Attachment 7 - Past_Performance Survey.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HECM Loan Comparison and Underwriting Tool (HLCUT) for Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM)
- Solicitation number
- 86615624R00007
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey for a federal contract opportunity. It is to be completed by a reference on the past performance of a contractor or key personnel for Solicitation No. 86615624Q00008. The survey evaluates the contractor or key personnel on five criteria: quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel. The reference is asked to provide an adjectival rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) for each criteria and to provide additional comments to substantiate any rating other than Satisfactory. The survey is related to a federal contract opportunity for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to procure the development and maintenance of a HECM Loan Comparison and Underwriting Tool (HLCUT) for HECM roster counselors, which will provide calculations and track responses for HECM loan products.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF 1449 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 86615624R00007 Page After 1449 HECM HLCUT Updated.docx | DOCX document | |
| Government Response to Industry Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SF30 Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| HLCUT Vendor Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SF30 86615624R00007 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 86615624R00007 Page After 1449 HECM HLCUT.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 QASP.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 - Sample Price Breakdown Worksheet with Rates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 HLCUT PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 - Past_Performance_Information_Chart.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 -Price Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - Sample Labor Category_Hours Breakdown Worksheet without Rates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 7 Past Performance Survey Solicitation No. 86615624Q00008
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor or key personnel as designated below:
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| CONTRACTOR OR KEY PERSONNEL NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor or key personnel identified above to provide past performance information to HUD to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.
| Summarize the services acquired here. |
| If this past performance survey is related to key personnel, please summarize the level of interface you had with the designated key personnel throughout the life of the project you oversaw. |
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .