About this file

This document provides details regarding solicitation number HC101922R0006 issued by the Defense Information Systems Agency for information technology and cybersecurity support services. The solicitation is a single-award, firm-fixed price contract to provide IT and cybersecurity support to the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facility Code 109 in compliance with Department of Defense, Department of Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command, and Department of Energy regulatory requirements. The period of performance is five years with a one-year base period and four one-year option periods. This is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 541519 and small business size standard of $30 million. Questions are due by May 23, 2022 and proposals are due by June 6, 2022. The work will be performed at Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam and Naval Base Guam.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF) Code 109 Information Technology and Cybersecurity Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 9 QandA Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation HC1019-22-R-0006 Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
ADDENDUM WITH TRACK CHANGES Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 PWS Revised 26MAY2022 Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 RFP CLIN Pricing Worksheet_Amend 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10 Mission-Essential Contractor Services.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 RFP CLIN Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 PWS Attachment A.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 PWS.docx DOCX document
SOLICITATION HC1019-22-R-0006..pdf PDF
Attachment 6 GFP Attachment.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment 9 Questions Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 DD Form 254.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 PWS Attachment B.docx DOCX document
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BVTO Evaluation Tables Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color
Rating
Description
Blue
Outstanding
Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Purple
Good
Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Green
Acceptable
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow
Marginal
Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red
Unacceptable
Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 2. Definitions Relating to the Technical Evaluation Rating Process

Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal/quotation to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal/quotation that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness in the proposal/quotation is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal/quotation that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Uncertainty is any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal/quotation for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., there is more than one way to interpret the proposal/quotation or inconsistencies in the proposal/quotation indicating there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

Weakness means a flaw in the proposal/quotation that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .