Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 133 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911S024R0005
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire used to gather information on a contractor's past and current performance. The questionnaire covers the contractor's compliance with technical requirements, project management effectiveness, timeliness of deliverables, commitment to customer satisfaction, and any other relevant performance details. The completed questionnaire will be used in the evaluation and award of a federal contract opportunity.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Enterprise Classroom Program (ECP). The Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) - Fort Eustis, Virginia, plans to award a single Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with Firm-Fixed Price Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) as a competitive 8(a) set-aside. The contract will provide turnkey classroom sustainment and technology services for a 12-month base year and two option years.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
APPENDIX D – ENCLOSURE 2
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC: Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., & E-mail Address)
The following questions pertain to the Contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with
Contractor performance were experienced for which the Contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with Contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to
Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Acceptable
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’
Interest
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Acceptable
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .