initial building structure walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence of suspect ACM’s that were accessible and/or exposed. Exterior areas, excluding, the roof systems were included in the scope of this investigation.

The inspection and sampling were limited to those areas and materials that were accessible and did not involve destruction of walls, other building elements, physical barriers, or the structural integrity of the item being tested.

Materials which were similar in color, texture, general appearance and which appear to have been installed at the same time were grouped in Homogeneous Sampling Areas. Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were also noted.

The inspector evaluated the overall condition of the material and determined whether the materials were friable or non-friable by touching the material, where practical. A friable material is defined as any material able to be crushed, crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

Each material was further assessed for overall condition. Conditions were rated as good, damaged or significantly damaged. PSI’s inspector also identified the EPA NESHAP classification of the material: Regulated ACM (RACM), Category I non-friable ACM, and Category II non-friable ACM, based on the materials current condition. PSI’s inspector provided estimated quantities of the materials identified as ACM, based only on materials that were accessible and exposed.

Limited LBP Survey An initial visual inspection was conducted of exterior accessible building surfaces for the presence of paints and varnishes suspected of containing lead. Based on observations, representative-building components such as windows and frames, doors and frames, columns, walls, and ceilings with homogeneous suspect paint were randomly selected for paint chip sampling.

Select Hazardous Materials Survey PSI also performed a visual inventory of select hazardous materials that included: mercury switches, mercury lights, PCB transformers, PCB window caulking, and equipment containing hydraulic fluids. These “other” hazardous materials were limited to those materials that are attached to the structure. Except for the collection of window caulking or glazing for analysis of PCBs, PSI did not conduct testing on these potential materials to confirm the presence of PCBs in ballasts, mercury, or other hazardous material; thus, their actual presence in the building materials is only suspected. PSI did not inventory unattached/loose items, such as paint containers, drums, old batteries, etc., as these are typically removed by the owner before renovation/razing activities.

4.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES

ACM Survey Following the walkthrough, the Inspector collected samples of suspect materials.

EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous sampling area. While an effort was made to collect samples randomly, samples were taken preferentially from areas already damaged or areas which were the least visible to minimize disturbance of the material.

Each sample location was sprayed with amended water and was kept wet during the entire sampling process.

Samples were collected by coring through the material from the surface down to the base substrate. All layers of the material were extracted and placed into a sample container for transport to the laboratory. Sample containers were sealed and labeled with a unique sample identification number. Where appropriate, sampled materials were sealed with an encapsulant or covered with tape after sampling. PSI is not responsible for restoring the sampled areas to their pre-sampled condition. In accordance with the agreement between PSI and the client, roofing materials were not sampled as part of this survey.

Limited LBP Survey For paint chip samples, an area of approximately two (2) square inches was extracted from coated components down to but not including the substrate. Chip samples were placed in a sealed container, and labeled for analysis. Restoration and repainting of sampled surfaces was not within the scope of PSI’s lead inspection protocol.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s) PSI personnel conducted a survey to identify the presence of window systems with caulking or glazing that may contain PCBs. An estimate of the window systems was documented and samples of caulking was collected and submitted for laboratory analysis for PCB content.

PSI personnel also conducted a survey to assess the presence and locations of PCB-containing light ballasts and transformers. A representative sample of ballasts were inspected for indications of PCB content. If the ballast has no label, it was assumed as PCB containing.

4.4 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Asbestos Samples All samples were analyzed at PSI’s Asbestos Laboratory located at 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220. The PSI Pittsburgh Asbestos Laboratory is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Accredited (#101350-0) and an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Accredited (#8222) Laboratory. A copy of the Laboratory’s Accreditation Certificate is included in the Appendix.

The samples were analyzed for asbestos on a “positive-stop” basis by PLM and in accordance with the “EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116 July 1993). Analysis was performed by visually observing the bulk samples with a stereoscope followed by slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification.

Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample. Next, the samples were mounted on slides and analyzed by PLM for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite), and fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, etc.). Asbestos was identified by refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation. The same characteristics were used to identify the non-asbestos constituents.

It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified or quantified by PLM. As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes. As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) can be used for a more definitive analysis of these materials but was not in the scope of work.

Laboratory Quality Control Program - Asbestos The PSI Asbestos Laboratory maintains an in-house quality control program. This program involves blind reanalysis of ten (10) percent of all samples, precision and accuracy controls, and use of standard bulk reference materials. In addition, the PSI Asbestos Laboratory is accredited by NVLAP, which also has quality control procedures inherent in its program.

Limited LBP Survey The paint chip samples were analyzed by flame Atomic Absorption (AA) in accordance with method EPA SW- 846 7000B/3050B. The analysis was performed by International Asbestos Testing Laboratories (iATL) American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) accredited laboratory (AIHA #100188) in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey.

PCB Samples Two (2) samples of window caulking were collected and were analyzed at Pace Analytical located in St. Rose, Louisiana. A copy of the Laboratory’s Accreditation Certificate is included in the Appendix.

5 FINDINGS

5.1 RESULTS

The “Report of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos,” the Sample Chain-of-Custody(s), and Site Map are included in the Appendices.

Asbestos Survey Table 1 below lists the suspect ACMs observed throughout the building along with the results of the inspection and laboratory analysis.

Table 1 - Summary of Asbestos Sampling Results

HA

No.

Sample No. Description Area/ Location Condition

Result

(% Asbestos) Friability Quantity

A A-01, A- 02, A-03

12” x 12” Black Floor Tile and Black Mastic

1st Floor;

Restrooms, Shower, Storage Good

FT-NAD

M-5% CH

Non- Friable

1,000 SF

B B-04, B- 05, B-06

Black Floor Tile/Beige Floor Tile/ Brown

Floor Tile

1st Floor; Under Carpet

Good

Black FT-NAD Beige FT-5% CH

Brown FT –

7% CH

Non- Friable

1,500 SF

C C-07, C- 08, C-09

Tan/Gray Window Glazing

Metal Framed Windows, Front and

Sides Fair NAD

Non- Friable

Windows

D D-10, D- 11, D-12

Tan/Gray Window Glazing

Metal-Framed Windows, Front and

Sides Fair NAD

Non- Friable

Windows

E E-13, E- 14, E-15

Tan/Gray Window Glazing

Wood-Framed Windows, Front and

Sides

Fair NAD Non- Friable

Windows

F F-16, F- 17, F-18

Covebase mastic Throughout Good NAD Non-

Friable

<1,000 SF

G G-19 through G-23

Plaster and Skim Coat Exterior Walls Good NAD Non-

Friable

2,500 SF

H H-24, H- 25, H-26

12” x 12” White Ceiling Tiles

Throughout 1st Floor

Good NAD Friable 2,500 SF

I I-27, I-

28, I-29 Brown Ceiling Tile

Mastic Throughout 1st

Floor Good NAD Non-Friable 1,500 SF

J J-30, J- 31, J-32

Ceiling Panels 2nd Floor Along Edge of Room Poor NAD Friable 200 SF

Table 1 - Summary of Asbestos Sampling Results

HA

No.

Sample No. Description Area/ Location Condition

Result

(% Asbestos) Friability Quantity

K K-33, K- 34, K-35

12” x 12” Black Floor Tile/ Gray Floor Tile

2nd Floor, Throughout

Good Black FT-NAD

Gray FT-5% CH Non-

Friable

2,500 SF

NOTES:

HA = Homogenous Area, Asbestos Type: CH = Chrysotile, AM = Amosite, CR = Crocidolite, TR = Tremolite, NAD = No Asbestos Detected, PT = Point Count Condition of Material: G = Good, F = Fair, P = Poor Material Classification: TSI = Thermal System Insulation, SUR = Surfacing Material, MISC = Miscellaneous Material NESHAP Category: Regulated ACM (RACM), Cat I NF=Category I Non-Friable ACM, Cat II NF= Category II Non-Friable ACM

Limited LBP Survey The current Regulatory Standards for the definition of a LBP is the “Federal Action Level” from the EPA and HUD’s “Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing”, 2012 Edition. The “Federal Action Level” for a paint chip is 0.5% lead by weight.

Building components were identified to be surfaced with paint containing lead in excess of the standard, 0.5% lead by weight as established by the EPA and the HUD guidelines. A total of sixteen (16) paint chip samples were collected from various components inside and outside the building. Nine (9) of the samples indicated lead concentrations equal to or in excess of 0.5% lead by weight, however, detectable levels of lead were found in each of the samples.

The “Analytical Report – Analysis of Paint for Lead Determination,” and the Sample Chain-of-Custody are included in the Appendices. Table 2 gives a description of the painted components, their general locations, and laboratory analysis.

Table 2: Summary of Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample

ID

Paint Color Substrate and Component Location Lead Content (% by weight)

LP-01 White on Blue Concrete, Floor Women’s Bathroom, 2nd Floor 0.046

LP-02 Brown Layered Wood, Rail Stairs 0.75

LP-03 Beige Layered Metal Frame, Windows Metal Windows, 2nd

Floor 0.87

LP-04 Beige Wood Frame, Windows Wood Windows, 2nd

Floor 0.26

LP-05 Brown Wood, Doors Wood Doors, 2nd Floor 3.7

LP-06 White Concrete Surfacing, Walls Walls, 2nd Floor 1.9

LP-07 Brown Metal, Doors Metal Doors, 2nd Floor 0.43

LP-08 White/Blue/Gray Concrete Surfacing, Walls Exterior Walls 3.7

LP-09 White Drywall, Walls Walls, 1st Floor 0.066

LP-10 White/Brown/Green Wood, Doors Wood Doors, 1st Floor 0.093

LP-11 White/Green/Orange Metal, Beams Exterior Walls 5.0

Table 2: Summary of Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample

ID

Paint Color Substrate and Component Location Lead Content (% by weight)

LP-12 White on Green Metal, Doors Metal Doors, 1st Floor 0.33

LP-13 White on Orange Metal, Overhead Pipes 2nd Floor 4.2

LP-14 White on Green Wood, Baseboards 2nd Floor 0.016

LP-15 White Metal Frame, Windows 1st Floor 0.87

LP-16 Green on Orange Metal Frame, Windows Building Exterior 12

PCB

The table below lists the suspect PCB caulk observed throughout the building along with the results of the inspection and laboratory analysis.

Table 3 - Summary of PCB Sampling Result (mg/kg) Sample Number Description Location Results

PCB-1 Window Caulk Wood Windows, 2nd

Floor PCB-Total - 0.309

PCB-2 Window Caulk Metal Windows, 1st and 2nd Floors PCB-Total - 0.450

Other Hazardous Material The following potentially hazardous materials that require special handling and/or disposal considerations for renovations were identified:

• Fluorescent light bulbs -Universal Wastes

• Fluorescent light ballasts – Potential PCB content

• Hot water Tank – White Good

• Drinking Water Fountain - CFC refrigerants

• Window HVAC Units – CFC refrigerants

• HVAC Split Systems – CFC Refrigerants

5.1.1 INACCESSIBLE AREAS

PSI was not able to access the Storage Room on the subject property, which was locked. The area was approximately 100 square feet in area.

5.1.2 NON-SUSPECT MATERIALS

The following materials were observed but are considered ‘non-suspect’ ACM due to their composition (fiberglass, rubber, etc.) and were not sampled.

• Rubber/foam pipe insulation, and

• fiberglass roll/batt insulation.

5.1.3 REGULATORY GUIDELINES:

Asbestos

ACM Definition –

The EPA and OSHA consider a material to be ACM if at least one sample from the homogeneous area shows asbestos in an amount greater than 1%.

Point Count Quantification –

If a material is found to contain less than 10% asbestos via visual estimation, it can be treated as non-ACM per EPA Regulations, if verified to contain 1% or less asbestos by the Point Count Quantification Procedure. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to ≤1%) must be assumed to be greater than 1% and treated as ACM. Please refer to the laboratory analyses for a more detailed description of the microscopic analysis of individual samples. No samples were quantified by the Point Count Procedure in this Asbestos Survey.

EPA NESHAP Category –

EPA NESHAP classifies ACM into the following categories:

• RACM is any (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non- friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.

• Category I Non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos.

• Category II Non-friable ACM includes any material, except for a Category I non-friable ACM, which contains more than one-percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

OSHA –

OSHA requires all suspect materials to be analyzed by layer, even materials such as drywall/joint compound, which may sometimes be composited per the EPA. If any layer contains asbestos in a concentration >1%, the material is considered an ACM.

OSHA has a classification system (I thru IV) for ACM depending on the type of material and the disturbance as follows:

• Class I work is defined as activities involving the removal of ACM or presumed ACM (PACM) that is thermal system insulation (TSI) and surfacing materials.

• Class II activities involve removal of ACM/PACM other than TSI or surfacing material.

• Class III work includes repair and maintenance operations which are likely to disturb ACM/PACM.

• Class IV work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM/PACM.

Materials where asbestos is detected, but where point counting is conducted and determined that the concentration is ≤1% asbestos, are not considered to be ACM by EPA or OSHA. However, these materials are considered unclassified asbestos work per OSHA. Some OSHA work control practices and prohibitions will still apply, with the extent depending on whether the worker's exposure to airborne asbestos exceeds the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL).

Additional details of the OSHA asbestos regulations related to the construction industry can be found in 29 CFR part 1926.1101.

Lead Paint

In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned the sale of lead-based paint to consumers, and its application to areas where consumers have direct access to painted surfaces. As a result of this ban, buildings painted prior to 1978 are suspected of containing leaded paint.

LBP Definition –

The EPA and HUD defines "lead-based paint" as any "paint, surface coating that contains lead equal to or exceeding one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or 0.5% lead by weight."

EPA – Renovation, Repair and Painting Program

EPA's Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP Rule) requires that firms performing renovation, repair, and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities and pre-schools built before 1978 have their firm certified by EPA (or an EPA authorized state), use certified renovators who are trained by EPA-approved training providers and follow lead-safe work practices.

OSHA –

The current OSHA standard (29 CFR 1926.62) for lead exposure in construction has a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air (50 µg/m3), measured as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA). As with all OSHA health standards, when the PEL is exceeded, the hierarchy of controls requires employers to institute feasible engineering and work practice controls as the primary means to reduce and maintain employee exposures to levels at or below the PEL. When all feasible engineering and work practice controls have been implemented but have proven inadequate to meet the PEL, employers must nonetheless implement these controls and must supplement them with appropriate respiratory protection. The employer also must ensure that employees wear the respiratory protection provided when it is required.

HUD –

The Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Edition) enforce HUD’s vision to reduce hazards in housing in a cost-effective manner while protecting the health of children. These guidelines are used by those who are required to identify and control lead paint hazards, as well as property owners, landlords, and child-care center operators. Helpful advice on renovations in older housing, lead-based paint inspections and risk assessments, and where to go for help can be found in the guidelines. The guidelines also outline what users have to do to meet requirements and recommendations;

identify training – and if applicable, certification – required for people who conduct the work; and describe how the work should be done.

The guidelines complement regulations that have been issued by HUD, the EPA, and OSHA

PCBs

The EPA has prohibited the manufacturing of materials with concentrations of PCBs greater than or equal to 50 mg/kg, and has extended this concentration to in-place materials containing PCBs. Materials considered to be PCB-containing require special handling and disposal.

5.1.4 QUANTIFICATION

Quantification of suspect ACMs was conducted using visual estimation by the accredited inspector. This visual estimation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the asbestos industry based on materials that were accessible and exposed. These values are sufficiently accurate for the purpose of documenting the presence of ACM within its space for the purpose of identifying abatement control conditions or for general policy considerations. Actual quantities may differ between visually estimated values and physical measurements. If a licensed asbestos abatement contractor is engaged to remove any identified ACM, the abatement contractor is responsible for verifying reported quantities of ACM.

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

ACM Survey ACMs were identified in the warehouse facility.

Assumed ACMs were not found in the warehouse facility.

Materials with low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) were not identified in warehouse facility.

Limited LBP Survey Lead was detected above the regulatory level for LBP, or the applicable method detection limits, in the paint tested at the subject property.

Other Hazardous Material The following potentially hazardous materials that require special handling and/or disposal considerations for renovations were identified. materials were identified and Materials containing the following hazardous materials:

• Fluorescent light bulbs -Universal Wastes

• Fluorescent light ballasts – Potential PCB content

• Hot water Tank – White Good

• Drinking water Fountain - Chloro-fluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerants

• Window HVAC Units – CFC refrigerants

• HVAV Split Systems – CFC Refrigerants

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

ACM

• If additional suspect materials not documented in this report are encountered during work activities, the material should be considered asbestos-containing unless bulk sampling is performed and laboratory analysis proves otherwise.

• Category I non-friable ACM (such as floor tiles) may often be left in place during demolition if not made friable by cutting, grinding or sanding. If left in place, these materials cannot be recycled or used as clean fill.

• Regulated ACM (RACM), including Category II non-friable ACMs (such as mastics), must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM. PSI recommends documentary air monitoring to verify compliance with the NESHAP Regulations.

Lead-Based Paint Lead based-paint was detected in nine (9) of the 16 samples collected. In addition, detectable levels of lead were identified in each of the coatings sampled. Should suspect coatings not sampled as part of this survey be discovered during the renovation/demolition, they must be treated as lead containing until sampling and analysis prove otherwise.

It should be noted that OSHA regulates workers exposure to lead paint concentrations in any detectable amount.

Therefore, in order to satisfy OSHA requirements, worker protection and monitoring may be required for work activities that disturb paints that contain lead in any amount. In accordance with the OSHA Construction Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62), it is the contractors’ responsibility to protect their workers when an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead.

Other Hazardous Materials The identified hazardous materials should be properly disposed in accordance with applicable regulations.

Should other suspected hazardous materials be discovered during the demolition, proper disposal and storage regulations for each material should be followed.

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS AND SAMPLE

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc

PDG Architects

Date Received: 5/13/2022 Date Completed: 5/17/2022

11950 Industriplex Boulevard Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Attn: Thomas George

Project ID: 02592072-1

Bywater Warehouse

Date Reported: 5/17/2022

Page: 1 of 3Analyst: Preston Hunt Work Order: 2205312 Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

001AA-01 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

002AA-02 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

003AA-03 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

004AB-04 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Beige, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile7% None Reported

(3) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

005AB-05 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Beige, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile7% None Reported

(3) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

006AB-06 (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Beige, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile7% None Reported

(3) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile5% None Reported

007AC-07 (1) Gray, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

008AC-08 (1) Tan, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

009AC-09 (1) Gray, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

010AD-10 (1) Off-White, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

011AD-11 (1) Off-White, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested as received. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

George Skarupa

LA Certification 04054

Page: 2 of 3Analyst: Preston Hunt Work Order: 2205312 Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

012AD-12 (1) Off-White, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

013AE-13 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

014AE-14 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

015AE-15 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

016AF-16 (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

017AF-17 (1) Tan, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

018AF-18 (1) Tan, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

019AG-19 (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

020AG-20 (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

No Skim Coat

021AG-21 (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

No Skim Coat

022AG-22 (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

No Skim Coat

023AG-23 (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

024AH-24 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass 40% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

025AH-25 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass 40% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested as received. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

Page: 3 of 3Analyst: Preston Hunt Work Order: 2205312 Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

026AH-26 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass 40% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

027AI-27 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

028AI-28 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

029AI-29 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

030AJ-30 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 100% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

031AJ-31 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 100% Cellulose…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .